Monday, October 12, 2026

Jimmy Cornell, the ARC mastermind on routing: ‘Sailing your own boat is still the most rewarding way to explore our planet’

 
From YachtingWorld by Jimmy Cornell
 
Jimmy Cornell has spent half a century sailing and mapping the globe.
He shares how bluewater cruising and ocean routing have changed.
 
When I started planning my first voyage in the early 1970s there was only one book dealing specifically with ocean routing: the British Admiralty Ocean Passages for the World, first published in 1895.

The edition available (the third, published in 1973), had very little information relevant for sailing yachts with its focus on well-established commercial routes.
While those details still made interesting reading, they were very different from those routes sailed by modern cruising yachts. 


Jimmy Cornell sets off from London at the start of his 1975 round the world voyage.
Photo: Jimmy Cornell


As I started preparing for my passage from La Palma to Barbados in November 1976, the only information for a passage from the Canary Islands to the Caribbean was to proceed west on a great circle route and cross the 25° parallel between 25° and 30° to reach the north-east trade winds as soon as possible.
It also mentioned the risk of tropical storms between June and mid-November.

So this is what I did.
We left La Palma on 15 November, crossed the 25° parallel six days later, but it took us five more days to find steady north-east winds.
We arrived in Barbados on 11 December, having sailed 2,697 miles in 26 days.

All through our six-year 58,000-mile voyage I gathered material on offshore routes, wind and weather conditions, and on my return started work on the kind of book that I’d have liked to have had when I was planning our round the world voyage. 

Photo: Oyster World Rally

My research took me from the British Library to the Maritime Museum in Greenwich, where I was given permission to study the original logbooks of ships that had roamed the oceans in previous centuries.
I was even allowed to consult Captain Cook’s original logs, and I can still feel the thrill of seeing the neat writing of the man whom I regard as the greatest navigator of all times.

My own experience, and the lessons learned from those captains, have formed the basis of my attitude to routing.
Put simply, it is to do your best to be in the right place at the right time and, conversely, to avoid being in the wrong place at the wrong time. 


Making landfall in the Caribbean marks the first ocean passage for many world voyagers. 
Photo: Grand Large Yachting World Odyssey 

First-hand experience


The tactics outlined in the first edition of World Cruising Routes, and those that followed, observed that basic principle, but also attempted to help cruisers benefit from favourable sailing conditions.

World Cruising Routes listed the favourable periods for every passage, the safest time, with details of tropical storm seasons and areas affected by them, the UK and US charts for the area to be sailed, and the cruising guides covering the destination area.
The accompanying comments referred to prevailing winds and currents, local conditions, suggested tactics for that route, and recommended landfalls.

It was very much influenced by the experience gained, and the observations made, during my first round the world voyage between 1975 and 1981.
During the voyage with my wife, Gwenda, and our two young children, we’d made detours to many places off the usual sailing routes, sometimes becoming the first yacht to have called there. 

Finding paradise: technology has changed ocean voyaging, but the need for verified information remains constant.
Photo: James Tomlinson/Oyster World Rally

World Cruising Routes also reflected my own style of navigation.
Our first Aventura’s navigation system was quite rudimentary with only a sextant, a battery-operated depth sounder and a radio direction finder (RDF).

The latter was only useful for inshore navigation within 25 to 30 miles of land where it was possible to tune into AM stations or coastal radio beacons to calculate your position by triangulation.
On offshore passages, astronavigation was the only way to work out where you were. 

Setting off on a bluewater adventure is still the greatest way to explore the world! 
Photo: Tor Johnson
 
Changing tech

Over four decades World Cruising Routes has evolved – both reflecting my own peripatetic sailing life, and also the arrival of revolutionary aids to navigation, from GPS to satellite communications and AIS to electronic charts, and their impact on offshore navigation.

These developments made it possible for the second edition, published in 1990, to list waypoints for each route.
New routes were added as boats ventured further afield, and new cruising grounds were being discovered.
More detailed landfall information, as well as official ports of entry and clearance formalities, were included to assist in passage planning. 


A routing error saw Volvo Race yacht Team Vestas Wind wrecked on charted shoals in the Indian Ocean. 
Photo: NCG Operations Room, MRCC Mauritius/Getty

In the following years, on Aventura II, I completed my second circumnavigation and became increasingly aware of several changes in weather conditions compared to the past.

I noted some of these changes in the third edition (published 1995), and many of the points remain salient today:

‘Sailing routes depend primarily on weather, which changes little over the years.
However, possibly as a result of the profound changes that have occurred in the ecological balance of the world environment, there have been several freak weather conditions in recent years.
‘Their most worrying aspect is that they are rarely predicted, occur in the wrong season, and often in places where they have not been known before.
‘The unimaginable force of mega­hurricanes should be a warning of worse things to come.’ 


There are now multiple options for a world tour, including rallies organised by brands such as Grand Large.
Photo: Grand Large Yachting World Odyssey 

Innovations

Future editions took into account the observations I had made from the growing popularity of the transatlantic and round the world rallies that I was running at the time, and my own voyages to Antartica and Alaska.

But the arrival of chartplotters and electronic charts in the early 2000s was the most fundamental innovation in offshore navigation since the invention of the sextant.

The benefits in terms of both safety and accuracy were unquestioned until the running aground of the 65ft yacht Team Vestas Wind in November 2014 during the Volvo Ocean Race.
Vestas was wrecked on the St Brandon reef, north of Mauritius in the South Indian Ocean.
The navigator had failed to zoom in far enough on the electronic chart to notice the shallow reef.
That area, known as the Cargados Carajos Shoals, is clearly marked on paper charts. 

Approaching Nuku Hiva in the Marquesas. 
Photo: Rick Tomlinson/Oyster World Rally

My immediate reaction on hearing about the grounding was to check my book, and it was indeed mentioned as a hazard.
However, I’d not have expected my book to be on board a racing yacht.
Nor, for that matter, on a submarine! 
One of the greatest compliments I ever received came from a most unexpected direction.

While in Las Palmas before the start of the ARC, a participant who had been an officer in the Royal Navy barged into my office and exclaimed, “Jimmy, you will never believe this.
I have just visited a British nuclear submarine that is here on a goodwill mission and guess what? On the shelf above the nav table I saw a copy of your Routes!”

I asked the captain why on earth he’d carry that doorstopper of a book with him? 
“He responded: ‘So I know where those silly yachts go, to be extra careful not to smash into one when we surface’.” 


Spinnaker sailing between San Blas and Portobelo, Panama.
Photo: Rick Tomlinson/Oyster World Rally

I made sure the seventh edition (2014), mentioned all known hazards in areas crossed by sailing routes by giving their coordinates, and listing waypoints that avoid isolated reefs, unlit atolls, offshore oil fields and wind farms.

We also revised some route planning tactics on popular cruising routes based on the work we did for Cornells’ Ocean Atlas (2011), which included information on changes that had occurred in the wind systems of the world based on 20 years of satellite observations. 

Cornell and family’s first circumnavigation aboard Aventura.
Photo: Jimmy Cornell





All the luckiest kids I know spent their childhoods messing about in boats.
They had water-loving parents and garages filled… 



Our hulls cut through the translucent waters of the lagoon around Fiji’s largest island, Viti Levu.
As we make our… 

Changing routes

The growing interest among cruisers in sailing to more challenging destinations was reflected in the eighth edition (2018), which was expanded to include several high latitude routes.
It was published soon after my own successful transit of the Northwest Passage on Aventura IV, in some ways a trip that became possible due to the consequences of climate change.

My concern for the current state of the ocean environment stems from my own observations during five decades of roaming the seas of the world and noticing the disastrous changes that have occurred over the years.
One of the most noticeable phenomena is the decrease in the regularity and reliability of trade winds, as witnessed by sailors on some of the frequently travelled ocean routes.

However, the most significant change has been the increased intensity and extent of tropical cyclones, both in the duration of the critical seasons and the areas affected.
As this phenomenon has such a major impact on voyage planning, and safety generally, the ninth edition of World Cruising Routes (2022) highlighted relevant information for areas of the world affected. 


Mururoa Atoll in French Polynesia – site of French nuclear tests between 1966 and 1996.
Photo: Patrick Durand/Sygma/Getty


To find out how today’s sailors view this crucial topic I conducted a survey among long distance sailors, the significant majority of whom had completed a circumnavigation in recent years.
All were acutely aware of this new challenge and stated that they’d either revise or modify their future plans accordingly.
Only a few were prepared to abandon them.

On that note, I wish to reassure all those who are planning a voyage, that sailing on your own boat is still the best and most rewarding way to explore our planet.
Don’t leave it too late. 

Jimmy Cornell is the doyen of modern ocean cruising.
He founded the Atlantic Rally for Cruisers (ARC) transatlantic rally in 1986.
Photo: Jimmy Cornell

 
In the dark

My most frightening experience during my first world voyage in the 1970s is an example of what it meant to navigate through a critical area in those pre-GPS days.

Having reached the Pacific Ocean via the Panama Canal in late 1976, rather than take the traditional route to French Polynesia via the Galapagos Islands, we decided to get there by a rarely sailed route via Peru, Easter Island, Pitcairn and on to Mangareva, in the Gambier Islands.
We had a wonderful reception there as the only sailing yacht to call in over a year.

When the time came to resume our voyage, we encountered a complication.
France was conducting nuclear tests on the Mururoa and Tangataufa atolls, and we had to obtain permission from the French authorities for the passage to Tahiti.
When the response came, I was alarmed to see that it prescribed a route that had to clear the prohibited area around the nuclear testing sites by 50 miles. 


High latitudes sailing has increased in popularity, such as this 2024 transit of the Northwest Passage by three Garcia yachts.
Photo: Garcia Yachts


The suggested route cut across the southern Tuamotus, past the uninhabited atolls of Maria, Tureia and Vanavana, set among a cluster of similar hazards in that notorious area aptly called the Dangerous Archipelago by Captain Cook. 


Cornell’s circumnavigation routes in various Aventuras from 1975 to 2021.
Photo: Jimmy Cornell


The rules were very strict and did not allow for any deviation from the approved route.
We simply had no choice.

With Maria at a distance of 90 miles from Mangareva, we left late in the day planning to sail during the night in open waters and pass the atoll in daylight.
At daybreak the following morning I was shocked to see Maria’s low-profile peeping over the horizon several miles behind us. 

South-east Asia is becoming popular among cruisers looking to extend their voyaging.
Photo: David Bristow


A quick sun sight showed that in the night we’d gained some 20 miles on our estimated position having been driven by a swift north-west-setting current, and we’d sailed past the unlit Maria in the darkness.

By now my astronavigation had become reasonably accurate – usually to within five miles of our actual location – so throughout the day I kept taking sights and by nightfall I reckoned to have some 100 miles of open water ahead of us.
This gave us a safety margin of about 90 miles after allowing for an estimated 2.5-knot current at a speed of 5 knots.

My main concern was that, pushed by a stronger current, as had happened during the previous night, it was a distance we could easily cover in the 12 hours of darkness. 

San Blas islands off Panama, the traditional jump-off point for a Pacific crossing.
Photo: Rick Tomlinson / Oyster World Rally


We depended entirely on the classic dead reckoning navigation.
Every hour I wrote down in the logbook the course steered, and the distance covered, the latter based on readings provided by the trailing log.
The counter indicated our speed through the water, which allowed me to calculate our estimated speed and thus the distance.
Hence the term dead reckoning – not exactly rocket science. 

Looking forward to adventure at the start of of an ARC+ event.
Photo: Paul Wyeth/WCC


During the squally night, the overcast sky made it impossible to take any star sights, so I tried to slow down by reducing sail, but in the 20- to 25-knot wind it didn’t make much difference.
I spent a gut-wrenching night peering blindly ahead into the darkness and listening out for the boom of swell breaking on a windward reef.

Just as dawn started lightening the eastern horizon, I glimpsed straight ahead of us, at less than half a mile distance, the tell-tale white line of breakers.
Tureia! I altered course to port, and steered Aventura at a safe distance off the southern edge of the atoll. 

Cornell’s initial research included Captain Cook’s Endeavour log books.
This from 1770 records his first sighting of the previously unknown eastern coast of Australia.
Photo: Heritage Images/Getty


In the half-light the atoll looked much smaller than I’d expected, but thought that might be an optical illusion.
It was only a couple of hours later, when the sun was high enough to take a sight, that I managed to work out our approximate position – and realised with an almighty shock that the atoll we’d just passed had been in fact Vanavana, and that a stronger than expected current had pushed us much further west than I’d allowed for.

We’d passed Tureia in the dark without seeing it, a discrepancy in my estimation of some 40 miles.
Another 10 minutes of darkness and we’d have been wrecked on Vanavana’s windward reef.
A Dangerous Archipelago indeed! 

The ARC celebrated its 40th running last year and has seen thousands of sailors make their first ocean voyage.
Photo: Paul Wyeth/WCC
 
Links : 

Sunday, October 11, 2026

An adventurer at heart... Canton-Paris on a Chinese junk in the 1980s...


A wild idea in the 1970s to build a traditional junk in the People’s Republic of China and sail it back to Paris by rounding the Cape of Good Hope... 
Nothing less than that! An adventure with friends—both guys and girls—who had no money but heads full of dreams...! 
 
Four years of adventures... Pirates and typhoons on the agenda.

Saturday, October 10, 2026

Cape Horn passage in schooner Wander Bird


Cape Horn Passage in Schooner Wander Bird is the story of a 1936 voyage around the tip of South America — told seventy-eight years later by the four-year-old boy who was aboard.

Friday, October 9, 2026

On a remote island, these GPS hackers are preparing for an invisible war

Example of spoofed smartphone

From BBC by Katherine Dunn

Energy grids, data networks, stock markets: how easy is it to shut down our modern world by attacking the systems that synchronise time and space?
Meet the jammers finding out.

Harald Hauglin is a toweringly tall man with a salt and pepper beard, wire-framed glasses, and an impish grin.
When I met him in September 2024, the pocket of his mandatory hi-vis vest displayed a patch showing a white rabbit on the run with a clock.

Hauglin is chief engineer of time and frequency metrology at the Norwegian Metrology Service.
He is also a "Nerd of the Northern Lights" – a nickname adopted by attendees at the 2024 Jammertest.


Andoya island with the GeoGarage platform (NHS raster chart)
 
Hosted annually by the Norwegian authorities, Jammertest is an open-air hacking festival set on a remote island 300km (186 miles) north of the Arctic Circle.

Its aim is simple but mind-bending: to use satellite signals to mess with time itself – and see if receivers in everything from clocks to drones can withstand the pressure.

At the heart of this experiment is a technology that runs much of our modern digital world: Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS).

We tend to think of satellite networks such as GPS as tools for navigation.
Yet they also do something else just as important: they transmit ultra-accurate time.
Power grids, telecommunications networks, stock markets, transit services and more all depend on the synchronisation provided by GNSS.

But the importance of GNSS to infrastructure also creates an Achilles' heel.
Satellite transmissions are weak, and can be overwhelmed or hijacked by stronger, nefarious signals.

Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, such interference has risen dramatically.
The most obvious impacts have been on aviation.
In May of this year, an RAF plane experienced GPS jamming near the Russian border, while in September 2025, the Swedish Transport Agency said that interference was a daily occurrence.

Norway's government is now one of several preparing for a world in which GNSS could become a strategic vulnerability.

So, is it possible to prepare for an attack on our sense of time and place itself? Each year, dozens of engineers, physicists and officials head to the Arctic Circle to find out.

Jammertest: The world's largest open resilience-check for satellite jamming


The setting for Jammertest is the village of Bleik on Andøya, a tiny, remote island often used to study the Aurora Borealis.
The picturesque venue resembles an engineering summer camp, the epic Arctic scenery and daily waffle buffet all part of the appeal.
Yet its purpose is deadly serious.

Jammertest was only in its third official year when I visited, but the idea of testing commercial GNSS receivers to see how they react under intense, if artificial, interference is not new.

For years, the US military has been running tests to show how receivers react when GNSS is manipulated, held at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.
These tests are tightly controlled, however, including what data can be shared after the fact.

The Norwegians take a diffrent approach, modelling the test event on the white-hat hackathons beloved in the tech industry, where hackers probe for chinks in cybersecurity armour to make software better.
Crucially, these tests are done openly, in full view of any visitors to Andøya, and attendees share the results of their tests with other government and commercial attendees on the final night of the event.

 
Katherine DunnJammertest, an open GNSS resilience test, is held annually at Andøya, Norway
(Credit: Katherine Dunn)

Over the several days I attended the 2024 Jammertest, I sat next to Hauglin in the log cabin-style Bleik Community House, trying not to spill coffee on expensive electronic equipment as he and his colleagues unleashed staged attacks.
The job involved feeding false information to receivers in everything from planes to cars to industrial equipment: about where they were located, and often, at what time.

Think of it like this.
If you are reading this story in London in September 2026, GNSS manipulation would feed you false information that, for example, you're in Lima, Peru – and it's September 2017.
 
The risks of extended and slow-burn 'jamming'

There are two main kinds of GNSS interference.
The first is jamming, or overwhelming signals so that the service is no longer available.
The second is spoofing – a hijacking of the radio waves, where a false location and time is offered to a GNSS receiver.

The most dangerous kinds of GNSS attacks are two-fold.

The first major risk is extended jamming: a sustained, total wipe-out of GNSS, long enough to run down back-up timing and cause scores of knock-on issues as the digital synchronisation stitching together our modern world begins to fray.

How long a power grid – or any modern digital system – can remain synchronised without access to GNSS comes down to how much money a government or company is willing to spend installing the physical stuff that GNSS otherwise makes irrelevant.
Largely, this is a combination of land-based clocks and fibre optic cables to transfer time with extreme precision.

The second, even worse scenario, is a slow-burn, sophisticated spoofing attack that isn't noticed or contained, and therefore never allows back-up systems to kick in.
This is essentially a timing-based sneak attack that could dislodge digital systems in one fell swoop.

Both these kinds of attacks go after GPS time, and both involve the most sophisticated and powerful levels of manipulation or disruption – comparable to elaborate cybersecurity attacks.

They are also the kind of attacks that Hauglin and the Metrology Service, alongside numerous companies who provide industrial time as a service, meet on Andøya to test out.

The aim is to explore how vast digital systems may cope in the short-term following an attack, multiple people told me.
For example, by establishing exactly how long the energy grids and mobile networks have before things start to go seriously wrong.

How to peel away space and time

On the first afternoon at the 2024 Jammerfest, there were two test-flights: a Norwegian rescue helicopter, and a small plane, flown by a pilot from Eurocontrol, the European aviation safety body.

I watched as manipulation of the GNSS signals fed false information to the receivers on both flights, creating location tracks that didn't reflect where the pilots had actually flown. 

The helicopter's location on the flight tracker appeared to move in countless overlapping, panicked swirls, like an anxious doodle on a page – manoeuvres a helicopter wouldn't, and couldn't, pull off in real life.
Later, the tracker showed Eurocontrol's test plane making a series of odd, paperclip like patterns in the sky, full of extreme, gut-churning turns.
In reality, the plane had been doing wide, graceful loops above the town.

On the second morning, I watched as Hauglin undertook more sophisticated disruption.
Over 40 minutes, he and his colleagues gradually raised the power of the spoofing equipment, strengthening the decoy signal: the electromagnetic equivalent of slowly overwhelming a system before it realises anything is wrong.
Like boiling a frog.

As the transmission from the sneaky antenna ramped up, a screen on a monitor mounted on the wall above us showed the area on Google Maps.
Steadily, a beacon marking our location moved, misleadingly, out into the Norwegian Sea.
 
What does it look like when we 'hack' time?

The impact on clocks was harder to see without complex equipment.
To track the "drift" caused by interference – the way a GNSS-synchronised clock can be forced to gradually peel away from the real time – it was necessary to compare GPS time to an uninterrupted reference time.
This reference time came via fibre-optic cables unspooled all the way to a GNSS-receiver on the other side of a mountain, where it was safe from interference.

I watched over Hauglin's shoulder as he showed me a chart that tracked the spoofed clock's drift, measured in nanoseconds, away from the reference time. 

 
attended Jammertest in 2024 (Credit: Katherine Dunn)

As Hauglin said, the issue is that we tend to take time for granted – and we certainly don't like to think of it as a weapon.
 
Can hacking be stopped?

New options to replace, or strengthen, GNSS are also being proposed or developed all the time.

Do you remember the white rabbit on Hauglin's shirt?
As well as a reference to the character in Lewis Carrol's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, the motif also represents White Rabbit – a precision timing system developed at Cern in Switzerland, which can deliver time accurately to less than a nanosecond.

This and other timing systems usually replace the reliance on satellites with fibre optic cables, and atomic reference clocks.
And they are much harder to hack.

But nearly everyone I spoke to agrees that there is no single alternative system that can match every service GNSS has come to provide.

"There is no silver bullet, which is why you need a combination of systems," says Dana Goward, who has campaigned for policies to protect GPS since 2013, as the co-founder of the Resilient Timing and Navigation Foundation.

In 2024, Goward told me he believed spoofing was only going to get worse – "it's cheap, it's easy" – and that one of the biggest risks could come from the other GNSS systems themselves.

In June 2026, those fears were realised when a group of experts warned that Russian satellites have beamed interference from above, disrupting GPS signals across Europe for brief periods.

In the past, GNSS interference was limited to a region or a border area, as radio signals from Earth can only travel so far.
Now, with interference also coming from above, nowhere and nothing will be off-limits.

Satellite navigation is essential to everyday life, from tracking your morning jog to landing air ambulances.
But as reliance on satellite navigation grows, so do the risks associated with its interruption, natural or intentional.
To strengthen European resilience in navigation, the European Space Agency (ESA) takes part annually in Jammertest.
Organised on the remote island of Andøya, Norway, Jammertest is the world’s largest open air testing campaign for jamming and spoofing resilience.
In September 2025, ESA engineers attended Jammertest with ESA’s mobile navigation lab to test how different systems respond to interference.
After this, the data are analysed to check which technologies perform the best against jamming and spoofing.
By bringing together academia, industry and governmental organisations, Jammertest helps make satellite navigation better for everyone and protects European assets.
 
More like this:

Given that so much of the Jammertest event for the Scandinavians was, implicitly, about preparing for the risk of some kind of attack by Russia, I was slightly curious that the 2024 event was being held so openly.
The level of security, and the presence of Norwegian intelligence, was discrete.

The openness, however, is also part of its point.

"Is it also to show: 'we are becoming more resilient? We're dealing with this?'" I asked Tomas Levin, the senior engineer for the roads administration, and one of the organisers of Jammertest.
"Of course," he said.
"So come on, Russia, go ahead."
 
Links :

Thursday, October 8, 2026

Captain's decision led to yacht grounding, says NTSB

6 Saturdays in the boatyard after the grounding, on November 22, 2024.​​NTSB

From Baird by Alan Bosworth

The US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has determined that the probable cause of the grounding of the recreational vessel 6 Saturdays near St. Augustine, Florida, was the captain's decision to navigate through an area known to have shoals instead of the marked entrance channel.


The incident occurred on June 19, 2024, when the 55-foot (16.8-metre) vessel grounded on shoals at the north side of the St. Augustine Inlet.
After the grounding, the captain manoeuvred into deeper water where the vessel began taking on water and partially sank.
The captain and one passenger abandoned the vessel and were rescued by local first responders; there were no injuries.
Damage to the vessel was estimated at $1 million.

According to the NTSB's report, the navigation chart for the area contained a cautionary note warning of frequent changes in depth due to shifting shoals.
 

 Visualizations of the area (NOAA raster & vector ENC) with the GeoGarage platform
 
The captain stated he had been through the inlet "many times" previously but was unaware of any local navigational warnings and could not recall seeing any navigational aids.

The NTSB found the captain did not navigate toward the lighted whistle buoy to follow the buoyed channel, instead proceeding directly through the shoal water at about 15 knots.

 
After the grounding, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission issued a civil penalty to the captain for, "reckless or careless operation of a vessel".
 
Links :