Saturday, November 14, 2026

The cruel North Sea


This is a story of the North Sea, the story of the ocean , two rescue ships and a hand full of men that were duty bound to remain on station during weather conditions that other crews only experience by accident. The men are the heroes; the heroines, the ships.
The only villain is the sea, the North Sea. So sit back and become a fly on the bulkheads of Grampian Protector & Grampian Contender.
Experience gradually increasing weather conditions from a flat calm…to hurricane force winds….in the little known world of an Emerging Response & Rescue Vessel, working to protect the men, women and structures of the North Sea oil industry.
Nowhere else will you see what it is truly like to live, work, train and relax on a ship at sea.

ERRV (Emergency Response & Rescue Vessel). 21st April North East of Shetland.
A 43m Ship in 22 Meter Seas. At the time these waves were filmed they were the largest seas anywhere in the world.

Friday, November 13, 2026

Want to be a shipwreck treasure hunter? You’d better lawyer up

Samuel Scott’s ‘Wager’s Action off Cartagena’ (1747) depicting the Spanish ship San José being attacked by the British near Cartagena, Colombia in 1708 © National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London 
 
From FT by Cristina Ruiz
 
Oceans have become battlefields for salvage companies and nation states — with hundreds of sunken galleons up for grabs 
 
First, they found an anchor hiding in the sand.
Then, silver coins.
A few days later, an uncut 50-carat emerald followed by another twice the size.
The gemstones were from Colombia, and they lay buried in the seabed 30ft underwater.
It was the summer of 1987 and a group of scuba divers led by the American businessman Herbert Humphreys was searching off the coast of the Bahamas for the place where the Spanish galleon Nuestra Señora de las Maravillas foundered during a storm in 1656 after being rammed by another Spanish ship and colliding with a reef.
She took 600 men with her, as well as her precious cargo.
The next summer, the treasure hunters were back.
This time, their haul included an extraordinary gold bodice jewel decorated with 22 emeralds known as a rosa de pecho (breast rose) that was intended to be worn as the centrepiece of a set of matching jewellery by Spanish royalty or nobility.
The piece was in “perfect condition”, as if “it had just fallen over the side”, wrote one of the crew members, Lee Tippin, in his account of the discovery.
“It is like something being passed to you from the hands of the dead,” said Humphreys.
 
American businessman Herbert Humphreys (right) and crew member Lee Tippin with their haul from the Spanish galleon Nuestra Señora de las Maravillas © G Lee Tippin 
 
Next week, the rosa de pecho is going on display at Frieze Abu Dhabi with the London gallery ArtAncient.
It will be shown alongside gold belt fittings also recovered by Humphreys from the remains of the Maravillas, and a heavy gold chain from the Nuestra Señora de Atocha, a Spanish galleon laden with riches that sank in 1622 west of the Florida Keys.
Her treasure was recovered by another American, Mel Fisher, in 1985.
A Tudor-era diamond ring discovered in 2024 by a metal detectorist in Gloucestershire has been added to the Spanish gold; ArtAncient is offering the entire group for £1mn.
“What all these pieces have in common is that they survived because they were lost — that’s the paradox,” says jewellery historian Sophie Morris, who has written the introduction to ArtAncient’s catalogue for the display.
“If the gold jewels hadn’t gone down at sea, they would have been melted down hundreds of years ago or redesigned when fashions changed.” 
 
The ‘rosa de pecho’ (breast rose), part of Humphreys’ Maravillas haul  . . .  ...

is a gold bodice jewel decorated with 22 emeralds intended to be worn by Spanish royalty or nobility 
© ArtAncient
 
The shipwreck finds were “almost certainly made by Spanish or Spanish-trained metalworkers in workshops set up in Latin America to service the demand for New World jewellery back in Europe,” says ArtAncient director Jethro Sverdloff.
In particular, the appetite for Colombian emeralds was enormous.
“The last time Europe had access to great emeralds was in antiquity when there were mines in Egypt, but these were largely exhausted by the Middle Ages.
The Spanish had never seen emeralds that were as vivid and deep in colour as those coming from Latin America.” 
 
 Intriguingly, ArtAncient’s rosa de pecho and gold chain do not appear to have been registered in the records of their respective ships, possibly to avoid the crown tax.
“They may have been contraband items, or they may have been owned by passengers.
We just don’t know,” says Sverdloff.
 

Gold belt fittings also recovered from the remains of the Maravillas 
 
A heavy gold chain from the Spanish galleon Nuestra Señora de Atocha 
© ArtAncient 
 
The jewels were on their way back to Europe when they were lost at sea.
In the three centuries that Spain presided over Latin America, it extracted massive amounts of wealth: 150,000 tonnes of silver by some estimates, as well as gold, copper, emeralds, amethysts and more.
These riches powered an empire, funding its wars, building its palaces, servicing debts and buying foreign goods.
Every year, fleets of galleons set sail for Spain.
But many ships never made it home.
Some sank in foul weather or shallow waters; others were downed by enemy combatants.
More than 700 Spanish wrecks still lie submerged off the coasts of the Bahamas and the US, according to the Spanish ministry of culture, which has produced an inventory of the lost ships.
Only 25 per cent of these have been precisely located and, of those, only a handful have had their treasures recovered.
So how did ArtAncient come to own this rare shipwreck gold? Before retrieving the Maravillas’s treasures from the sea, Humphreys negotiated salvage rights to the vessel with the government of the Bahamas.
In exchange for funding the discovery of the wreck and the recovery of its cargo, he would keep three quarters of everything he found; the rest would go to the Bahamas.

Mel Fisher with some of the treasure he recovered from the vessel Nuestra Señora de Atocha © Mel Fisher’s Treasures 
 
A few years earlier, Fisher had retrieved an estimated $400mn in gold, silver and emeralds from the Atocha, following a 16-year search for the vessel.
He kept all of it following a 1982 ruling by the US Supreme Court that blocked the State of Florida from claiming a share.
Salvaged by Humphreys and Fisher respectively, the rosa de pecho, belt fittings and gold chain were then offered at Christie’s in London in 1990, where they were acquired by the late Robin Symes, the disgraced antiquities dealer linked to the trade in looted artefacts.
After Symes declared bankruptcy in 2003, his gallery stock was seized by liquidators and ArtAncient purchased the Spanish gold from them.
“Because of the Symes connection, we did a lot of due diligence, tracing each piece back to the moment it was recovered from the seabed.
The legal status is solid,” says Sverdloff.

A diver recovers a gold bar  . . .  ...

and emerald jewels from the Maravillas wreck 
© Diving the Maravillas 
 
ArtAncient’s shipwreck gold comes from an era of treasure hunting that is now over; the commercial market for these works is restricted to pieces recovered from only a handful of wrecks such as the Maravillas and the Atocha because Spain chose not to dispute their ownership in the 1980s.
It has since changed tack.
In 2000, Spain asserted its sovereignty in US courts over two navy frigates found off the coast of Virginia and won.
In 2012, it won again in a dispute over the ownership of the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes, which went down in 1804 on its way from Peru to Spain after it was sunk by a British warship.
The US salvage company Odyssey Marine Exploration had located the wreck in 2007 and recovered 17 tonnes of silver and gold coins.
After Spain sued and won in the US, the salvage company was forced to hand over all of its treasure.

‘Four Frigates Capturing Spanish Treasure Ships’ (1804) by Francis Sartorius
© National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London 
 
“US courts now tend to find against the salvager and in favour of, for example, Spain,” says Tim Maxwell, head of art law at the London firm Wedlake Bell, adding that it is a contentious area given the competing interests between preservation of underwater cultural heritage and the sometimes huge financial values involved.
For most governments, the only plausible way to recover wrecks is to form a partnership with a reputable salvage company.
“It costs hundreds of thousands a day to have a boat at sea looking for shipwrecks; so you likely need private capital to do this kind of speculative exploration.
Equally, you don’t want private salvage companies putting conveyor belts on the seabed and just wiping out anything of archaeological interest in order to recover gold or jewels.”
These days, formerly colonised countries are likely to assert their rights more vigorously in defiance of Spanish claims.
A case in point is the fight over the San José, a Spanish ship sunk by the British near Cartagena, Colombia, in 1708.
Its wreck is believed to conceal the richest haul of any lost ship in history.
Almost all of it still lies submerged, protected by the Colombian navy.
A US salvage company is now claiming $10bn from the government of Colombia, arguing this is its share of the San José treasure.
A decision on the dispute by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague is pending.
Spain’s attempt to join the arbitration was rejected by the court.
With technological advances making the discovery of shipwrecks easier, perhaps the only certainty in this field is the array of competitors — treasure hunters, salvage companies and nation states — racing to claim riches still buried at sea. 
 
Links :

Thursday, November 12, 2026

Famed ocean liner SS United States to be sunk on Veterans Day


From Maritime Executive

On Monday, the storied ocean liner SS United States departed Mobile, Alabama for her final journey to an artificial reef site off the coast of Florida, and she will be heading for the bottom sooner than expected.
Her controlled sinking will occur Wednesday, a day ahead of schedule; a planned goodbye ceremony on Thursday has been canceled, the Okaloosa County's board of commissioners has announced.

Reefing operations are weather-dependent, like any complex and safety-sensitive evolution at sea, and the organizers of the reefing project had cautioned in advance that the exact timing would vary depending upon the forecast.
The planned Thursday sinking date has now been advanced to Wednesday due to "forecast heavy winds and unsafe weather conditions" expected later in the week, the county board said. It is also a fitting tribute to hold the event on Veterans Day, Okaloosa County Board Chairman Trey Goodwin told local media.

The sinking operation will begin at 1300 hours on Wednesday afternoon.
Since the ship is going down early, the planned sendoff ceremony for Thursday afternoon has been canceled - but the county will still hold a live televised viewing of the site for the public at a nearby bar in Destin, Florida.
 

Localization with the GeoGarage platform (NOOA raster chart)
 
Divers will be able to access the wreck from Thursday onwards, and substantial boat traffic is expected.
SS United States is expected to settle to the bottom at 30° 07.148' N, 86° 46.755' W.


 
The small non-profit previously held custody of the ship, the SS United States Conservancy.
After selling the ship, it has promised to start a museum as part of a visitor's center.

Several groups of affeccionados also emerged and have fought the reefing project since it was first proposed in 2024.
Last week, one of the groups filed a last-minute federal suit seeking a restraining order to prevent the ship from departing the pier, but Judge M. Casey Rodgers of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida denied the request. 

SS United States departs Mobile under tow on her final voyage (Courtesy Okaloosa County)

Built at Newport News, the SS United States entered service in 1952 and set a new record as the fastest passenger ship to cross the Atlantic.
She operated for just 17 years before retirement, her capabilities made obsolete by the advent of air travel (and by her high bunkering costs).
After years in U.S. government ownership, her title passed from hand to hand among various private owners.
The Conservancy's hope was to find a permanent berth where the ship could be redeveloped for a commercial purpose, but no economically viable proposals emerged.
Instead, the vessel will become what Okaloosa County believes to be the world's largest artificial reef, nearly 1,000 feet in length and 53,000 GRT in volume. 
 

Links :

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

The Gulf of Saint-Malo on a spring tide


Sea level and surface current through one day of spring tide.
Between Brittany and the Cotentin the tide rises and falls by up to about 13 metres in the bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, one of the largest ranges in the world. 
North of the Channel Islands the same tide runs through the Raz Blanchard at around 10 knots.
Model: E.U. Copernicus Marine Service, IBI Analysis and Forecast (IBI_ANALYSISFORECAST_PHY_005_001), every 30 minutes at 1/36°. 
 
Saint Malo tide on NavimetriX
 

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Falklands: Argentina's new legal dispute over the Sea Lion Oil project

The Falkland Islands seen from the International Space Station, 2018 (NASA)

 From Maritime Executive by Donald R. Rothwell

The longstanding Argentina-United Kingdom Falkland Islands dispute is back in the global headlines.
The UK endorsement of the offshore “Sea Lion” project in waters to the north of the islands has seen Argentina respond by commencing a legal challenge.

The Sea Lion hydrocarbon exploitation licences have been granted to Navitas Petroleum operating in conjunction with Rockhopper Exploration in an area located approximately 107 nautical miles to the north of the islands, covering 541km2.
Argentina’s legal challenge is under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and is two pronged via an initial request for provisional measures before the Hamburg-based International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), with a final determination by an Arbitral Tribunal to follow.
ITLOS hearings are scheduled for 10–11 November 2026 and a decision on that phase of the case can be expected soon after.
 
Falklands islands with the GeoGarage platform

While Argentina has framed its claim around UNCLOS, the core of the case is the territorial dispute over the islands, referred to as Malvinas by Argentina.
This longstanding dispute has its roots in European settlement throughout parts of South America, a British outpost being established and then abandoned in the 18th century, followed by a more permanent British presence on East Falkland and West Falkland from the 19th century until today.
The islands have an approximate population of 3,500 and formally are a “British Overseas Territory” (BOT) along with other such territories including Bermuda and Gibraltar.

Argentina’s claim to the Malvinas is founded in “Papal Bulls”, which were effectively pontifical decrees dividing parts of the Roman Catholic world, in this case Spanish interests in South America.
Argentina argues these were given legal substance by the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas and were reflected in the early contests between Britain and Spain over the islands.

However, there has never been a permanent Argentine settlement on the islands other than temporary military occupation during the 1982 Falklands War following Argentina’s invasion.
Since the war’s conclusion an uneasy peace settled over the islands.
Argentina has never relinquished its claim, while the UK sought to conclusively demonstrate the islanders wished to remain British, with a 2013 referendum voting by a 99.8% majority to remain as a BOT.
The Sea Lion project has inevitably provoked Argentina to now explore its legal options in pursuit of its claim over the islands.
Argentina’s UNCLOS legal case is that the UK is illegally exploiting the continental shelf seabed to the north of the islands, that Sea Lion will result in environmental impact and damage, and that the UK’s conduct in issuing the Sea Lion exploration licences is an aggravation of the dispute over the maritime areas adjacent to the islands.
Absent the underlying territorial dispute, these would all be legitimate issues for ITLOS determination.
 

However, as both Argentina and the UK are UNCLOS parties, the Tribunal will first need to ask whether it has jurisdiction to determine the dispute and this is where Argentina will face some challenges.
ITLOS, as a tribunal established under UNCLOS, has under Article 286 jurisdiction to determine disputes “concerning the interpretation or application” of the convention.
As such, it does not have the jurisdictional capacity to determine territorial disputes under general international law.
In practice, these are matters traditionally within the remit of the International Court of Justice.

There are examples of UNCLOS law of the sea cases in which territorial disputes have also been central.
The most prominent was the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration where the Philippines challenged China’s conduct in the region.
While the South China Sea is riddled with territorial disputes, especially over multiple islands, rocks and reefs in the Spratley Island group, the Philippines neatly sidestepped this issue and instead focused on China’s maritime claims, island reclamation activity, and artificial island building within areas of the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone.
Accordingly, there was never a need for a determination to be made as to who had territorial sovereignty over what feature.
This will not be the case with respect to the Falklands/Malvinas.
If the UK has sovereignty over the islands, then Sea Lion is a legitimate act of exploration and exploitation of the continental shelf.
If the Argentine claim over the islands is valid, then the UK’s conduct is in breach of UNCLOS.
 

Map showing exploratory oil field (Sea Lion) in North Falklands Basin and exploratory oil wells in East Falklands Basin. Pensoft/Researchgate, CC BY-ND
 
Argentina’s claim could therefore fall at the first hurdle, and Buenos Aires is no doubt aware of this challenge.
ITLOS, however, has generally been reluctant to take a narrow view of its jurisdiction and to deny hearing a case brought before it.
In this context, another ITLOS case regarding the Chagos Archipelago – which had been the subject of an International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion over its status as a BOT – and where Mauritius was seeking to settle a maritime boundary with the Maldives, did proceed to a full determination despite the sovereignty dispute between Mauritius and the UK not being fully resolved at that time.

All the indications are that Argentina will explore all legal and associated diplomatic and political avenues to block the Sea Lion project.
Argentine President Javier Milei may also be seeking to provoke nationalist pride in advance 2027 Presidential elections in which he is expected to run once more.
US President Donald Trump may also intervene due to his unhappiness that the UK did not provide him with more support in Iran.
He already indicated in September that the US may shift its position on the Falklands away from supporting the UK claim.

London will inevitably robustly defend its position on all fronts.
If the UNCLOS case proceeds it will be historic and the first occasion any aspect of the Falklands/Malvinas dispute has gone before an international court.

Links :