Saturday, May 10, 2025

Ocean with David Attenborough review – a passionate case against the ruination of the sea

 Ocean with David Attenborough takes viewers on a breathtaking journey showing there is nowhere more vital for our survival, more full of life, wonder, or surprise, than the ocean.
The celebrated broadcaster and filmmaker reveals how his lifetime has coincided with the great age of ocean discovery.
Through spectacular sequences featuring coral reefs, kelp forests and the open ocean, Attenborough shares why a healthy ocean keeps the entire planet stable and flourishing.
Stunning, immersive cinematography showcases the wonder of life under the seas and exposes the realities and challenges facing our ocean as never-before-seen, from destructive fishing techniques to mass coral reef bleaching.
Yet the story is one of optimism, with Attenborough pointing to inspirational stories from around the world to deliver his greatest message: the ocean can recover to a glory beyond anything anyone alive has ever seen.
 
From The Guardian by Peter Bradshaw

Released on his 99th birthday and presented in the context of his remarkable career, Sir David’s authority is matched only by nature’s grandeur in this visually stunning film


A visual marvel like all his work, governed by his own matchless authority and striking a steady tonal balance between warning and hope, David Attenborough’s new film about the oceans is absorbing and compelling.
He makes a passionate case against the ruin caused by industrial overfishing and the sinister mega-trawlers which roam everywhere, raking the seabed with their vast metal nets, brutally and wastefully hoovering up fish populations of which the majority is often simply thrown away, depleting developing countries and fishing communities of their share.
Attenborough says that this is the new colonialism.
The film is released in cinemas in anticipation of the UN’s World Oceans Day in June, which is campaigning for 30% of the world’s oceans to be preserved from exploitation – at present, only around 3% is protected in this way.


As he arrives at his 99th birthday, Sir David presents this new documentary in the context of his own remarkable life and career, studying and thinking about the oceans as the last part of the world to be fully understood and also, perhaps, the last part to be exploited – and despoiled.
As he says, until relatively recently, the ocean was regarded as a kind of mysterious, undifferentiated Sahara, a wilderness, of interest largely for providing an apparently endless supply of food.
But he shows us an amazing vista of diversity and life, an extraordinary undulating landscape, a giant second planet of whose existence humanity has long been unaware but now seems in danger of damaging or even destroying.

Attenborough shows us that glorious places of colour and light and life can be scoured and scorched into a nuclear winter of nothingness by overfishing, but that by preserving places from this kind of industrialisation, creating “no take zones”, we can give the ocean and its lifeforms time to recover.
This is often possible within quite a short space of time and the revived species can “spill over” into other zones; effectively, it is this preservation model that is being suggested.

But Attenborough is always emphasising that this is not a cause for complacency, for saying that overfishing doesn’t matter because the overfished areas can always be nursed back to life: because we never know how close we have come to the point of no return.
Attenborough matches the natural world’s grandeur with his own intellectual and moral seriousness.

Links :

Friday, May 9, 2025

What do we owe the octopus?

How many hearts does an octopus have?
How do species like the mimic octopus camouflage themselves?
Find out about these and other octopus facts.

From Wired by Emily Mullin 
 
Mounting research suggests that cephalopods experience pain.
Now, the National Institutes of Health is considering new animal welfare rules that would put them in the same category as monkeys.


Consider the octopus.
Smart and sophisticated, it has a brain larger than that of any other invertebrate.
With 500 million or so neurons, its nervous system is more typical of animals with a backbone.
In lab experiments, the octopus can solve mazes, open jars, and complete tricky tasks to get food rewards.
In the wild, they’ve been observed using tools—a benchmark of higher cognition.

Researchers have long been awed by their ability to camouflage, regenerate lost limbs, and release ink as a defense mechanism.
They have been used for studies on how psychedelics affect brains, and they may even dream.
Importantly, research shows that they also seem to experience pain.
Almost all animals have a reflex for responding to noxious stimuli, called nociception, but not all are aware that the sensation is bad or unpleasant—an awareness scientists now think octopuses and other cephalopods have.
Some scientists say this is proof of sentience, the capacity to experience feelings and sensations.

The state of cephalopod science has prompted the United States National Institutes of Health to consider whether these animals—which also include squid, cuttlefish, and nautiluses—deserve the same research protections as vertebrates.
“A growing body of evidence demonstrates that cephalopods possess many of the requisite biological mechanisms for the perception of pain,” the NIH wrote on its website.
The agency is soliciting feedback from scientists and the public online through the end of December.

Currently, invertebrate animals are not regulated under the Animal Welfare Act in the US, nor are they included in national standards for laboratory animals in federally funded studies.
Under these rules, scientists must seek approval from their institutions’ ethics boards for experiments involving animals such as mice and monkeys.
These boards ensure that proposed experiments comply with federal laws and minimize pain and distress to the animals.
The research must also produce benefits for human or animal health or otherwise advance knowledge.

Scientists often use rats, mice, monkeys, worms, and zebrafish as models to mimic aspects of human diseases and study biological processes.
But there’s growing interest in studying cephalopods to investigate movement, behavior, learning, and nervous system development, which means more researchers than ever are doing experiments on cephalopods.


 Photograph: Imagen Rafael Cosme Daza/Getty Images
 
Robyn Crook, a leading cephalopod researcher and an assistant professor of biology at San Francisco State University, says studying cephalopods may provide important insight into how the brain works.
“If we want to understand fundamental organizing principles of nervous systems, we need to look beyond brains that are all of the same evolutionary kind, and cephalopods are the only independently evolved, really complex brain,” she says.

Crook authored a study in 2021 showing that octopuses experience the emotional component of pain—like mammals do—rather than simply having a reflexive reaction to it.
Her experiment involved putting octopuses in a three-chambered box with different patterned walls.
After letting the animals swim freely between the chambers, Crook injected them with a stinging substance called acetic acid and noticed that the octopuses avoided the chamber in which they received the shot.
A control group injected with saline showed no such effect.

She then gave a painkiller to the octopuses that received the stinging shot and observed that they tended to prefer the chamber in which they got the pain relief.
The saline group, meanwhile, didn’t show a preference.
The results, she concluded, are evidence that octopuses experience a negative emotional state when exposed to pain.

The move toward treating cephalopods used in research more humanely started in 1991, when Canada became the first country to adopt protections for them.
In 2010, the European Union passed a directive to extend protections already in use for vertebrate lab animals to include cephalopods.
Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Norway have also adopted regulations.
Last year, after an independent report concluded that cephalopods and crustaceans have the capacity to feel pain and distress, the United Kingdom passed an amendment recognizing them as sentient beings.

In the US, a group of petitioners led by Harvard University’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic sent a letter to the NIH in 2020 asking the agency to amend the definition of “animal” in its policy on laboratory animal welfare to include cephalopods.
The letter made its way to Congress, and last October, 19 lawmakers requested that the US Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the NIH, adopt humane care handling standards for them.
“In recent years, there has been a wealth of research demonstrating that cephalopods are sensitive, intelligent creatures who, like other animals used in biomedical research, deserve to be treated humanely,” they wrote.

Jennifer Mather, a professor of psychology at the University of Lethbridge in Canada, also welcomes this action.
Mather, who has been studying octopuses for 40 years, was a signatory on the 2020 Harvard letter.
“As we expand the populations of species that we use for research, we have to also expand our thinking of what matters to them, and how we can take care of them,” she says.


To that end, she says researchers need to think about how to raise and house cephalopods.
These animals require shelter or dens, and they need regular enrichment so that they can express their normal behavior.
And she notes that because many octopuses and squid are cannibalistic, they should be kept in separate tanks.

Another consideration is the water quality of their tanks, says Clifton Ragsdale, a professor of neurobiology at the University of Chicago who studies octopuses.
Poor water quality can make the animals stressed or even kill them.
He thinks the NIH’s proposal is very reasonable and welcomes new rules.
“I’m hopeful that these regulations won’t be onerous and will improve the quality and kind of research that’s done,” he says.

Frans de Waal, a biologist and primatologist at Emory University, says new regulations could help reduce invasive experiments on cephalopods, such as ones that involve detaching their arms.
“I think there are going to be questions about: Is this really necessary?” says de Waal, who also directs the Living Links Center, which studies ethical and policy issues related to animal sentience.
“I would love for scientists to start thinking in alternative ways.”

De Waal thinks research guidelines should also extend to other invertebrates, such as crustaceans.
He points to a 2013 study in which researchers from the University of Belfast showed that crabs in tanks learned to avoid electric shocks and sought out areas in the tank where they could escape them.
The authors argued that this was evidence the crabs experience some form of pain, rather than just a reflex.

“Basically, every animal that has a brain—I’m going to assume that they are sentient for the moment because the evidence is going in that direction,” De Waal says.
It’s thought that animals without brains, such as starfish, jellyfish, and sea cucumbers, do not feel pain in the same way humans do.

Crook is in favor of regulations for cephalopod research, but she says it’s not as simple as including them in current policies that apply to vertebrates.
“Because these are a fundamentally different evolutionary branch of animals, it’s really hard to know whether a drug that you would give to enhance welfare in a vertebrate animal is at all effective in a cephalopod,” she says.

For example, the opioid buprenorphine is often given to lab rodents and monkeys as a painkiller.
Its effects on cephalopods, however, is unknown.
“How do you look at a cephalopod and say, ‘That one’s in pain and that one’s not?’” Crook asks.
“There’s no point regulating if we have no idea whether or not we’re actually enhancing the welfare of the animal.” She thinks more research is needed on anesthetics and pain relievers to learn how to best carry out experiments that may cause pain to these animals.

For now, the NIH is only considering changes, and the agency hasn’t yet set a date on when those revisions would be implemented.
As scientists learn more about how invertebrates experience pain, research protections may one day extend to much more of the animal kingdom.
 
Links :

Thursday, May 8, 2025

Building Panama Canal: demolition,disease and death

Discover what it took to build the Panama Canal, and how this colossal construction project changed the region.
In the 19th century, the California gold rush brought thousands of settlers to America's west coast.
But finding gold may have been easier than transporting it back east.
The only hope for avoiding a grueling six month wagon journey was to travel the narrowest portion of the continent — the 48-kilometer Isthmus of Panama.
Alex Gendler details the creation of the Panama Canal
 
Links :

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

USCG’s plan to remove hundreds of buoys is meeting opposition

 
The Coast Guard has proposed removing hundreds of buoys and navigational markers from the Northeast.
Professional mariners and recreational boaters are not happy about the proposal.
(U.S.
Coast Guard Photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Amber Howie)


 From Soundingsonline by Pim Van Hemmen
 
Professional mariners and recreational boaters are unhappy about the Coast Guard's proposed cost-saving measure.
 
On April 15, a Coast Guard Local Notice for District 1 advised mariners that the service proposes to remove hundreds of navigational markers in Northeastern coastal waters.
According to the Coast Guard the buoys, day beacons, and lights are outdated technology, but boaters are not happy about it.
The proposal has already drawn the ire of mariners up and down the New England coast, including Maine, where over 150 buoys are to be removed or altered and where navigation is particularly tricky due to fog and the coast’s rocky nature.
Buoys marked for elimination include ones that mark rocky ledges and underwater hazards.
In Penobscot Bay alone, just south of Vinalhaven, the service proposes the elimination of nine ledge markers, most of which lurk just beneath the surface.

But it’s not just Mainers who are upset.
On the Sailing Anarchy forum one member wrote, “It’s an absolute hatchet job. For example, axing 11 buoys in Woods Hole. Anyone who’s been through Woods Hole knows how tricky it can be, and it really doesn’t feel like they can afford to get rid of any buoys there. I’ve personally seen more than one sinking due to pilot confusion and this will just make it worse.”

Local Notices To Mariners of April 15 (LNM District 1; Week 16) 
 
According to the USCG, the effort is to modernize and rightsize the buoy constellation, “whose designs mostly predate Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Electronic Navigation Charts (ENC), and Electronic Charting Systems (ECS), for long-term reliability and serviceability.”

The USCG thinks the reduced number of buoys is justifiable since most mariners today rely on chartplotters, electronic charts and smartphone apps rather than taking multiple fixes on landmarks and navigational aids, but many boaters don’t agree.
“This feels different than an approach buoy here and there being obsoleted by GPS,” a commenter on the Sailing Anarchy website wrote.
“Many of the proposed removals mark rocks or shoals where straying a few feet from the channel could be highly consequential.”

A beached buoy is pulled off Wells Beach by the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Marcus Hanna on April 22, 2024.
Carl D. Walsh/Portland Press Herald
 
A lot of mariners believe it could impact safety because skippers rely on visually locating nuns and cans to confirm their location.
Lobsterman Gregory Turner told Maine’s WGME Channel 13 that in a snowstorm or thick fog he relies on Coast Guard buoys to confirm what his navigation system is showing him.
“When you become disoriented in the fog, and you go alongside a buoy to see what that number is, if there’s no buoy there, how are you going to figure it out?” Turner said.
“You’re not supposed to rely on only one kind of navigation. I have paper charts from years ago.”

The Coast Guard says the removals are intended to modernize navigation aids and to deliver effective, economical service.
“The message we got from the Coast Guard was that it was to help with budgets,” Portland Deputy Harbormaster Hattie Train told WGME.

A Sailing Anarchy commenter said the buoys are needed in particular if the GPS system went down or if the electronics failed, adding that cost savings were not a good enough reason to eliminate the buoys.
“Redundancy is a good thing in our particular endeavor,” the commenter wrote.
“Tax me if you have to, but leave the [expletive] buoys in place.”

The Coast Guard will be accepting comments on the proposal until June 13.
The USCG will not be accepting phone calls, so all comments must be made in writing.
Refer to Project No. 01-25-015.
E-mail can be sent to: D01-SMB-DPWPublicComments@uscg.mil.

Links :

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Mediterranean Sea becomes world’s 5th sulphur emission control zone

Reducing sulphur emissions for ships
 
From MarineInsight

From May 1, 2025, the Mediterranean Sea has officially been designated as an Emission Control Area (ECA) for Sulphur Oxides and Particulate Matter (PM), under MARPOL Annex VI.

This means that ships sailing in the region must now use fuel oil with a sulphur content no higher than 0.10%, which is five times lower than the 0.50% allowed outside these zones.

The decision was made by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) during the 79th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 79) back in December 2022.

This step aims to reduce air pollution from ships and improve public health and marine safety in the Mediterranean region.

The IMO regulation is expected to bring significant benefits.
It is estimated that sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions from ships will drop by 78.7%, which translates to a yearly reduction of around 8.5 million tonnes of SOx released into the air.
Additionally, emissions of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) are expected to go down by 23.7%.

The Mediterranean region, which handles about 20% of global seaborne trade and is home to 24% of the world’s ship fleet, is one of the busiest maritime zones in the world.
With over 17% of worldwide cruise traffic passing through its waters, the new rules are expected to bring major health and environmental benefits.

According to studies from the UN Environment Programme’s Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP/MAP), these changes could help prevent approximately 1,100 premature deaths and over 2,300 new cases of childhood asthma each year.

Visibility across regions like North Africa and the Strait of Gibraltar is also expected to improve, lowering the risk of maritime accidents.

The cleaner air will also reduce the risk of acidification, which harms crops, forests, aquatic species, and coastal ecosystems.

Health experts say that lowering sulphur emissions from shipping reduces the chances of lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, strokes, and asthma, especially in port cities.

This move has been made possible through a collaborative effort by all 21 countries surrounding the Mediterranean and the European Union.

The entire process was coordinated under the Barcelona Convention, with UNEP/MAP serving as the main platform for negotiations.

Technical support came from the Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC) and the Plan Bleu Regional Activity Centre.


This makes the Mediterranean Sea the fifth official Sulphur Emission Control Area in the world, following:
  • The Baltic Sea area
  • The North Sea area
  • The North American area (covering coastal waters off the U.S. and Canada)
  • The United States Caribbean Sea ECA (around Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands)
In 2024, the IMO further designated two more ECAs – the Canadian Arctic and the Norwegian Sea.
Later in April 2025, the MEPC 83 session approved a proposal to designate the North-East Atlantic as an ECA as well.

French officials said the fuel now required under the new regulation is five times less polluting than what was previously allowed.

According to the French maritime authority for the Mediterranean (DIRM), many ship operators had already begun using cleaner fuels in anticipation of the law.

Fanny Pointet, who leads sustainable shipping at the NGO Transport & Environment, stated that Europe already has tough port regulations.

However, she added that “the strength of this new measure is that it will apply across the whole of the Mediterranean Sea, so not only in European ports, but also in North African ports.”

The success of previous ECA zones has shown positive outcomes. Since 2014, sulphur emissions in Northern Europe have dropped by 70% due to similar rules.

However, the European Commission and Mediterranean coastal countries are now considering the next step: establishing a Nitrogen Oxide Emission Control Area (NECA) to tackle nitrogen-based pollution from ships, which has increased by 10% between 2015 and 2023.

Back in January 2020, a separate IMO rule had already reduced the sulphur limit outside ECAs to 0.5%, leading to a 70% drop in global sulphur oxide emissions from shipping.

Links :

Monday, May 5, 2025

Charting the course: Navigation throughout history


Astrolabe, an ancient navigation instrument that combined celestial maps, terrestrial maps and measuring devices.
A Muslim device from the 11th century
(Photo: WH_Pics, Shutterstock)


From YnetNews by Ettay Nevo/Davidson Institute of Science Education

From ancient Polynesian seafarers to nuclear submarines, from traders in camel caravans to astronauts - everyone must successfully navigate from one place to another

When the Israelites left Egypt on their way to the land of Canaan, divine providence, according to the biblical account, provided for their every need.

Food from the heavens, water from the rocks, medical services, a social and communal framework, and no less important—a navigation system: a pillar of fire to lead them by night and a pillar of cloud by day.
While the story of the Exodus likely did not unfold as described in the biblical sources, it holds an enduring place in cultural memory as a powerful mythological journey.

But what would the Israelites have done without the pillar of cloud and the pillar of fire? How would they have found their way to Canaan—a land they had never seen? Throughout history, individuals and entire populations have migrated and traveled vast distances, sometimes along familiar routes and other times into completely unfamiliar territory.

To deal with these challenges humanity gradually developed the discipline of navigation, the body of knowledge that allows us to orient ourselves, understand our surroundings, and find our way to new destinations, even in unfamiliar terrain.

We're on the map

With all due respect to the Israelites, navigating on land is relatively straightforward.
The terrain offers countless landmarks: towering mountains, winding rivers, distinct land formations, recognizable structures, and even regional vegetation and wildlife typical to specific regions.
To find your way, all you need is a map that marks the location of these landmarks —whether through detailed illustrations or agreed-upon symbols.

And indeed, already at early stages of human civilization, people began mapping their surroundings.
Exactly how early this began is still debated.
Many researchers point to a mural uncovered at the Çatalhöyük site in Turkey to be the oldest known map.

The mural, likely from the 7th millennium B.C.,is thought to be a diagram of village houses though not everyone agrees that it qualifies as a true map.
Similar debates exist over even older artifacts, such as 10,000- and even 20,000-year-old mammoth tusks with etched patterns that may be a symbolic representation of the geographic environment, a 16,000-year-old rock from Spain that appears to show hunting grounds, and other ancient finds.
Some of the ancient maps we are familiar with were used for navigation alone: maps from Babylon and ancient Egypt, for example, were used to delineate borders between farmers' plots and to calculate their size for taxation purposes.
Still, when it comes to orientation and movement through unfamiliar terrain, a map remains an essential tool.

For example, if we wanted to walk from Athens to Sparta, we’d start by heading northwest out of Athens.
After about 25 kilometers, we’d reach Eleusis, where we’d turn west-southwest and continue another 50 kilometers along the coast to Isthmia.
From there, we’d go roughly 100 kilometers southwest to Tripoli, and then another 50 kilometers south to reach the gates of Sparta.
Without a map, such planning—and the journey itself—would be extremely difficult.
But even with a map, navigation requires more.
We must know our current position, the direction we're heading, and the distance traveled—or at least our walking speed to estimate it.
Without such information, we risk losing our way unless we rely on marked roads, signs, or the kindness of shepherds.
In modern Greece, we might be fortunate enough to find all of these.
But in ancient times and distant lands, such help was far from guaranteed.


A computer scan of a Babylonian stone plate from the 7th century B.C., engraved with a map of mesopotamia
(Photo: SHEILA TERRY / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY)
 
The most obvious natural landmark available to us is the sun.
Even in the earliest days of human history, people observed that the sun rises each morning from roughly the same direction—what we now call east—and sets in the opposite direction, west.
However, determining direction during the hours between sunrise and sunset is more complicated.


Throughout the day, the sun appears to move across the sky—not in a straight line, but along a curved path.
In the northern hemisphere, this path leans toward the south; in the southern hemisphere, it leans northward.
The exact trajectory of the sun depends on both the observer’s location on Earth and the time of year.
To accurately use the sun for navigation, it’s important to know roughly where you are, what season it is, and, ideally, the time of day.
At night, you can locate north with relative ease using the North Star, which appears to us to be located almost directly above Earth’s North Pole - assuming clear skies and, naturally, and as long as we are located in the northern hemisphere.

You can also use other stars or prominent constellations to navigate, but their positions shift throughout the night and change with the seasons as well as with the observer’s location.
Here too, knowing your approximate position and the time is crucial for accurate orientation.
It’s no wonder therefore that throughout history the fields of cartography and navigation have been closely tied to the development of timekeeping technologies.


Diagram showing the location of the Polaris (the North Star) relative to the constellations Ursa Major and Ursa Minor
(Photo: Mykola Mazuryk, Shutterstock)

Navigating the waves

As mentioned earlier, land navigation benefits from terrain features, visible landmarks, roads, trails and signs.
At sea, however, such aids vanish.
When surrounded by nothing but water from horizon to horizon, maintaining direction becomes a formidable challenge—especially when the weather is unfriendly.

Nevertheless, sea travel could often be faster and more efficient than land travel, particularly across mountainous regions or when transporting large quantities of goods.
And, of course, for island dwellers, maritime navigation had no alternatives and was essential for trade—or for waging war—with other islands or with distant continents.
Ancient Greek societies, such as the Minoans and Mycenaeans, were among the first to develop shipbuilding along with navigational techniques.
Much of their early navigation was coastal: ships sailed within sight of land, and sailors with sharp eyesight learned to recognize prominent coastal features to orient themselves.
Over time, methods of navigation by the sun and stars also gradually emerged.
It’s no coincidence that the word "navigation" in English—and its equivalents in many other languages—derives from the ancient Proto-Indo-European word nauta, meaning ship or boat.
Originally, the term referred not just to the act of navigation but to the act of sailing itself—and it is still sometimes used that way in modern English.
In another part of the world, Polynesian navigators in the Pacific Ocean developed astonishingly sophisticated methods for crossing vast expanses of open water between islands and archipelagos.
Centuries before the Common Era, Polynesians passed down from generation to generation extensive knowledge regarding the characteristics of the sea in different regions, based on features such as winds, wave patterns, and currents with extraordinary skill.

This knowledge was often represented in unique navigational maps, known as stick charts, crafted from thin and flexible sticks, and marked with shells or coral fragments to represent islands.
These maps, combined with the extraordinary skills of the navigators, enabled Polynesians to travel between islands separated by hundreds—or even thousands—of kilometers.

Polynesians, Greeks, and many other seafaring cultures also learned to use animals as navigational aids.
Observing the behavior of certain fish or seabirds helped indicate proximity to land.
Some sailors even carried birds aboard: when released at sea, a bird that circled and returned signaled open water, meaning they could sail on, while a bird that flew in a straight line likely indicated nearby land, and following it was likely to lead to a place to land.
This method likely influenced the biblical account of Noah’s Ark and the release of the dove.


Stick chart from the indigenous peoples of the Marshall Islands
(Photo: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, GEOGRAPHY AND MAP DIVISION / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY)

Crossing the lines

The Greek astronomer Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemaeus), who lived and worked in Alexandria in the second century CE, is often regarded as one of the greatest astronomers of antiquity—though he shares that title with several others.
Like many scholars of his time, Ptolemy did not limit himself to a single discipline, and perhaps it is fortunate that he didn’t.

His astronomical work included the detailed and systematic mapping of constellations, alongside an inaccurate model of the solar system in which the sun and planets revolved around the Earth, as well as studies in astrology.
At the same time, Ptolemy produced one of the most remarkable geographical works of antiquity, compiling a book that contained numerous maps, including a map of the entire known world.
By Ptolemy’s era, scholars already understood that the Earth was spherical.
One of Ptolemy’s key contributions was the introduction of a global coordinate grid, dividing the sphere into lines of latitude—parallel to one another—and lines of longitude, which converge at the poles.
In fact, this innovation likely originated with Hipparchus, an astronomer who lived about three centuries earlier—and who (surprise!) is also often hailed as the greatest astronomer of antiquity.
However, it was Ptolemy who fully applied the system and incorporated grid-marked maps into his major work, Geography (or Geographia).

Although the original manuscript was lost, parts of it were reconstructed from surviving copies, along with a map depicting the known world at the time.
One of Ptolemy’s notable errors was his underestimation of Earth's size.
Nevertheless, two key principles from his maps have endured: the recognition that maps must be adjusted when projecting a spherical surface onto a flat plane, and the use of latitude and longitude lines to describe locations with precision.


An early global worldview, featuring the use of latitude and longitude grids.
Reconstruction of Ptolemy’s world map
(Photo: Morphart Creation, Shutterstock)
 
Using such a grid, the location of any point on Earth can be described with two numbers: the distance north or south from the equator (latitude) and the distance east or west from a reference line of longitude, defined as zero.

The greater the precision of these numbers, the smaller and more specific the area they define.
For example, at the intersection of latitude 37 degrees, 59 minutes, and 3 seconds north (37°59′03″N) and longitude 23 degrees, 43 minutes, and 41 seconds east (23°43′41″E) lies the city of Athens, the capital of Greece.
Alongside the concept of latitude lines, navigational tools were developed that allowed sailors to calculate their position using celestial bodies.
The simplest of these was an adjustable protractor, which could be aimed at a specific celestial object to measure its position relative to the horizon.

For instance, if the angle to the North Star measured 30°, it indicated a position 30 degrees north of the equator—at latitude 30°N.
Sailors could then travel north or south to reach the desired latitude, and from there, sail east or west toward their destination.
Before long, the basic protractor quickly gave way to the Astrolabe (Greek for “star-taker”), an instrument combining an angle measurement tool with maps of the Earth and markings for lines of latitude.
Some astrolabes also featured celestial maps, engraved on wooden or metal disks that rotated relative to each other, allowing the user to observe and calculate their position based on several known constellations.
The basic astrolabe was likely invented in the 2nd century BCE—some even attribute its invention to Hipparchus—and it greatly improved navigation ability, both on land and at sea, provided that conditions allowed for accurate measurements.
More advanced models even allowed users to estimate the time of day based on the positions of celestial objects.
Using such devices at known locations also helped astronomers chart the skies more precisely, advancing both navigation and the science of astronomy.


A grid system enabling the definition of any point on Earth through numerical coordinates .
Longitude (right) and latitude lines
(Photo: Anshuman Rath, Shutterstock)

Finding north

More than 2,500 years ago, people in ancient Greece, China, and likely other parts of the world were aware of the existence of magnetic stones that could attract iron.
Such stones were used in rituals, games, fortune-telling, and other practices.
The word "magnetic" likely derives from the Greek city of Magnesia, in present-day Turkey, where many such stones were found.
It would take more than a thousand additional years before the Chinese discovered that these stones could be used for navigation.
They observed that a thin, lightweight piece of iron, magnetized by rubbing it against a magnetic stone and light enough to float on the surface of water, would rotate and align itself toward magnetic north.
Over time, these devices were gradually refined into the compasses we know today, reaching Europe by the 12th century.
Small improvements were introduced, such as scale markings that allowed for more accurate determination of angles towards specific objects or directions of travel, and mechanisms that stabilized the needle, allowing it to rotate with greater precision.

Yet the basic principle remained unchanged: the compass points toward Earth's magnetic north, enabling navigators on land or at sea to quickly and easily determine the different directions.
Of course, the magnetic compass is not free from inaccuracies.
Earth's magnetic pole is not exactly aligned with its geographic pole, and compasses become less reliable near the poles.
Local magnetic fields, whether natural (from magnetic rocks) or artificial (from the iron hulls of ships or electronic systems), can also interfere with readings.

Still, in most situations, the magnetic compass proved incredibly reliable and revolutionized navigation.
It allowed travel in any weather, at any time.
Once a navigator knew their position on a map, all that remained was to set the ship’s course using the compass—and sail toward the destination.


Though not without inaccuracies, the simple compass revolutionized navigation
(Photo: Paya Mona, Shutterstock)

Navigating with your eyes closed

The invention of the compass paved the way for a navigation technique known as dead reckoning, also referred to as approximate navigation or computed navigation.
Imagine needing to sail to a point 2,000 kilometers to the southwest.
By setting your ship’s heading in that direction and knowing, for example, that you are traveling at a speed of 20 kilometers per hour, you could, in theory, reach your destination after 100 hours of steady sailing.

However, this method carries significant risks, especially if your equipment is unreliable or if winds and currents subtly push you off course.
It also depends heavily on accurately knowing your speed—something that seems simple today but was anything but easy in ancient times.
Early sailors could only estimate their speed based on the strength of the wind, the feel of ocean currents, or by timing the duration of travel between known landmarks.
Measuring time at sea presented its own challenges, often relying on celestial observations or basic instruments to track short time intervals.
One common method for estimating speed involved tossing a weighted rod tied to a coiled rope into the water.
Knots were tied at regular intervals along the rope.
As the ship moved, a sailor would let the rope play out and use an hourglass to measure a fixed short interval—say, half a minute—counting how many knots passed through his hands.

The faster the ship, the more knots would pass in the set time.
Thus, the "knot" became a unit of speed.
It would take centuries before a standardized definition was established, long after the days of ropes, knots, and hourglasses had faded.
Today, one knot is defined as one nautical mile—1,852 meters—per hour.
The term is still widely used in shipping, aviation, and meteorology.
When the skipper reports a 20-knot wind, he is referring to a wind speed of about 37 kilometers per hour.
The ability to estimate speed at sea greatly enhanced navigation, even without relying solely on dead reckoning.
It enabled sailors to better estimate distances and cartographers to produce more accurate maps.
It also illustrated the tight link between navigation and timekeeping.


A British pilot’s navigation kit from World War II, featuring a magnetic compass and a watch
(Photo: J.S.Bond, Wikipedia)
 
Refining accuracy

Over time, increasingly accurate maps were supplemented by detailed data tables.
These tables were the result of the meticulous work of astronomers who recorded and calculated the positions of celestial objects at different locations around the world.

For example, by measuring the angle between the sun and the horizon at noon, one could determine latitude with great precision—provided the date was known (or conversely, determine the date if the location was known)—using tables that listed these angles for every place and time.
Other stars could also be used similarly for navigation.
One astronomer who contributed important tables at a crucial historical moment was Abraham Zacuto, who worked in Spain and Portugal during the late 15th and early 16th centuries.
His works were published during the great age of exploration and played a vital role in assisting sailors like Christopher Columbus, Vasco da Gama, and others in their voyages to discover America, circumnavigate Africa, and reach new lands.
From the 18th century onward, such tables were regularly compiled into almanacs, which became essential navigation aids.
An almanac is a type of annual data book, and navigational almanacs contained tables listing the precise positions of dozens of stars and planets for every day and hour of the year.

In 1767, Britain’s Royal Observatory at Greenwich began publishing its Nautical Almanac annually.
While other institutions would later publish their own almanacs, Greenwich soon became the global reference point for navigation.
At the same time, the accuracy of celestial measurements improved dramatically with the invention of a new device - the Sextant.
Similar in purpose to the astrolabe, the sextant measured the angle between celestial bodies, but it did so with far greater precision, aided by optical lenses.
These advancements greatly enhanced maritime navigation, yet one major challenge in determining human position on Earth still remained.


Sextant placed on a map
(Photo: Triff, Shutterstock)

The longitude lines

In October 1707, a fleet of 21 British Royal Navy ships was making its way home from the war against Spain.
Several days of severe weather made it extremely difficult for the navigators to determine the ships’ positions, and on October 22, many of them ran aground on the rocks of the Isles of Scilly, southwest of Cornwall, England.

Without the ability to perform accurate position measurements after days of stormy sailing, the navigators had to rely on rough estimates of the distance traveled.
They believed they were about 300 kilometers farther southwest than their actual location, safely away from dangerous reefs.

This miscalculation led to one of the worst naval disasters in British history: four ships sank, several others were severely damaged, and at least 1,400 sailors lost their lives.
Although the disaster resulted from a combination of errors and misjudgments, the British Parliament chose to focus on one critical issue, offering a large reward to anyone who could solve the pressing navigational challenge of accurately determining a ship’s longitude.
As mentioned earlier, it is relatively easy to determine one’s position north or south of the equator by measuring the angles of stars at night and the sun at noon.
However, determining position along the east-west axis is much more challenging.
The obvious solution lies in timekeeping: if you knew the exact time at your current location and the exact time at a specific reference point with a known position, you could calculate your distance east or west based on the time difference.

Using observations of the sun, stars, and almanac tables, it was possible to determine local time aboard a ship, but knowing the exact time at the reference point was a much greater challenge.
In theory, a clock could be brought on board—but the mechanical clocks of the period were not accurate enough for long voyages, given the swaying and turbulence of sea travel.
Pendulum clocks, which performed reliably on land, failed at sea because they required stability to operate properly—something impossible aboard a moving ship.


Mid-18th-century engraving of the shipwreck at the Isles of Scilly, featuring the ship Association at the center
(Photo: Wikipedia)

Enter John Harrison, an English carpenter and watchmaker, who dedicated much of his life to solving this problem.
Harrison developed the marine chronometer—a clock capable of maintaining precise time despite the harsh conditions at sea.
His first models were large and heavy, but following over 13 years of relentless work, he completed his fourth version at the age of 68: a compact, portable chronometer that proved its accuracy during a transatlantic crossing.
Harrison’s invention effectively solved the longitude problem.

With such a clock on board, showing the time at a known reference point, navigators needed only to determine the local time at their current location, compare it to the clock, and calculate their distance from the reference point.
Accurate latitude measurements remained important as well, since the Earth's circumference varies with latitude.

Since Greenwich had already been established as the astronomical reference point, it also became fixed as the reference for longitude calculations, and the line running from pole to pole through Greenwich was designated as the Prime Meridian (longitude 0°).
For many years, "Greenwich Mean Time" (GMT) also served as the global standard for setting local clocks, and remains familiar today, although for scientific and technical purposes it has largely been replaced by Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
During the time when Harisson was developing the marine chronometer, another method for determining longitude was developed: lunar distance measurementsPDF file, This involved measuring the height of the moon in the sky at a specific time and comparing it to Greenwich’s data using almanacs.

When weather conditions permitted these observations, it was possible to calculate longitude with reasonably good accuracy.
However, the method required much longer and more complex calculations than simply using a clock.
Once the price of chronometers dropped to a more affordable level, determining longitude with their help quickly displaced earlier methods, once again highlighting the close relationship between navigation and timekeeping.


The fifth model of John Harrison’s marine chronometer, small enough to fit in a pocket
(Photo: Racklever, Wikipedia)

Looking from above

In 1886 German physicist Heinrich Hertz succeeded in transmitting a spark between two electrical wires that were not physically connected.
Next, he increased the distance between the wires to several meters and demonstrated that the invisible radiation traveling between them moved at the speed of light.

These experiments marked the first successful transmission of electromagnetic radiation.
Scientists who followed Hertz quickly recognized the potential of his discovery.
Within just two decades, radio waves were being transmitted across the Atlantic Ocean, connecting America and Europe—a distance of thousands of kilometers.
This young technology held immense promise not only for communication but also for navigation.
For example, a marine vessel could orient itself toward a radio signal it received from a distance, and navigate more easily—even in stormy weather, when location measurements using traditional methods were impossible.

Using relatively simple mathematics and the method of triangulation, it is possible to calculate the distance between a receiver or transmitter and two antennas at known locations, as well as the angle between the receiver and the antennas.
A more advanced method, trilateration, allowed for the determination of an exact position by measuring distances from three points—made even more precise by using additional points, a technique known as multilateration.
Radio not only revolutionized maritime navigation but also had a profound impact on the emerging field of aerial navigation at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Although humans had ascended into the skies as early as the 18th century, it was in balloons that could not truly be steered.
The advent of motorized flight brought new challenges and an urgent need for reliable navigation systems for airships and, later, airplanes.

In a relatively short time, advances in both aviation and electronics made it possible to equip every aircraft with a radio transmitter and receiver.
Radio signals greatly aided—and continue to aid—aircraft and other vehicles in navigating their routes.
However, radio navigation has its limitations: it depends on ground stations to transmit the necessary signals, and such stations are not always available.
Over enemy territory, signals might be disrupted or deliberately falsified, and there is always the risk of equipment malfunction.
For these reasons, despite its importance, pilots cannot rely solely on radio for navigation.


Array of antennas and beacons at Düsseldorf Airport, Germany
(Photo: Rene Hausotte, Shutterstock)

Inventing the wheel

The name of the French physicist Léon Foucault is best known today thanks to the pendulum named after him, which dramatically demonstrated the Earth's rotation.
Foucault performed his famous demonstration in 1851, but continued searching for methods to measure Earth's movement and its variations.

This pursuit led him to develop the gyroscope—a device consisting of a spinning disk mounted to rotate freely on its axis, with minimal friction.
As long as the disk spins, the conservation of angular momentum causes the gyroscope to resist changes to its axis of rotation, exerting a force perpendicular to the direction of any attempted change.

In Foucault’s time, however, there were no means to keep the disk spinning indefinitely.
Still, his successors quickly recognized the gyroscope’s immense potential, for example in stabilizing ships and, later, airplanes, and also for use as a compass.
If a gyroscope’s axis is aligned to point north, it will continue to point that way as long as the disk spins.

If a ship or aircraft veers off course, the gyroscope detects the deviation.
Unlike a magnetic compass, the gyroscope is unaffected by local magnetic fields, nearby devices, or proximity to the poles, and it does not require a perfectly level surface to function.
For example, when an aircraft makes a sharp turn and tilts, the magnetic compass becomes unreliable, while a gyroscope not only remains accurate—it can also indicate to the pilot the precise angle of the plane’s turn.


Gyroscope
(Photo: Tatiana Shepeleva, Shutterstock)

Developing efficient gyroscopes for aviation was a major challenge—but one that paid off.
Since a gyroscope can both indicate direction and help maintain it by stabilizing an aircraft, it became the foundation for the development of automatic flight control systems (AFCS).
American pilot Lawrence Sperry developed one of the first autopilot systems, building on knowledge from his father Elmer Sperry, one of the inventors of the gyroscopic compass.

In June 1914, during a flight safety innovation contest in France, Sperry demonstrated his stabilization system with a dramatic stunt.
During the first pass over the judges' stand, he raised both hands in the air to show he wasn’t piloting the plane—the aircraft maintained its course and stability on its own.
On a second pass, his flight mechanic Emil Cachin crawled out onto a wing, dramatically shifting the plane’s weight, while Sperry continued waving, demonstrating that the plane remained stable despite the drastic weight shifts.

Over time, gyroscopes became an integral part of every flight system, and instruments such as the artificial horizon, which displays an aircraft’s roll (side tilt) and pitch (nose up or down) to the pilot, are also based on them.
An important addition to gyroscopes was the accelerometer, which enables the measurement of changes in a device’s speed at any given moment.
With the stabilizing effect of gyroscopes, these systems can measure acceleration along each of an aircraft’s three axes of movement and provide critical information about changes in position.
A system based on gyroscopes and accelerometers can be used for accurate computational navigation.
If we provide the system with the precise coordinates of our starting location and our initial velocity, we can accurately and continually calculate changes in speed and direction, and thus our precise location, without relying on radio signals or any other external information.

Today, this method is known as Inertial Navigation.
It is critical not only for aircraft and ships but also for submarines, which may remain submerged for weeks without any contact with the outside world.
Inertial navigation is also employed by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and by weapons systems such as cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, allowing them to travel long distances and strike distant targets with high precision without depending on external data sources that could be disrupted by defense systems.
Over the years mechanical gyroscopes were replaced with gyroscopic systems that are based on measurements of the degree of change in the rotation of laser beams.
These laser-based gyroscopes offer high accuracy and, most importantly, are remarkably small.
Today, such gyroscopes, combined with accelerometers, are installed in virtually every smartphone.

They enable the device to rotate the display according to its orientation, stabilize the camera to produce sharp images even when the phone is unsteady.
They also enable accurate measurement of the movement, angle and speed of the phone, supporting the development of a wide range of applications.
For example, some apps can automatically alert emergency services if the device detects a sudden drop in speed, indicating that the user may have been involved in a car accident and is unable to call for help.


The inertial navigation system of the Apollo spacecraft
(Photo: ArnoldReinhold, Wikipedia)

Observing from higher above

On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched the first artificial satellite.
Sputnik became the first human-made object to orbit the Earth, carrying only a simple radio transmitter that broadcast a constant signal.
Scientists and radio enthusiasts around the world followed the satellite in space using these signals, but a few American scientists quickly realized it could work the other way around: if the satellite’s exact course was known, the timing and characteristics of its signal could be used to determine our own location.
Within a few years, the United States developed the Transit system, primarily intended to provide precise positioning for submarines armed with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.
Inertial navigation systems—especially those of the time, tended to accumulate small errors over time.

To improve the likelihood that a missile launched from a submerged submarine would accurately reach its target, it was essential to update the submarine’s launch coordinates as precisely as possible.
The Transit system, initially consisting of four satellites, was designed to allow a submarine to receive a signal within a relatively short time, update its position, launch its missile, and then quickly submerge again to avoid detection.
Later, the Transit system was replaced by newer systems featuring a larger number of satellites.
Over time, the United States opened its military positioning system—GPS, short for Global Positioning System—for civilian use, and today it is available to anyone, alongside several equivalent systems developed by other countries.
The positioning system relies on the fact that, at any given moment, every point on Earth is within direct line of sight of several satellites.
Each satellite continuously transmits a precise time signal toward Earth.
A receiver that picks up these signals can compare the time of transmission with the time of reception to calculate the distance the signal has traveled.

By cross-referencing signals from multiple satellites with known positions, the receiver can accurately determine its own location.
To achieve this, the time signals must be extremely precise and perfectly synchronized between the satellites and the receivers, which is why the satellites are equipped with atomic clocks capable of measuring time with exceptional accuracy.
It is yet another clear reminder of the enduring connection between navigation and timekeeping, even in the 21st century.
With the advancement of electronics, receivers have been miniaturized to the point where nearly every smartphone now contains a chip capable of determining its location with an accuracy of just a few meters—or even less.
By cross-referencing this information with mapping applications, our phones can tell us not just our geographic coordinates, but the exact street, building, or even the best route to our next destination—whether on foot, by private car, or via public transport, anywhere on Earth.


Today, nearly everyone carries a smartphone equipped with a chip that receives time signals from navigation satellites and determines location with meter-level accuracy.

(Photo: Bakhtiar Zein, Shutterstock)

Seeing stars

Thanks to modern technology and satellites, we can easily determine our location anywhere on Earth—even while flying high above it or orbiting it in a spacecraft.
But what happens when we venture farther away from Earth? How do we navigate in the vastness of deep space?
Navigation tools in space are, in principle, very similar to those used on Earth.
Every spacecraft is equipped with gyroscopes and accelerometers that measure its position and orientation along the three axes of motion.
Maintaining the correct orientation is especially critical when firing the engine to change course, as the engine must be pointed precisely in the intended direction.
Accurate orientation is also essential for tasks such as aiming antennas toward Earth, aligning solar panels towards the Sun, and more.



Astronaut Jim Lovell measuring star distances during the Apollo 8 navigation system operation
(Photo: NASA)

In space, dead reckoning (or computed navigation) can also be used—and often even more easily than on Earth.
Since a spacecraft’s speed remains nearly constant unless its engines are fired, if it is aimed correctly and given the appropriate velocity, it has a good chance of reaching its intended destination.
To ensure accuracy, spacecraft perform course corrections by checking their position in space.

But without GPS satellites, how is this possible? By using the stars.
Before a mission begins, a set of bright, easily identifiable stars is selected.
By measuring the precise angles to these stars, the spacecraft can calculate its position relative to them.
During the Apollo missions, astronauts carried out these measurements manually using a telescope.
Today, however, many spacecraft are equipped with star trackers—advanced computerized cameras that scan the sky, measure the angles to predetermined stars, and automatically compute the spacecraft’s position relative to its planned trajectory.
Thus, thousands of years after ancient nomads and sailors looked to the night skies to guide their journeys, humanity still navigates by starlight—only now with advanced technology, setting course for destinations our ancestors could scarcely imagine.

Links :

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Chasing the tide

Chasing the Tide oins adventurers Chrissy and Jay Kleberg on an unprecedented expedition along Texas’ 370 miles of barrier islands.
This 21-day trek explores one of the most biologically diverse coastlines in North America and efforts to balance economic growth and healthy wildlife populations.