Tuesday, September 1, 2026

We’ll soon get a glimpse of future temperatures, thanks to this record El Niño

(Ben Noll/The Washington Post; Zeke Hausfather)

From WashingtonPost by y Ben Noll
 
It will act like a climate time machine, temporarily pushing temperatures to levels that otherwise might not be felt for a decade or so. 
 
This year’s record-smashing El Niño will do more than just shift and enhance patterns of heat, extreme rainfall and drought around the world.
It will also give the planet a preview of the late 2030s.

That’s because this El Niño will act like a climate time machine, temporarily pushing global temperatures to levels that might nototherwise be reached for another decade or so.

According to an analysis by climate scientist Zeke Hausfather that was shared with The Washington Post, there’s around a 95 percent chance that 2027 will become Earth’s hottest year on record — soaring past the last record in 2024 — because the combination of El Niño and climate change could spike global temperatures to around 1.76 degrees Celsius (3.17 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial averages.


Described as “stunning” by Hausfather, who researches and analyzes the climate for Stripe, Carbon Brief and Berkeley Earth, this value would be so far above the warming trend of the past decade that it could bring global temperatures to levels not otherwise expected under that trend until around 2037.
“I’m not sure folks have realized just how crazy the second half of 2026 and 2027 will be for global temperatures — on the back of a record-smashing El Niño event,” wrote Hausfather on X.

Next year is strongly favored to become the planet’s warmest on record




It’s currently close to a coin flip whether 2026 would become the warmest year on record, according to Hausfather’s analysis, which considers the average of several different temperature datasets. It’s possible that 2026 sets a record in some, but not all, of these datasets.
Jim Hansen, director of the Program on Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions at Columbia University, said he expects 2026 to become the warmest year, but to hold that crown only until 2027 exceeds it.

There is a much stronger signal for record warmth in 2027 because increasing air temperatures caused by El Niño lag slightly behind increasing ocean temperatures.
A global temperature of 1.76 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels in 2027 would be about 0.29 degrees Celsius higher than what’s expected based on the warming trend of the past decade.
According to Hausfather’s temperature predictions for next year, the middle 50 percent of forecasts range from 1.67 degrees Celsius to 1.85 degrees Celsius above the preindustrial average.
At the high end of that range, global temperatures in 2027 would jump roughly 13 years ahead of the recent warming trend, reaching levels that might otherwise become typical around 2040. The low end would represent a 7-year-boost, to around 2034.
Hausfather said that this El Niño event is happening on top of a “strong acceleration in the rate of warming associated with continued emissions of greenhouse gases.”

Both Hausfather and Hansen also mentioned that decreasing atmospheric aerosols — which have historically offset some warming — are contributing to the acceleration in warming.
Although Hausfather expects 2028 to be cooler than 2027, he added that “human emissions are adding a permanent El Niño worth of heat to the climate system each decade.”

In other words, global temperatures in 2027 will take a big but temporary upward stairstep, and they are unlikely to permanently continue at or above those levels for now.
These temperature increases will also have consequences for atmospheric water vapor. Because the water vapor-carrying capacity of air increases at a rate of 7 percent per degree Celsius, it’s possible — if not likely — that 2027 also sets a new global moisture record, surpassing 2024. In 2025, The Post mapped the planet’s rising moisture zones and showed how they are closely connected to an increasing risk for rainfall extremes.

The role of El Niño

 
This year’s El Niño is predicted to peak in December, but its impacts will continue long into 2027. (Ben Noll/The Washington Post/ECMWF)

During El Niño, huge stores of ocean heat from the western Pacific spread eastward, eventually reaching the west coast of South America. Thunderstorm activity shifts with that warmth, transferring heat from the ocean and pumping it high into the atmosphere. Winds and atmospheric circulation then redistribute that heat beyond the tropical Pacific and around the globe, raising global temperatures.
That’s why strong El Niño events often appear as an upward stairstep in long-term plots of global temperatures.
 
Ocean temperatures compared with average during the six strongest El Niño events on record before 2026. (Ben Noll/The Washington Post/NOAA)
 
But this El Niño isn’t just going to be strong. Boosted by the planet’s long-term warming trend, it’s probably going to dwarf the six strongest that came before it in 2015, 1997, 1982, 1972, 1888 and 1877 — the latter contributing to a global famine that caused 3 to 4 percent of the global population to perish.
Ocean temperatures in the central equatorial Pacific, where El Niño’s strength is measured, have already broken records for 75 days straight.

That streak isn’t expected to end anytime soon.
Temperatures in the equatorial Pacific Ocean may surge more than 4.0 degrees Celsius above average (7.2 degrees Fahrenheit) by December, breaking the previous record by more than a degree Celsius.

The Post is tracking these records on a regular basis — and mapping the potentially significant weather ripple effects — in an El Niño tracker.
Those weather effects will vary from place to place.
But the temperature spike will briefly push the entire planet into its warmer future.
About this story
Historical global temperature anomalies from Zeke Hausfather are based on an average of six datasets, sourced from NOAA, NASA, the UK Met Office, Berkeley Earth, ECMWF and the Japanese Meteorological Agency. The chance for a record in 2026 varies depending on which dataset is used.

Sea surface temperature forecasts for this year’s El Niño, from ECMWF, were compared with averages from 1993 to 2016 to calculate temperature anomalies. Sea surface temperatures during historical El Niño events were visualized using data from the NOAA-CIRES Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project and compared with averages from 1993 to 2015 to calculate temperature anomalies. Although several of these events occurred in the distant past before the satellite era, their patterns have been reconstructed from historical records, such as ship logs, to provide an estimate of the likely conditions.
 
Links :

Monday, August 31, 2026

Rock strike caused near-fatal grounding of tourist vessel in New Zealand

Evacuation of passengers from the Black Cat
(Credit: TVNZ via RNZ taken by a witness)

From The Maritime Executive


The near-fatal grounding and loss of a tourist catamaran in New Zealand waters early this year was caused by the vessel coming into contact with a known hazard after the master approached it from an “unusual direction.” 
That was the finding detailed in an interim report from New Zealand’s transportation authority.

The Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC) released its interim report detailing the grounding and subsequent total loss of the Black Cat catamaran on the morning of January 31, 2026.
The report shows the vessel was breached after coming into contact with the Archway Rock, a documented submerged rock.
Investigations so far indicate the master had approached the known hazard from an unusual direction.

Built in 1994, the Black Cat was a 17-meter catamaran owned by Black Cat Cruises and operated out of Akaroa, offering sightseeing tours from the South Island.
On the fateful day, the vessel was conducting a regular two-hour wildlife and scenic cruise with 38 passengers and three crewmembers aboard.
The vessel departed her berth at Akaroa Harbor at 1045 and visited various locations.
The weather was calm, prompting the master to decide to navigate outside Akaroa Harbor and visit Scenery Nook on the south coast, where they arrived around 1152.

 
 
Black Cat’s track from Scenery Nook to the beach at Nikau Palm Gully
(from the report) 
 
Visualization with the GeoGarage platform (Linz nautical raster chart NZ6364)
 
Localization with the NZ ENC (NZ406324)
The vessel approached Archway Rock from an "unusual direction".
It struck an underwater rock of unknown depth that was marked on navigational charts as a dangerous hazard

The report shows that upon approaching Scenery Nook, the master moved to the starboard bridge wing helm station to maneuver the vessel close to known rocks.
He then decided to visit Archway Rock on the way back to Akaroa.
At about 1207, the Black Cat left Scenery Nook, and the master moved back to the central bridge helm station so they could look at the chart plotter regarding their intended route.
The master then moved to the port bridge wing helm station and navigated toward Archway Rock.

About this time, one of the crewmembers noticed the vessel was approaching Archway Rock from an unusual direction.
Minutes later, the vessel struck the rock, causing a rupture to its hull and flooding, including in the engine.
The crew failed to activate the bilge pumping system because they were not confident in how to operate the system correctly.

Unable to pump the water, the master navigated the vessel into Akaroa Harbor to facilitate a safe evacuation.
The report shows that while in the harbor, the vessel’s steering and starboard engine had stopped operating and the emergency steering was not responding.
The vessel had developed a significant starboard list.
 
image : TAIC

Nearby vessels helped in evacuating the passengers while a Coastguard vessel that was exercising just outside Akaroa Harbor attempted to dewater the Black Cat using a portable petrol-powered water pump.
The efforts were unsuccessful, and the master tried to save the vessel by attempting to maneuver her towards the beach when it ran aground.
A salvage operation the following day failed to refloat and recover the vessel, which broke up in heavy weather conditions.

TAIC highlights that while the interim report presents facts that have been established so far, it intends to publish its final report on the incident upon completion of the investigations.
The final report will present analysis, discuss safety issues, and make recommendations.
 
Links :

Sunday, August 30, 2026

Global shipping traffic density

Saturday, August 29, 2026

Image of tyhe week : icy window


One of the most unusual images was captured from beneath the sea ice north of Svalbard, Norway.
Photographer Audun Rikardsen had spotted polar bear tracks close to a seal breathing hole. He drilled another hole nearby and placed a camera beneath the ice, attaching a motion sensor.
Around eight hours later, a polar bear arrived and looked down through the opening, producing the striking image titled Icy Window.
Seals use gaps in the sea ice to surface for air, but the same openings can also provide opportunities for polar bears hunting for prey.
source : Scubaverse 

Friday, August 28, 2026

The promise and the pitfalls of China’s new Arctic shipping route

illustration: the economist / getty images

The Northern Sea Route is a pricey and risky alternative to the Suez Canal

For a world newly preoccupied with maritime choke points, the voyage of the Dubai Tower offers a flicker of promise.
The container ship set off from the Chinese port of Ningbo on August 15th to begin the first regular cargo service between Asia and Europe via the Arctic Ocean.
Sea Legend, the vessel’s Chinese owner, says that it will complete the 5,000km journey to Felixstowe, on Britain’s east coast, in about 20 days.
That is roughly twice as fast as sailing the usual route via the Suez Canal.
Crucially, the “Arctic Express” (as the company calls the service) avoids the risk of being entangled in the Middle East’s military conflicts.

 
map: the economist

For a world newly preoccupied with maritime choke points, the voyage of the Dubai Tower offers a flicker of promise.
The container ship set off from the Chinese port of Ningbo on August 15th to begin the first regular cargo service between Asia and Europe via the Arctic Ocean.
Sea Legend, the vessel’s Chinese owner, says that it will complete the 5,000km journey to Felixstowe, on Britain’s east coast, in about 20 days.
That is roughly twice as fast as sailing the usual route via the Suez Canal.
Crucially, the “Arctic Express” (as the company calls the service) avoids the risk of being entangled in the Middle East’s military conflicts.map: the economist
The new service via the so-called Northern Sea Route (nsr), which runs through the Bering Strait and over the top of Russia, is an early test of China’s Arctic ambitions.
In 2018 the country outlined plans to develop shipping routes, mining and infrastructure in the Arctic, hoping to take advantage of rapidly receding polar ice.
Many of the plans, which are marketed collectively as a “polar silk road”, have met resistance.
Seven of the eight countries with Arctic territory are Western democracies.
They worry that China is working closely with Russia in the region and that Chinese activities there could be useful for future military purposes, such as operating submarines.
Some bridled at China, whose northernmost point is on about the same latitude as Hamburg, declaring itself a “near-Arctic state”.
Nonetheless China hopes to attract fresh interest in the northern route from governments and companies alarmed by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the threat from Iranian-backed Houthi fighters to shipping in the Red Sea.
China is also more anxious than ever about its own reliance on the narrow Malacca Strait, the hinge between the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, through which most of its energy imports pass.
And China will soon not be alone on the nsr.
In June Japan said that it would revise its Arctic policy to promote the route.
A South Korean shipping company, PanStar, plans to send one of its container ships on a trial run through the Arctic Ocean on August 22nd, aiming to complete the voyage from Busan to Felixstowe in just 18 days.
It’s no sleigh ride
Thanks to climate change, conditions for the nsr are likely to grow more favourable.
The minimum summer extent of Arctic ice has been shrinking by more than 12% a decade.
In March the maximum extent of winter ice reached its lowest level since records began in 1979.
On August 16th, the latest available reading, Arctic ice covered 5.5m square kilometres.
That is well below the median extent of ice on the same date in the years between 1981 and 2010 but above the lowest ever extent, recorded in 2012.
That September, the ice shrank to just 3.4m square kilometres.
One selling point for Sea Legend’s service is that a shorter sailing time means less fuel burned—fuel accounts for seven-tenths of shipping costs.
That also reduces carbon emissions.
And cooler weather on the Northern Sea Route is better for transporting some high-tech goods that are sensitive to temperature.
Without refrigeration, temperatures inside containers on the Suez Canal route can reach 60°C.
The Dubai Tower is carrying goods including batteries, solar modules and electric-vehicle components, mainly from cities in China’s Yangzi river delta.
For all those apparent advantages, the Arctic Express also highlights the limitations of the nsr.
It will run only from August to October, when the route is largely free of ice.
Sea Legend plans eight voyages in that window, using seven vessels.
For the rest of the year, only ships with reinforced hulls may navigate the Arctic.
Sea Legend has bought or leased some of these, but only relatively small ones, as they are costly and in short supply.
They may also need to be escorted by Russian nuclear-powered icebreakers.
All the extra costs erode the northern route’s price advantage.
So do insurance premiums.
They are usually higher for the nsr than for the Suez Canal, despite war-risk premiums for the canal.
They are also 40% higher than for sailing around the Cape of Good Hope, the chief alternative to the Suez Canal.
Allianz, an insurance giant, warned in its recent annual safety review of the shipping industry that the remote Arctic route posed significant extra risks because of its harsh weather and the limited infrastructure available for repairs, assistance, rescue or salvage.
It said that machinery damage or failure caused almost half of the reported shipping incidents in Arctic waters in the past decade.
The environmental impact is potentially greater, too.
Bellona, a Norwegian environmental group, warned in a report last year that in the Arctic there are no effective ways to deal with fuel spills because of the difficulty of cleaning up fuel in cold conditions and the distance from emergency-response centres.
(The International Maritime Organisation has banned the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic since 2024, though Russia does not heed the ban.) Noise pollution from ships also affects marine mammals such as whales and walruses in the Arctic more than elsewhere, since low-frequency sounds travel farther in cold water.
Ships on the northern route pass through vital feeding and breeding grounds.
International carriers avoid the route in large part because of geopolitical risk.
Ships on the nsr often need permits, ice-breaking services or other assistance from Russia, potentially violating Western sanctions linked to its war in Ukraine.
Shipping may in future be disrupted by an intensifying contest between Russia and other countries to control the region’s ample mineral resources.
The Arctic, once preserved as a zone of peace, is becoming increasingly militarised, as Donald Trump continues to threaten Greenland and nato seeks to deter Russian aggression on its northern flank.
All this helps to explain why total transit cargo on the Northern Sea Route was just 3.2m tonnes in 2025, up from about 3m the year before.
That is tiny compared with about 464m tonnes through the Suez Canal last year.
The bulk of Arctic shipping is between Russian and Chinese ports, rather than between Asia and Europe, much of it consisting of shipments of Russian oil or gas.
In a recent report, the Clingendael Institute, a Dutch think-tank, concluded that the route’s “most viable function…remains that of a selective corridor for Arctic resource exports.”
Still, as Malte Humpert of the Arctic Institute in Washington argues, the nsr will grow in importance for China as a seasonal trade corridor for when traditional routes are disrupted.
He envisages hundreds of annual container passages a decade hence.
“The question is when Western operators decide to re-enter the market—and more importantly, whether they still can,” Mr Humpert says.
Arctic navigation requires training and operational experience, and “China and South Korea are building that expertise now.”
For the moment, Sea Legend admits, the tight seasonal window and limited capacity of its Arctic service make it hard to compete with conventional routes.
But it is already planning to expand the navigational window to four months by 2028 and eventually to the entire year.
Further conflict in the Middle East could provide incentives for it and other companies to invest in larger, ice-strengthened ships.
And if temperatures in the Arctic continue to rise three times faster than the global annual average, then doubts about the viability of the nsr may recede as fast as China’s ambitions for the region grow.
 
Links :