Saturday, August 6, 2022

Wayfinding through the stars: the science and craft of medieval navigation in the Indian Ocean

Navigation was always counted prominently among the ‘sciences’ and arts of traditional cultures. 
In this talk we will see why, and we will find to what extent, if at all, navigation might have a place among the other arts and crafts in our current understanding of the terms.
We will look, as a case study, at the practices of medieval Indian Ocean pilots, and quite particularly at their sophisticated usage of the lunar mansions (manazil al-qamar), and stars in general, for making their way through the ocean.

Friday, August 5, 2022

Croatia (HHI) layer update in the GeoGarage platform

73 nautical rasterised charts based on official ENC updated

Geopolitics of subsea cables in the Arctic



The clouds begin to thin over the Arctic Ocean Aug.19, 2009.
Photo: Patrick Kelley

From The Arctic Institute by Alexandra Midddleton & Bjorn Ronning
 
Subsea cables are essential parts of infrastructure, in that they serve to transmit all Internet data.
For something so critical to our modern life they are well hidden in the depths of oceans and seas.
Subsea cables have recently made headlines.
The volcanic eruption in Tonga cut the fiber optic cable connecting the archipelago to the rest of the world.
Underwater cables are vulnerable to natural disasters and the consequences are felt both locally and globally.
However, it is not only natural disasters but also security risks that may affect the functioning of the subsea cables.
The Arctic Svalbard archipelago experienced a subsea cable disruption in January 2022 that would require repair, but the underlying reasons for the problem are unclear, with some media quickly suggesting cable sabotage as part of military stance.

Connectivity in the Arctic is the cornerstone for sustainable development, promoting commercial development, addressing social concerns, and advancing transportation infrastructure in Arctic regions.
Much of the Arctic is remote as a region, with low population density and harsh climatic conditions making it one of the last areas to gain broadband connectivity.
Historically, development of connectivity infrastructure in the Arctic has been hampered by difficult terrain, climate, distances, and the need to serve sparsely populated regions.
Cold temperatures, snow, and ice can affect the reliability of communications equipment and require special measures to mitigate risks.
In addition to these factors, higher costs and staffing challenges affect the deployment of network infrastructure in some Arctic regions.
Costs of deploying and maintaining connectivity infrastructure in areas without road access and electrical grids were identified as risk factors in a report by the Arctic Council Task Force on Improved Connectivity in the Arctic. Due to the low population density and harsh environment, businesses in the Arctic have historically been unable to make strong cases for connectivity infrastructure investment and have relied on public investment through programs and grants. Access to modern subsea cable infrastructure can be considered an essential human right due to the provision of broadband services.
Yet many Arctic settlements are still deprived of it.

This article addresses the status of Arctic cables projects that are currently in flux.
Bringing security and geopolitical considerations into the analysis, it traces the evolution of recent subsea cables projects in the Arctic, and focuses on the Arctic Connect, a Trans-Arctic subsea cable project that was jointly developed by Finland and Russia and is currently on hold indefinitely.
Additionally, it will analyze the role of the Russian-led Polar Express subsea cable project from Murmansk to Vladivostok with landing lines to the largest ports and settlements along the Russian Arctic zone and a new project, Far North Fiber Express Route, that will connect Europe with Japan and Asia via the Northwest Passage in the Arctic.

History of Arctic cables development

Since their origination, subsea cables projects in the Arctic have developed along shipping routes in both the North-East and in North-West directions.
Already in 2011 in the North-East direction, Russia initiated the state-owned project ROTACS (Russian Optical Trans-Arctic Submarine Cable System).
In April 2012, the Russian owned Polarnet Project Company signed an agreement with the US-based Tyco Electronic Subcom (TES) for the construction of the ROTACS.
The project was put on hold and later terminated as a consequence of the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Severe sanctions on Russia, especially on high-tech exports, also contributed to the project termination. Later, the Arctic Connect project was initiated on the North-East corridor to cover connectivity needs in the Arctic.

In the North-West direction, the US-based company Quintillion was the first company to launch a Trans-Arctic project through the North-West passage.
Due to financial challenges this project ended.
The newest Trans-Arctic cable project along the North-West route is the Far North Fiber Express Route project that is analyzed further in the article.

International cooperation and Arctic Connect

The Arctic Connect subsea cable was an initiative led by Finland, starting from 2015, that planned to link Europe and Asia through a subsea fiber optic cable on the seabed along the Northern Sea Route (NSR).
The initiative was led by the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications and was carried out by the Finnish state-owned fiber infrastructure operator Cinia Ltd.
In March 2016, Cinia Ltd announced that it would build the Arctic Connect undersea data cable, connecting Europe with Asia.6)The Arctic Connect project mission was partly meant to improve the connectivity in Arctic areas, in line with the objectives of the Arctic Council.
Previously, Cinia had already completed the fast and cyber secure C-Lion1 submarine cable connection between Finland and Germany.
The Arctic Connect cable aimed to meet the current availability of and additional needs for fiber-optic connectivity that was planned from Southern Finland to Kirkenes, Norway to Murmansk, Russia.

The total length of the Arctic Connect subsea cable was estimated to be 13,800 km, using the shortest path between Asia and Europe, compared to the numerous existing subsea cable systems that are currently connecting Asia and Europe via the Arabian/Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.
The Arctic Connect subsea cable project was planned to be finished between 2022-2023 with an estimated cost of 0.8 to 1.2 billion USD.7)

Arctic Connect would link Europe with Russia and Asia and provide a better internet connection with lower latency, thanks to the shorter distance.
Additionally, the lower shipping traffic along the NSR as compared to the south shipping corridors was anticipated to make Arctic Connect cable less prone to disruptions caused by human activities.

A preliminary study for Arctic Connect was launched in 2015, followed by a political feasibility study conducted the next year.
In order to operate in the Russian controlled Arctic waters, Cinia needed a Russian partner.
In June 2019, Cinia and one of the largest Russian telecom operators, MegaFon, signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the Arctic Connect subsea cable project.8)

In December 2019, MegaFon agreed to create the split-ownership joint venture Arctic Link Development Oy with Cinia for the construction of the Arctic Connect submarine cable.
The first marine survey work for the project was started in August 2020 and was finished in November 2020.
In 2020, the Arctic Connect project became even more international with new partners from Japan, Norway and Finland.9) At the same time the project was clouded by non-transparent financial and cost structures, the uncertainty of foreign investor engagement, and evolving geopolitical threats.10) Finally, in May 2021, MegaFon announced that the structure and economy of the project was to be reconsidered, and subsequently the project was halted.11) Taking into consideration the current geopolitical context with growing economic isolation of Russia from the West, it appears to be unlikely that the cooperation between Cinia and MegaFon would ever resume.
Moreover, Cinia is now committed to the Arctic Express cable through a MoU.

Russian-led Polar Express cable

A Russian regional subsea system, Polar Express, was announced in April 2021, which featured a 12,650km subsea cable and cost 1 billion USD, running along Russia’s entire Arctic coastline, from Murmansk to Vladivostok.
This subsea cable project is being developed by the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, the Federal Agency for Maritime and River Transport (Rosmorrechflot), and the Federal State Unitary Enterprise (FSUE) Rosmorport.
Polar Express is promoted by the Russian state as a digital component of the development of the Northern Sea Route and to support oil and gas and environmental projects in the Arctic.
The shortest fiber optic link between Europe and Asia is an alternative to satellite communications in northern latitudes, providing widely distributed, affordable communications and fast Internet in the Arctic.
Polar Express will include a series of offshore, auxiliary, and research cables that will be used for different purposes.
The project is expected to be completed by 2026.12)

Starting in August 2021, the project is already underway with more than 400km of subsea cable being deployed.
Interestingly, given the size and complexity of this project the cable system is supplied solely by Russian suppliers and equipment manufacturers.
The first batch of cable was manufactured at the Office of Advanced Technologies plant which was recently opened in Murmansk.
In total, nine vessels will participate in the work of laying the cable: four survey vessels, three support vessels, and two cable-laying ships.

Closely linked to Polar Express are plans to connect it to terrestrial cables in the Russian Arctic region.
In December 2021, the largest digital services provider in Russia, Rostelecom, announced a joint venture, which proposed to build a terrestrial route between Asia and Europe, traversing the Russian Federation.
Rostelecom’s ambitions to build a new terrestrial system have been known in the market for a while, and the potential competition from this project would likely put more stress on the commercial viability of the Arctic Connect project.
But what was likely the most important issue to resolve for Russian authorities was to maintain sovereignty, economic development, and national interests through fully Russian-owned and operated critical infrastructure.
It is unlikely that any geopolitical risks would affect this project because the cable has already been manufactured and has started to be laid, using Russian owned capabilities.

Far North Fiber Express

With the Arctic Connect project being halted, Cinia has been searching for other Arctic subsea cable projects to partner with.
In December 2021, Cinia signed a MoU with Far North Digital/True North Global Networks for developing a Pan-Arctic cable system.
This system, named Far North Fiber Express Route, will run from Japan via the Northwest Passage to Europe.
In Europe, the cable system will branch off and land in Ireland and in Northern Norway.
The cable design will provide express fiber routes via Asia to Europe, as well as serve local settlements in US and Canadian Arctic territories.13) The system is slightly longer than the previously planned Arctic Connect system and will likely measure over 16,000 km end-to-end, from Japan to Norway.
The build cost of this system is estimated at EUR 1.2 billion.
No timeframe has been announced yet.

Geopolitical shifts

For a long time there was very little progress on the development of connectivity in the Arctic with subsea cables.
The plans to connect the Arctic through Nordic-Russian cooperation in the name of Arctic Connect did not materialize.
What remains now is two alternative projects: a Russian-led Polar Express and a revised project Far North Fiber Express, which is led by Cinia and goes westwards.
Geopolitically, moving away from Russian project cooperation in favour of projects led by US/Canadian interests is a big shift for the Nordic countries.

One can only speculate on the reasons for MegaFon halting the Arctic Connect project, but the Polar Express would be taking away most of the commercial rationale for building the Arctic Connect system that shares a similar path through the NSR.
At the same time, Russia has plans to develop a data center industry in its own Arctic regions.
Rostelecom announced its plans to launch the first regional data center in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation in the summer of 2022.14) In terms of business, Cinia’s goal remains the same as with the Arctic Connect project — to make Finnish and Nordic data centers more attractive for international data center operators and establish a Nordic hub between the Asian and continental Europe.

The aftermath is that there will most likely be at least two large Arctic subsea cables in less than five years.
Apart from Polar Express projects, there are smaller regional projects, such as a 1,900 km submarine cable connecting the Alaskan Arctic towns of Prudhoe Bay and Nome,15) and a 2,400 km subsea cable linking Nunavut, Canada with Nuuk, Greenland.16)

It should be noted that internationally, there is a great need for more legal statutes governing undersea cables and the threats to these systems.17) Apart from addressing geopolitical tensions and threats, when developing subsea cables the needs of the local people and business should be included in the projects from the beginning.
Increased cyber security and sovereignty considerations will bring more attention to the ownership and financing structure of these Arctic subsea cable projects.
The subsea cables are finally reaching the most remote places on earth, with an Antarctic subsea cable project launched in December 202118) and two large-scale Arctic projects on the way.
Subsea cables are becoming part of the critical infrastructure in the Arctic, providing opportunities for connectivity, sovereignty, and conditions for the development of further business and human potential in the region.
Hence, subsea cables in the Arctic create preconditions for the proper functioning of a digital economy.

Links :

Thursday, August 4, 2022

Spain (IHM) layer update in the GeoGarage platform

 

151 charts (rasterized ENC) updated and 2 new charts added

What are the benefits of adopting autonomy technology for the maritime industry?


 
From ShipInsight by Malcolm Latarche   

Autonomous ships are good for business, for the environment and improves safety both at sea and on land.
Autonomy introduces a new competition area for short-sea shipping and opens a larger market for maritime players – on the expense of polluting, congested and accident-prone truck transportation.

For short sea shipping, the major cost drivers are crew and manual port handling.
These costs can be significantly reduced by introducing autonomy:
Fully autonomous vessels can be built with lower investment cost as there is no need for crew accommodation, crew safety equipment, air condition, sanitary systems or bridge.

Both fully autonomous and automated vessels offer lower operational cost as crew onboard may be reduced or fully replaced by crew on shore which is supporting several vessels.

Autonomous ships provide significant safety benefits, as 75% of maritime accidents are caused by human error with the leading cause being fatigue and attention deficit.

As there is no crew that needs to go ashore for crew change, fully autonomous vessels can more easily adopt slow speed and save energy/fuel.

Autonomous vessels will primarily be maintained when in port.
Hence the vessel is designed with a minimum of rotating parts and her propulsion is likely to be battery driven or driven by gas/fuel cells.
This means that autonomous vessels will have zero or low emissions to air and sea.

Seagoing professions are increasingly perceived as unattractive for the young generation.
Autonomous vessels allow mariners to control and monitor vessels from ashore and enjoy their social life.
There is also a forecasted global shortage of ~150.000 seagoing officers by 2025 (according to ICS and BIMCO Manpower Report 2015).

What can be achieved within our global regulatory framework?

The IMO instruments governing the safety of commercial shipping do not provide any regulations for autonomous operations, but IMO has started a scoping exercise for new regulations.

Meantime, the Maritime Safety Committee, at its 101st session (June 2019) approved “Interim Guidelines for MASS trials”, with the aim of assisting relevant authorities and stakeholders and ensuring that the trials of MASS related systems and infrastructure are conducted safely, securely, and with due regard for protection of the environment.

The term trial means an experiment or series of experiments, conducted over a limited period, in order to evaluate alternative methods of performing specific functions or satisfying regulatory requirements prescribed by various IMO instruments, which would provide at least the same degree of safety, security and protection of the environment as provided by those instruments.

Massterly is currently working with the Norwegian Maritime Authorities to gain approval for operation of unmanned vessels within the Norwegian territorial waters.

The work consists of both documentations, testing and simulations to prove that autonomous and remote control of vessel functions will have a level of safety equivalent or better compared to conventional operations of vessels, with respect to safeguarding life, property and the environment.
Testing of the first vessels will also take place in real life with crew onboard and shore-based operation in parallel, and this testing phase will last until we are confident enough to operate unmanned.

Some of the documents we are preparing for specific vessel projects together with our partners (e.g.
Kongsberg, Wilhelmsen, DNV GL, University of South-Eastern Norway) are Concept of Operations, Safety Philosophy, Design Philosophy, Maintenance philosophy and HAZID (Hazard Identification).

There are many international regulations that must be considered, and where compliance with the intent of mandatory instruments should be ensured.

For example, considering COLREG (International Convention for Preventing Collisions at Sea), we should ensure a level of safety of navigation that is equivalent or better compared to a conventional vessel (where navigation is performed by navigators on board).

Other examples of applicable IMO conventions to consider are the International Convention for Safety of Life At Sea (SOLAS) and the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watch-keeping for Seafarers (STCW).

The above regulations are all based on navigators on board having a full situational awareness based on own perceptions and situation analysis, supported by the aids prescribed by the regulations.
We need to demonstrate how the objectives of the regulation can be met when the navigator’s presence on board is replaced by autonomous and remote navigation.

A Shore Control Center is under construction at Massterly’s office in Norway and the plan is that the center will be manned by crew/operators employed by Wilhelmsen Ship Management (WSM) who as a company will hold a valid DOC (Document of Compliance) and a customized SMS (Safety Management System) for operating autonomous vessels from shore.
The long experience and deep competence of WSM provides quality assurance for safe operations of the vessels.
Coupled with market leading automation technology and cybersecurity measures from Kongsberg we will offer the safest possible operations for the first generation unmanned, commercial vessels.

The Shore Control Center is not only about replacing the onboard crew.
The real potential lies in the added value of integrating information from various sources in the logistics value chain and systems onboard the vessel into a sensible front-end.
This will result in increased decision support for the operator, lower operating costs and improved life cycle management of the vessel/fleet.

We are confident that we will be able to scale the advantages of autonomous vessels within the Norwegian territorial waters, however for the true potential of autonomy to be unleashed we need IMO regulations to adopt to the new reality of technology.
Our hope is that the pioneer work and trials initiated in many countries will give insights that can help shape the future IMO regulations, and accelerate the speed of this work.
Meantime, the industry must keep innovating under regulatory uncertainty.

About Massterly: The two major Norwegian companies Wilhelmsen and Kongsberg have joined forces to lead the development of autonomous shipping globally.
These two strong and innovative companies each owns 50% of Massterly AS which started operations in September 2018.
The main purpose of Massterly is to develop environmentally friendly, safe and cost-efficient logistics, enabling a shift in transportation from congested roads to the sea.