Friday, March 6, 2026

Iraq submits updated maritime boundaries to United Nations; Kuwait lodges protest

The new maritime map includes areas claimed by Kuwait [Getty]

From NewArab by Dana Taib Menmy


Iraq has filed a new map showing its maritime borders and saying that this is in compliance with international law, but this has caused an incident with Kuwait


The Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Saturday announced that it had submitted updated geographic coordinates to the United Nations, thereby formally delineating Iraq’s maritime boundaries in accordance with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

This submission prompted an official protest from Kuwait, which contends that elements of Iraq’s filing infringe upon Kuwaiti maritime sovereignty.

In a statement, Iraq's foreign ministry said that the submission was delivered to the UN Secretary-General on 19 January and 9 February 2026. It contains specified geographic coordinates and an illustrative map, as mandated by Articles 16(2), 75(2), and 84(2) of the convention.

The ministry indicated that the submission defines Iraq’s straight baselines and those based on the lowest low-water line for measuring its territorial sea.

It further delineates the boundaries of Iraq’s territorial sea, contiguous zone, exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and continental shelf. The coordinates were prepared using the internationally recognised World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS-84).


The ministry stated that this filing supersedes previous submissions from December 7, 2021, and April 15, 2011. The update aims to align Iraq’s maritime data with international law and to enhance legal clarity regarding its maritime zones.

The coordinates and map are accessible on the official website of the UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, under the Office of Legal Affairs, for use by member states and stakeholders.

The Iraqi Foreign Ministry reiterated Iraq’s commitment to international law and its intention to regulate maritime rights within established legal frameworks, thereby promoting regional stability and cooperation.

Kuwait Summons Iraqi ChargĂ© d’Affaires

In response, the Kuwaiti Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated on Saturday that it had expressed concern about Iraq’s submission of maritime coordinates and the accompanying map to the United Nations.

Kuwait asserted that Iraq’s submission includes claims affecting Kuwaiti sovereignty over specific maritime areas and features, such as Fasht Al-Qaid and Fasht Al-Aij, which Kuwait maintains have never been subject to dispute concerning its full sovereignty.

 
The ministry indicated that the submission defines Iraq’s straight baselines and those based on the lowest low-water line for measuring its territorial sea.

The Kuwaiti Foreign Ministry summoned the Iraqi chargĂ© d’affaires and delivered an official protest rejecting what it described as Iraqi claims infringing upon Kuwait’s maritime sovereignty and associated features.

Kuwait urged Iraq to consider the historical relationship between the two countries and to act in accordance with international law, the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and existing bilateral agreements and memoranda of understanding.

This development occurs amid ongoing legal and political repercussions arising from Iraq’s maritime arrangements with Kuwait, particularly following the Supreme Federal Court's annulment of the Khor Abdullah maritime agreement in 2023.

The treaty, signed in 2012 and ratified by Iraq’s parliament in 2013 as Law 42, regulated navigation in the Khor Abdullah waterway. The court ruled it unconstitutional because the required two-thirds parliamentary majority for ratifying international agreements was absent.


The ruling initiated debate concerning Iraq’s constitutional obligations, international commitments, and maritime rights in the Gulf. It also raised concerns in Kuwait and further complicated bilateral maritime arrangements.

Some Iraqi lawmakers and legal experts argue that the annulment renders the treaty void and obliges the government to notify the United Nations and the International Maritime Organisation.

In contrast, other government officials maintain that the agreement remains valid until it is replaced or re-ratified through constitutional procedures.

In April, independent MP and former transport minister Amir Abdul Jabbar Ismael filed a complaint against Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani under Article 329 of the Iraqi Penal Code, which addresses abuse of power and obstruction of justice.

Ismael alleged that al-Sudani instructed ministries not to forward the court’s ruling to the UN and the International Maritime Organisation, as required by the annulled treaty.

Sheikh Latif Mustafa, a constitutional law expert and former Iraqi MP, stated last year to The New Arab that the treaty cannot be reinstated unless the court reverses its decision or parliament reapproves the agreement with the requisite majority, both of which he considers improbable.

Numerous experts and public figures have instead advocated for renewed negotiations with Kuwait under updated legal and maritime frameworks and the debate has highlighted Iraq’s broader maritime vulnerabilities, as a nearly-landlocked nation.

On July 17, 2025, Iraq and Kuwait held the tenth session of their Joint Technical and Legal Committee on maritime borders. Discussions focused on the area beyond UN marker 162, the final point established under United Nations Security Council Resolution 833 in 1993.

While Kuwait confirmed the meeting, Iraq has not issued a formal statement. Reports of the talks drew criticism from Iraqi lawmakers and former officials, who warned that negotiations beyond marker 162 could undermine Iraq’s sovereignty and affect access to key infrastructure such as the Grand Faw Port.

Thursday, March 5, 2026

At least 1,000 civilian ships in the Persian Gulf are experiencing navigation problems due to electronic warfare


Straight lines indicate interference with satellite navigation
Starboard Maritime Intelligence for The Insider
 
From The Insider 

Since Feb. 28, at least 1,000 civilian ships in the waters of the Persian Gulf have encountered navigation difficulties due to large-scale GPS disruptions.
The development, picked up from maritime monitoring data and sharp “jumps” in the routes depicted on electronic maps, was shared with The Insider by analysts from the Starboard Maritime Intelligence service.

The specialists said there are signs of the substitution of navigation signals, causing vessels to receive incorrect coordinates.
 
Source: EU Sentinel-2
 
In a number of cases, routes on automatic identification systems (AIS) are displayed as straight lines crossing open water — and even land — indicating interference with satellite navigation.

The disruptions are linked to the active use of electronic warfare (EW) systems by coastal states in the region — not necessarily only Iran, but possibly also the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
Jamming and signal distortion could potentially complicate military strikes carried out using satellite-guided weapons.

Over the past 24 hours, at least two ships in the region have been attacked:
  • SKYLIGHT (IMO 9330020), a tanker flying the flag of Palau, was attacked 5 nautical miles north of Khasab, Oman. The crew was evacuated. Four people were reported injured.
Sanctioned tanker SKYLIGHT (IMO 9330020) has reportedly been struck off the coast of Oman near Duqm Port amid military activity linked to Operation Epic Fury.
Windward Remote Sensing Intelligence captured a SAR image of the vessel earlier today (Sunday, 02:05 UTC), confirming its position in the area prior to the reported strike.

  • MKD VYOM (IMO 9284386), a tanker flying the flag of the Marshall Islands, was hit by a projectile above the waterline. The resulting fire was brought under control.
There were also reports of a possible strike on the tanker SEA LA DONNA (IMO 9380532), but that information was not confirmed.
 

Iran says only Chinese ships can pass through the Strait of Hormuz, calling it a “gesture of thanks” for Beijing’s support.
All other vessels are banned, and Tehran warns any unauthorized crossing will be met with military action.

Threat level: critical

The incidents confirm the continuing threat of missile and drone attacks in the Strait of Hormuz and its approaches.
The Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) issued a report (made available to The Insider), assessing the situation in the waters of the Gulf of Oman as “critical,” raising the marker from “severe.” The report was prepared jointly with the UKMTO and MSCIO.

JMIC analysts note that increased vessel clustering is expected near UAE ports, along Omani approaches, and in anchorages of the Strait of Hormuz as operators delay transits pending further clarity.
Higher traffic density may create additional navigation risks, including restricted maneuvering space, anchor dragging, and the risk of collisions.

JMIC also points to significant interference with GNSS.
Positional offsets, AIS anomalies, and intermittent signal degradation have also been observed.

The JMIC forecasts that for the next 24-48 hours:
The threat of aerial missile and drone attacks will persist.
The risk of collateral damage remains high.
All merchant vessels, regardless of flag or nationality, are at risk.
No recognized authority has declared a formal closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The risk of mine deployment remains a key factor.
 
Links :

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Experience: I was adrift on a raft in the Atlantic for 76 days

 
76 Days Adrift—a profoundly immersive documentary that plunges you into the heart of one man's extraordinary survival story.
Steven Callahan, the author of the New York Times bestseller Adrift: 76 Days Lost at Sea, recounts the night of February 4, 1982, when a catastrophic collision with a whale left his boat sinking in the dead of night.
With the Atlantic Ocean surging into his vessel, Steven had only moments to grab what he could before launching himself into the dark, unforgiving sea in a life raft, clutching a basic emergency kit.
For an astonishing 76 days, that fragile inflatable raft became Steven's entire world as he drifted helplessly across the vast expanse of the Atlantic.
Forced to confront his deepest fears, limitations, and the raw power of nature, he discovered an inner strength he never knew he possessed.
Directed by Joe Wein and set to a haunting score by Fall Out Boy's Patrick Stump, 76 Days Adrift is more than just a survival story—it's a powerful meditation on human endurance, resilience, and the profound connection between man and nature.

From The Guardian by Steven Callahan

Ilove boats and I've spent all my life around them.
By my 20s I was designing and building them, one of which was a 6.5m sloop I named Napoleon Solo.
When I was 29, I sailed her alone across the Atlantic.
I'd been dreaming of doing it since I was 12, and the crossing was exhilarating.
On the return journey, the first week was calm, and when a gale started I wasn't too concerned: I knew the boat and I'd been through much worse.
Late that night, something – probably a whale or a large shark – smashed into the boat with a deafening bang, creating a hole in the hull.
I woke up in my bunk, water thundering over me.
Judging by the level it was coming in, I knew she was sinking fast.

I felt an odd mixture of sensations: fear, panic, even slight amusement at the fact that there was a camera attached to the back of the boat taking these dramatic shots of the storm, and my sinking boat, that no one would ever see.
Then I snapped into autopilot.


Steven Callahan shows how he used pencils to make a rough navigation tool that he used aboard his raft, after his boat sank, leaving him adrift for 76 days
Provided by Robert Sennott/ "76 days adrift" 
 
I started to pack my life-raft but realised that I'd have to dive down into the cabin if I wanted to get essential survival items – water, food, flares, a spear gun and sleeping bag.
The boat was almost completely submerged, but I held my breath and went under again and again.
I remember the water below seemed so peaceful compared with the sea raging outside.
It felt like entering a watery tomb.

I clambered, exhausted, on to the inflatable rubber raft and attached it to the end of a rope that was tied to the boat – to me, it still felt like a lifeline.

That night, I huddled under the canopy of my 6ft circular raft with waves beating the sides, constantly baling out water with an old tin can.
Just before dawn, the rope came free from the boat and I knew I was totally alone.
I was now adrift in the middle of the Atlantic, 800 miles west of the Canaries but heading in the opposite direction.
All I had was a little food and enough water for a few days.


Steve Callahan: 'I woke up in my bunk, water thundering over me.
Judging by the level it was coming in, I knew she was sinking fast.' 
Photograph: Billy Black
 
In the coming days, I had a lot of time to think, and I regretted every mistake I'd ever made – I was divorced, and felt I had failed at human relations generally, at business and now even at sailing.
I desperately wanted to get through it so I could make a better job of my life.

I kept a log, fished with my spear gun and made water with a solar still, a contraption that took me days to get working properly, producing just over a pint a day.

Around day 14 I saw a ship, lit a flare and thought I'd been seen – but it just went right on by.
Every morning came with a bit of hope, but by each afternoon I was in despair.
I did see a handful of ships, but none of them saw me.
After a month at sea, I'd drifted right through the shipping lanes.

As I moved into tropical waters, it became hotter and the dehydration unbearable.
One of the worst parts of being adrift for so long was the physical discomfort, the salt-water sores on my skin, the hunger and constant thirst.

By day 50, I'd been struggling for 10 days to keep the raft afloat with a pump after part of it ripped.
I was at my lowest.
I broke down and gave up.
But then I got scared by the thought I would be dead in a few hours; I found a way to fix the raft and it felt like the biggest victory of my life.


The next phase was just hanging on to life, really, looking at my watch, watching the minutes drag by.
In the last few days, the solar stills packed up and I figured this must be the end.
I had three cans of water left.
My body and mind were shutting down; it was as if I could feel all the people who had ever been lost at sea around me.
I had no more to give.

Soon after, I was spotted by some fishermen off Guadeloupe after they'd seen birds hovering over the raft.
The fish guts that I had thrown back into the sea had attracted both seabirds and fish, and a whole eco-system had sprung up around my raft.
By the time the fishermen reached me, I had lost a third of my body weight, and it was six weeks before I could walk properly again.


 
I still don't regret my 76 days alone in the raft.
To this day I feel enlightened by what I went through because it changed me for the better.
But would I want to be adrift in the ocean again?
No way.
 
Links :

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Iraq’s nautical charts and the northern Gulf power struggle

Photo Credit: The Cradle

From The Craddle by Mawada Iskandar

Baghdad’s deposit of new maritime coordinates at the UN reopens a decades-old boundary file and shifts the balance of power across ports, trade corridors, and energy routes in the northern Persian Gulf.

In the northern Persian Gulf, maritime lines have always carried political weight.
What may appear as technical coordinates on a chart often marks the boundary between access and constraint, leverage and vulnerability.

Iraq’s recent deposit of updated nautical charts with the UN – defining its baselines, territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and continental shelf – has reopened a dispute with Kuwait that traces back to the post-1990 settlement and continues to shape the strategic equilibrium along the Gulf’s northern edge.

On 19 January and 9 February 2026, Iraq formally lodged the coordinates under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), asserting what it describes as its sovereign maritime rights, particularly around Buoy 162 in Khor Abdullah – the narrow artery through which Iraq’s southern ports breathe. The move was framed in Baghdad as long overdue consolidation of national entitlements.

Kuwait responded swiftly, characterizing the step as unilateral and legally contentious, arguing that the Iraqi coordinates intersect with prior arrangements and impinge on Kuwaiti sovereignty in areas including Fasht al-Aij and Fasht al-Qid.
What might appear as cartography has reopened one of the most sensitive files in post-1990 Gulf politics. 
 
Iran-Irak-Kuwait with the GeoGarage platform (UKHO nautical raster chart)

A century-old boundary left unresolved

The maritime dispute between Iraq and Kuwait predates both states in their modern form.
When Kuwait was under British protection following the 1899 agreement, early attempts were made to delineate borders with Ottoman-administered Iraq.
The 1913 Anglo–Ottoman Convention sketched outlines but was never implemented after the outbreak of World War I, leaving Khor Abdullah unresolved.

The 1922 Uqair Conference addressed land boundaries in the region, later formalized in 1932 and acknowledged by Iraq in 1963.
Maritime demarcation, however, remained unsettled.
After Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait, UN Security Council Resolution 833 (1993) demarcated the land border and divided Khor Abdullah at Buoy 162, leaving deeper maritime areas subject to a bilateral understanding.

Following the 2003 Iraq War and the toppling of Saddam Hussein, Baghdad and Kuwait resumed diplomatic relations and signed the 2012 Khor Abdullah Navigation Agreement, ratified by the Iraqi parliament in 2013 and registered with the UN.

The agreement faced sustained domestic opposition in Iraq.
In September 2023, Iraq’s Federal Supreme Court ruled the ratification unconstitutional due to procedural deficiencies, effectively reopening the maritime file and returning Baghdad to the option of unilateral technical demarcation under international law.
 
The submission defines Iraq’s straight baselines and those based on the lowest low-water line for measuring its territorial sea.
 
What Baghdad’s submission recalibrates

Iraq’s new deposit marks a departure from a maritime status quo that has constrained its access to open waters since 1993.

With only 58 kilometers of coastline and heavy dependence on Khor Abdullah, Iraq has long argued that its maritime depth is structurally limited.
By submitting coordinates consistent with UNCLOS provisions, Baghdad seeks to ground its claims within a formal legal framework rather than rely on provisional understandings.

The coordinates extend into areas where Iraqi interests intersect with those of other Gulf Arab states and Iran.
They also overlap with offshore hydrocarbon prospects, including the Durra/Arash field – contested between Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Iran – and areas such as Jamal Tuyina 2.
By formalizing its maritime limits, Iraq positions itself as a recognized stakeholder in any future resource arrangements.

According to Maj. Gen. Jamal al-Halbousi, a member of Iraq’s border demarcation committee, the official objective is regulation of maritime activity, protection of ports, and navigational safety. Strategically, the step strengthens Iraq’s hand in negotiations and signals that Baghdad intends to operate as an equal maritime actor in the northern Persian Gulf rather than a confined littoral state.

Khor Abdullah and the leverage of passage

At the heart of the dispute lies Khor Abdullah, the channel separating Iraq’s Al-Faw Peninsula from Kuwait’s Boubyan and Warba islands.
For Iraq, the waterway connects Umm Qasr and Khor al-Zubair to global trade routes.
Any restriction reverberates immediately through supply chains and revenue streams.

For Kuwait, the same corridor is central to the Mubarak al-Kabir Port project on Boubyan Island. Geography ensures that neither state can ignore the other.
Control over navigation in this narrow passage translates into influence over trade flows in the northern Gulf.

The Development Road and Al-Faw: Iraq’s logistical wager

The maritime recalibration coincides with Iraq’s most ambitious infrastructure undertaking in decades: the Development Road project.
Designed to link Basra to the Turkish border through an integrated network of highways and railways spanning more than 1,200 kilometers, the project aims to position Iraq as a transit corridor connecting Asia to Europe.

At its center stands the Grand Port of Al-Faw, envisioned as a deep-water hub capable of receiving ultra-large container vessels.
The submerged Basra Tunnel beneath the Shatt al-Arab forms a critical component, linking rail and road networks directly to port facilities.

Iraq’s Ministry of Transport has reported advanced completion rates across key segments: the railway link from the tunnel reportedly exceeds 80 percent, the highway component approaches similar levels, and core port infrastructure – including navigation channels and container berths – has progressed significantly.
These figures require independent verification but reflect the government’s narrative of accelerated implementation.

In April 2024, AD Ports Group signed a cooperation agreement with Iraq’s General Company for Ports to support development and operation at Al-Faw.
The same month, Iraq, Turkiye, Qatar, and the UAE signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) outlining operational frameworks for the Development Road.
The project’s estimated budget stands at approximately $17 billion, structured in phased implementation extending to 2050.

For Baghdad, maritime demarcation and infrastructure expansion are interlinked.
A secure legal maritime footing strengthens investor confidence and reinforces Iraq’s bid to reposition itself as a logistical crossroads within the northern Gulf trade architecture.
 
 
Map of Iraq's Al-Faw Port and Dry Canal projects.

Mubarak Port and Kuwait’s counterweight

Kuwait’s Mubarak al-Kabir Port, launched in 2011 at an estimated initial cost of $1.1 billion, represents its own strategic gambit.
In December 2025, Kuwait signed a contract valued at nearly $4 billion with China State Construction and Transportation Company to complete the first phase.

The port is expected to integrate with regional rail networks, including proposed Gulf railway links and a Kuwait–Saudi line projected between 650 and 700 kilometers.

These developments situate Mubarak within broader connectivity initiatives linked to Belt and Road corridors.
Its geographic proximity to Iraq and Iran gives it potential leverage as a northern Persian Gulf transshipment node.

Internal Kuwaiti debate has intensified, with parliamentarians criticizing delays and warning that Iraq’s Al-Faw project could erode Kuwait’s share of regional maritime traffic.

Sovereignty, escalation, and political pressure

Iraqi officials insist the UN deposit is a sovereign legal act consistent with UNCLOS.
The Council of Ministers has described it as an affirmation of territorial and maritime rights, while the Foreign Ministry emphasized that the submission cannot be nullified, though objections may be lodged through diplomatic channels.

Members of parliament have framed the coordinates as essential groundwork for offshore resource development and future negotiations.

Lawmakers argue that the maps establish a legal basis for investing in marine resources, including transboundary fields, facilitate management of shared reservoirs, and strengthen the Ministry of Oil’s authority to explore and safeguard national entitlements.

Parliamentary sessions are reportedly being scheduled to translate the technical filing into executive action, including potential steps toward offshore oil and gas exploration in areas covered by the new charts.

At the same time, Iraqi authorities handling the Khor Abdullah file are preparing to formally advance the Federal Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling that invalidated the ratification of the 2012 navigation agreement.
Submitting that ruling within international legal channels would reinforce Baghdad’s argument that previous maritime arrangements lack constitutional standing, potentially reopening discussion of the demarcation at Buoy 162 and beyond.

In effect, the deposit of coordinates is paired with a legal and political escalation designed to reassert Iraqi discretion over how its maritime boundary is interpreted and implemented.

Gulf reactions and regional anxieties

Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states have urged Iraq to adhere strictly to international law and bilateral understandings, expressing concern that the coordinates affect areas long regarded as sensitive. Saudi Arabia has signaled apprehension that Iraqi claims intersect with portions of the submerged divided zone shared by Riyadh and Kuwait, an area linked to energy reserves.

Some regional actors worry that a fully operational Al-Faw Port could recalibrate northern Persian Gulf trade patterns, challenging established hubs.
Egyptian and Jordanian commentary has linked the project to broader regional transit dynamics, including implications for the Suez Canal and overland pipelines.

Within Iraq, political figures and activists have rejected what they describe as external pressure.
MP Ali al-Fatlawi criticized Jordan’s alignment with Kuwait and called for a firm national stance to defend sovereign and economic interests.

Media narratives and geopolitical undercurrents

Segments of Gulf media have portrayed Iraq’s move as politically motivated, suggesting it coincides with internal governance uncertainties.
Separately, the Kuwaiti cabinet issued an official statement calling on Iraq to engage in accordance with international law and to take historical relations into account.

Commentators in Kuwait, including the ‎President of the Tarous Center for Studies, Mohammed Al-Thunayan, have speculated about regional power dynamics influencing Baghdad’s decision, including the role of Iran.

On social media platforms, some Kuwaiti voices advanced more assertive positions.
Posts circulated arguing that Kuwait’s maritime facilities extended to Iraq in Khor al‑Zubair in 1993 out of consideration for navigational depth toward Umm Qasr, and that Kuwait should reconsider the balance of regulatory authority within the shared waterway.

Others went further, calling for the quadrilateral Al‑Faw framework – involving Iraq, Turkiye, the UAE, and Qatar – to be linked explicitly to strict compliance with UNCLOS and for a return to the 2012 Khor Abdullah navigation agreement as a precondition for broader cooperation.

These arguments have not been formalized as state policy, but they reveal how rapidly the maritime dispute has become entangled with intra‑Gulf competition.
Debate has also surfaced regarding the participation of Emirati and Qatari entities in Al‑Faw’s development, with some commentators suggesting that regional port rivalries and strategic calculations now intersect with the legal contest over maritime boundaries in the northern Persian Gulf.

What is really at stake in Iraq’s maritime recalibration?
  • Iraq breaking free from post-1990 constraints imposed under exceptional circumstances
  • Kuwait defending a strategic buffer that underpins its northern Gulf leverage
  • A wider Gulf struggle over ports, corridors, and who controls regional trade flows
  • The emergence of a new balance of power in the Persian Gulf shaped by infrastructure, not warships
The legal battleground ahead

Legally, the dispute hinges on methodological principles.

Iraq appears to have relied primarily on the median line approach in defining maritime limits.
Some Iraqi experts argue that Khor Abdullah, as Iraq’s sole deep-water access, justifies consideration of Thalweg principles or geographic necessity doctrines, emphasizing depth and navigational viability.

Resolution 833 remains binding regarding land demarcation, and Iraq’s UN submission does not amend that boundary.
Rather, it establishes coordinates for maritime zones subject to interpretation under UNCLOS.

Article 46 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties allows states to challenge agreements ratified in violation of constitutional procedures, a provision Baghdad may invoke regarding the 2012 navigation agreement.

Analysts, including commentary published by the Atlantic Council, have suggested that recourse to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) remains a possible avenue should bilateral negotiations stall, pointing to precedents such as the Qatar–Bahrain maritime dispute.

A contest over routes and regional weight

Iraq’s deposit of nautical charts is formally a sovereign administrative act. In practical terms, it forms part of a wider contest over sea lanes, ports, and the economic geography of the northern Persian Gulf.
As Al-Faw and Mubarak advance, maritime lines translate into trade leverage, and infrastructure becomes an instrument of influence.

Baghdad’s decision signals that it does not intend to remain confined by arrangements forged under extraordinary post-war conditions in the early 1990s.
Whether the dispute proceeds through negotiation or international adjudication, the outcome will shape the commercial and strategic architecture of the Gulf for decades.

Maritime coordinates may be measured in degrees and minutes, but their consequences are measured in power.

Links :

Monday, March 2, 2026

What happens if Iran shuts down the Strait of Hormuz?

 
From Wired by Carla Sertin

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most sensitive pressure points in the global economy. Conflict in Iran could put it at risk indefinitely.

A DISRUPTION IN the Strait of Hormuz—the world’s most critical energy chokepoint—in the aftermath of US-Israeli attacks on Iran would not stay confined to the Gulf.
Analysts say it could trigger a new inflation shock across the global economy, complicating monetary policy and putting pressure on the currencies of energy-importing countries.
The semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that the “Strait of Hormuz is shut down” following the strikes on Iran in the early hours of February 28.
Vessels operating near the strait have also reported VHF radio warnings from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards warning that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz."
On Sunday morning, authorities in Oman said that an oil tanker was attacked off the country's port of Khasab, which is in the Strait of Hormuz.
It's unclear who conducted the strike.
 

Why the Strait Matters
 
Strait of Hormuz with the GeoGarage platform (UKHO nautical raster chart)

Data from the US Energy Information Administration shows that about 20 million barrels of oil and petroleum products passed through the Strait of Hormuz each day in 2024—roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption.


Infographic showing map of the Gulf with refineries and liquefied natural gas terminals operational in February 2026, as well as maritime tanker traffic in the Gulf region.
INFOGRAPHIC: NALINI LEPETIT-CHELLA AND OMAR KAMAL/GETTY IMAGES

The waterway is also critical for gas markets, with around 20 percent of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade moving through the corridor linking the Gulf to the open ocean.

In practical terms, disruption in the strait would remove a significant share of the world’s energy supply from global markets almost immediately.
Legal Status and Market Reactions
The United Kingdom’s maritime monitoring center, United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, said radio messages declaring the strait closed are not legally binding under international law.
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, transit through international straits remains protected unless physically prevented.
But markets and shipping companies often react to risk signals long before any formal blockade occurs.
Data cited by S&P Global Commodity Insights showed that vessel traffic in the strait dropped by roughly 40-50 percent within hours on Saturday, as ships rushed to leave the area while new arrivals hesitated to enter.


A motorboat cruises along the shore off the town of Al Jeer on the Strait of Hormuz, with a tanker seen in the background, on February 25, 2026. PHOTOGRAPH: FADEL SENNA/GETTY IMAGES
 
The analysis company's Commodities at Sea monitoring also recorded outbound oil and product flows averaging about 20.4 million barrels per day in February to date, slightly below January levels—evidence that geopolitical tension alone can slow shipments before any physical disruption occurs.
"Hormuz risk is not only about closure but also fleet productivity. If Iran escalates by seizing tankers or using drones to threaten commercial traffic, voyage times and possibly costs for Middle East oil exports would further increase," S&P Global CERA analysts said.
Multiple shipping companies have already reported that they are avoiding the Strait of Hormuz and expect delays and rescheduling of shipments.
 

What Would Closing the Strait Mean?
 
There is no alternative export system at comparable scale. Saudi Arabia and the UAE operate bypass pipelines, but these cover only a portion of Gulf flows, while Iraq, Kuwait, and Qatar lack meaningful alternatives.
If the strait formally closed, most oil exports from the Gulf would be cut off from the world almost immediately
 
How shipping slowed to a stop through the strait of Hormuz
source : The Guardian
 
Even if Saudi Arabia and the UAE pushed their alternative pipelines to the limit, analysts say about two-thirds of Gulf exports would still be stuck.
LNG markets would also be hit.
Qatar, the world’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas—a super-cooled form of natural gas shipped by tanker—depends almost entirely on the Strait of Hormuz to export its fuel.
If the route were blocked, Asian buyers could lose their key suppliers within days.
Asian economies such as Japan, South Korea, China, and India depend heavily on imported LNG to generate electricity.
Getting oil from elsewhere, like the Atlantic, would mean longer shipping times and higher costs, potentially pushing prices even higher.

 
How It Could Affect Consumers

Historical modeling suggests that sudden loss of Gulf supply could push oil prices sharply higher.
If that happens, the effects would likely reach global consumers quickly: higher gas prices, more expensive airline tickets, and rising transport costs that feed into the price of food and goods.
Financial markets typically react even before physical shortages appear, with oil futures rising, transport-sector equities weakening, and currencies of major energy exporters strengthening as traders price in the risk of disruption.
Strategic petroleum reserves could moderate the shock, but releases take time and cannot fully substitute for Gulf crude grades.
Inside the Gulf, stopping exports would quickly strain government finances.
Countries such as Iraq, Kuwait, and Qatar rely heavily on oil revenues to fund public spending.
If shipments halted, storage facilities could fill rapidly, forcing producers to cut output and lose income.
Shipping effects would extend beyond oil.
Tanker rerouting, insurance repricing, and naval risk zones tend to raise freight rates across bulk commodities and container shipping, impacting worldwide logistics.
 
Links :

Sunday, March 1, 2026

Greenland's Petermann Glacier

 
e-GEOS is monitoring the Petermann Glacier 
since the 2010 using both Modis (optical) and COSMO-SkyMed (RADAR) data.

 
On August 5, 2010, an enormous chunk of ice, roughly 97 square miles in size, broke off the Petermann Glacier, along the northwestern coast of Greenland.
The glacier lost about one-quarter of its 40-mile long floating ice shelf, the Northern Hemisphere's largest.
It's not unusual for large icebergs to calve off the Petermann Glacier, but this new one is the largest to form in the Arctic since 1962.

Saturday, February 28, 2026

Let's stick together


Penguin leaps to safety as ice breaks

Friday, February 27, 2026

Why is the North at the top of the map: from Mesopotamia to Mercator, the compass, European navigation, and distortions that make northern countries appear gigantic to the naked eye even today.

Understand how European navigation, the compass, and the Mercator projection created north on the map and shaped the world maps you use today.

From ClickPetroleoegas by  Carla Teles

For millennia, different civilizations designed the world with the south, the east, or even the religious center at the top, but it was the European navigations of the Age of Discovery that established the north as "up" and spread this convention to the entire planet.


For most of human history, Maps didn't have an obvious "top".
Clay tablets in Mesopotamia, maps with the south highlighted in Egypt, Chinese maps with the north at the top because of the imperial throne, Arabic maps with the south at the top because of Mecca, and European Christian maps with the east at the top to honor Eden.
Each culture projected onto the map what it considered most sacred, most central, or most useful.

The turning point came when European navigation on the open sea began to depend directly on the compass and the Mercator projection.
By aligning world maps with the needle pointing north, cartographers like Gerardus Mercator created a model that made life easier for captains, but also introduced cartographic distortion, making northern countries appear larger and more important on the map than they actually are.
Before the European voyages: the world turned upside down.
 
In the earliest cartographic records from Mesopotamia, around 2300 BC, 
maps were administrative tools.

Hand-sized clay tablets depicted rivers, fields, and cities, helping temples and palaces control land and resolve border disputes between neighbors.
There was no standardized orientation.
Each scribe drew according to their own logic.

In ancient Egypt, the criterion was almost entirely based on affection.
The Egyptians placed the south at the top.
Because the Nile came from the south and was seen as the source of life, fertility, and agriculture.

Placing the south "on top" was a way of honoring the source of survival.
This view influenced other African peoples.

In China, the map reflected imperial protocol.
The emperor sat facing south.
And the throne was located on the north side of the hall.

Maps began to be drawn as if the emperor were looking out over his territory, with the north at the top and the rest opening up below.
It was a choice.
politics and ceremony.

In the Islamic world, during the Golden Age, cartographers such as al idrisi They produced some of the most accurate maps of the period, with the south at the top and Africa highlighted.

Mecca was located south of many important regions, and this direction took on symbolic weight.
These maps were used by navigators from various cultures, long before the great...
European navigations to gain the prominence you learn about in school.

In Christian Europe, the so-called TO maps placed the east at the topJerusalem at the center and Christ above all, blessing the world.

They were theological maps, not navigational tools.
The goal was to present a religious worldview, not to help ships cross oceans.
Ptolemy, the compass, and the rediscovery of a world in coordinates.

The mathematical basis of the modern map comes from Claudius PtolemyA geographer from the 2nd century who lived in Alexandria.
In his work "Geography," he compiled coordinates from thousands of locations, defined latitude and longitude, and proposed a systematic way of representing the Earth.

Ptolemy lived in the northern hemisphere, was primarily familiar with lands north of the Equator, and considered that part of the globe to be more relevant and more detailed.

It is no coincidence that the areas known to the Greeks and Romans, concentrated in the north, gained prominence in the upper part of the map.

But medieval Europe lost this knowledge for over a thousand years.
The work survived in the Islamic world and the Byzantine Empire.

It was only in 1406, when Jacopo d'Angelo translated "Geography" into Latin, that the European intellectual elite regained access to this method.

During this same period, another piece enters the board: the compass, likely brought to Europe by Arab merchants.
The needle consistently pointed north.

The navigators of Genoa and Venice realized that if the map was drawn with north at the top, it was much easier to align the chart with the compass at sea.

Portolan charts, used on coastal routes, began to be made with north at the top for purely practical reasons.
It was faster to read the map, rotate it less, and make fewer mistakes.

From then on, north began to consolidate as the preferred upward direction, even before the era of the great giants.
European navigations oceanic rocks explode.
European navigations: when the north rises and never falls again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Pkqgv135v8

The definitive turning point happens with the explosive combination of three factors: Compass, maritime ambition, and European navigation on the open sea..

The European kingdoms entered the era of great [powers/powers].
European navigations Driven by trade, faith, and power, Portugal, Spain, and later other powers, sought routes to new lands, spices, metals, and markets.
However, Nautical charts did not keep pace with the ambition of the ships..

Navigating for weeks without seeing land required plotting a straight route on a map and following that direction with a compass.
But the Earth is a sphere and the map is flat.

A straight line on paper did not correspond to a simple route on a curved surface.And navigators needed to recalculate their position all the time.
An accumulated error could mean hundreds of kilometers of deviation.

It is in this context of Risky European voyages, ships getting lost and fleets disappearing.
Then Gerardus Mercator enters the scene.

He studies Portuguese and Spanish charts, analyzes errors, and realizes he needs a projection tailored for someone who lives with a compass in hand.
Mercator: the orphan who aligned maps, compass, and European navigation.
 


Gerard de Kramer, son of a shoemaker, orphaned at 14, becomes Gerardus Mercator by Latinizing his own name.
He studies Latin, philosophy, history, geography, is imprisoned for heresy, freed by pressure from the university and, already at 40 years old, sets up his cartographic workshop.

He spends years studying letters from Portuguese and Spanish navigators, right in the middle of the era of the great European navigationsThe problem is clear: the map doesn't communicate properly with the compass.

It was necessary to create a projection in which it would be possible to draw a straight line between two points and follow a...
steady direction on the Earth's surface.

In 1569, at the age of 57, Mercator published his great world map, with a title that defined it as "correct for use in navigation".

In him, Lines of latitude and longitude intersect at right angles, forming a rectangular grid., a map full of squares.

The key point is this: A straight line on the Mercator map corresponds to a route of constant bearing relative to north., something that the compass is able to keep track of.

A navigator could position the map with north at the top, draw a line from point A to point B, measure the angle relative to north, and follow that course at sea without seeing land.

North is on top because The projection was designed to work in conjunction with the compass....and the compass points north.
The map becomes a precision instrument for...
European navigations...and not just an illustration of the world.

With ships, weapons, and colonial power, Europeans began to redraw the entire world using the Mercator projection..

When they arrive in a new territory, they don't adopt local maps.
They ignore African, Chinese, or Arab traditions and rewrite everything aligned to the north.

The standard that served navigation purposes would gradually become the standard that governs school maps, government maps, and, today, the maps on your cell phone.
Distortions that make the north seem bigger and more important.

The Mercator projection solves one navigation problem, but creates another: distorts the size of countries, especially at high latitudes.

Since it is impossible to flatten the curved surface of the Earth without deforming anything, Mercator chooses to preserve angles and directions of bearing at the expense of areas.

The result is clear.
Greenland appears gigantic, almost the size of Africa, when in reality it is much smaller.


Northern countries are stretched and enlarged, gaining a disproportionate visual presence.
Regions near the Equator, many of them in the global south, are compressed and visually diminished.

These distortions are not merely technical.
They influence how we perceive importance, power, and centrality in the world., symbolically inflating the global north.

A projection created to serve the European navigations This ended up reinforcing, graphically, the idea that the north is larger, occupies more space, and therefore deserves more attention.

When you open Google Maps, you see a digital version of this logic: a rectangular grid, north at the top, and northern countries large and comfortable on the screen.

The standard has survived empires, technological revolutions, and ended up in your pocket without you ever having voted for it.
Seeing the world through other maps

None of this means that the Mercator projection is "wrong." It is brilliant for what it was created for.: to guide navigation routes with a constant course, integrated with the compass, in the full era of European navigations oceanic.

The problem begins when a specific map is treated as if it were the only "natural" way to see the planet.

You can look at other projections that better preserve the areas of countries, that reposition the Equator, or even that place the south at the top, as the Egyptians and Arabs did.

Changing projections is, in a way, changing one's point of view on the world.
By changing the map, you also change the narrative about what is at the center, what is on the margins, and who appears bigger or smaller.

The next time you open a map, remember that you're not seeing an absolute truth.
You're seeing the planet.
Through the eyes of a 16th-century orphan, surrounded by religious wars, who spent his life trying to map the Earth to aid navigation..

His name was Gerardus Mercator, and it was the need for alignment between maps, compass, and European navigations which put the north on top forever.

So, after learning this story, do you think we should continue using maps with north at the top, or is it worthwhile to popularize other projections that challenge this standard?
 
Links :

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Say goodbye to the undersea cable that made the global Internet possible

illustration : Rob Vargas
 
From Wired by Jane Ruffind

History was unmade last year, as engineers began the massive project of ripping the first-ever transoceanic fiber-optic cable from the ocean floor.
Just don’t mention sharks.

SHARKS ARE INNOCENT.
Or at least they’re not eating the internet.
As a family of cartilaginous fish, sharks are collectively not guilty of most, if not all, charges of biting, chomping, chewing, or otherwise attacking the underwater network of fiber-optic cables.
The people who build and maintain the nearly 600 subsea cables that carry almost all of our intercontinental traffic—supporting just about every swipe, tap, Zoom, and doomscroll anywhere on the planet—have a love-hate relationship with this myth, which has persisted for decades.
They might even hate that I’m starting this piece with it.

If a cable is suspended over the seabed, a shark might gum it as it explores.
Sometimes they’ll lunge for a cable that’s being pulled out of the water.
But for a shark to actually bite a cable, you’d have to wrap it in fish, much as you’d hide a pill in a hunk of cheese for the dog.
Rats can be a threat on land, because their incisors never stop growing, so they like to file them down on semisoft cables.
But nobody ever asks about rats, maybe because, as a friend of mine pointed out, “sharks make you cool, but rats sound like you have a problem.”

Sometimes people ask about satellites or, especially in Sweden (where I live), about alleged sabotage in the Baltic Sea.
But historically, shark bites have commanded the most attention.
The myth began nearly 40 years ago, with the development of a subsea fiber-optic cable known as TAT-8.
TAT-8 practically invented the concept of an internet cable, and now that it’s ready for retirement, I spent time with the offshore workers, crew members, and engineers who are in the process of pulling it off the seabed.
That’s the real story of subsea cables—not sabotage or sharks, but the humans who take care of the physical stuff that keeps all of our digital communication flowing.

FIBER-OPTIC TRANSMISSION IS a near-magical way of carrying information by pulses of light.
Most people don’t even think about how quickly we’ve accepted instantaneous communication as normal, even those of us who can remember when an international phone call had to be booked in advance.
The more people I meet in this industry, in this network of networks of people and things, the more insulting it sounds to hear that “we” only notice it when it breaks.
(Who is this “we,” I always want to know?)
Billions of people are able to walk around not noticing this infrastructurebecause of the daily work of a few thousand people, sometimes at sea, other times buried under piles of permits, surveys, and purchase orders for thousands of kilometers of cables that will join the millions of kilometers of cables on the seabed that ensure that our planet is continuously being hugged by light.

I also need to clear up something else.
Most people call them “internet cables,” but technically, fiber-optic transmission was developed for telephone calls.
One of the people involved was an English scientist named Alec Reeves, who also spent his time working on psychokinesis and telepathy.
With fiber, voices become light, pulsate across spiderweb-thin strings of glass, and become voices again in your handset on the other end.
Maybe there isn’t that much of a conceptual leap between that and moving things with your mind.

TAT is short for Trans-Atlantic Telephone, and TAT-8—built by AT&T, British Telecom, and France Telecom—was the eighth transoceanic system across the Atlantic.
It was the first to use optical fibers to transmit traffic between Europe and the United States.
Fiber optics for communication had only been worked out in theory in the 1960s, and terrestrial cables were first used in the 1970s.
But using this technology to span continents was practically tantamount to human galactic expansion.

When TAT-8 went into service on December 14, 1988, the science fiction writer Isaac Asimov spoke on video link from New York to audiences in Paris and London: “Welcome everyone to this historic transatlantic crossing,” he said, “this maiden voyage across the sea on a beam of light.” AT&T made a TV ad, in which an earnest voice-over promised a “worldwide intelligent network” where people could send information in any format to anyone they want.
Cue the montage of telephone operators: “This is the AT&T operator. You have a call booked for Poland?” 
“I have your call to Russia.” 
“What city in Cuba are you calling?”
If they were looking to inspire viewers, it wasn’t with the promise of the internet, which was still too niche for most of us to comprehend, but with the end of the Cold War.

TAT-8 would witness the fall of the Berlin Wall, the birth of the World Wide Web, the end of the Soviet Union, the dotcom boom, the end of Tory rule in the UK and the beginning of the Bush years in the US, the September 11 attacks, the dotcom crash, and the dawn of social media (it was Friendster).
Rather than being the last cable ever needed, as had originally been believed, it was full to capacity within 18 months, by which point there were other cables, like PTAT-1 across the Atlantic and TPC-3 in the Pacific.
By 2001, the TAT series was up to number 14.
After developing a fault that was too expensive to be worth fixing, TAT-8 was taken out of service in 2002.

It’s been sitting on the seabed until now.


The MV Maasvliet docks in Portugal to offload recovered fiber-optic cable.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

A view of the monitor in the ship's control area.
Photograph : Fiona Marron
 

Captain's controls on the Maasvliet.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

TAT-8 IS CURRENTLY being pulled up and sent for recycling by Subsea Environmental Services, one of only three companies in the world that’s made cable recovery and recycling its entire business.
Cable companies sometimes recover their own cables after they take them out of service, and some retired cables get new life in scientific research or military use, but most of them—most of the 2 million kilometers of it all—are still right where their former owners left them.
The seabed is a lot busier than you might think, so these operations are clearing space for new cables, along routes that are proven and efficient, rather than disturbing new sections of the sea floor.
And there’s good money in old cables if you know what you’re doing.

It’s after midnight on a cool August night, and my friend Fiona Marron—here to take photos and videos—and I are watching Subsea’s brand-new diesel-electric cable recovery vessel, the MV Maasvliet, dock in the Portuguese port of Leixões, just outside of Porto.
The 14 people on board are two weeks overdue because hurricane season arrived early, and they had to dodge storms Dexter and Erin, which meant they collected more stress and less cable than expected.
During the next week or so, they’ll offload 1,012 kilometers of TAT-8, resupply the ship, then set out again to pick up another load.

They drop the gangway, and there are hugs between the crew and Peter Appleby, operations manager from Subsea.
Up on the bridge, we meet Captain Alex Ivanov, who has been at sea for 30 years and still takes pictures of sunsets.
He scrolls through his phone to show Peter a blazing red and orange sky, then photos of some of the dorado he caught, because when cable ship people aren’t fishing for cable, some of them go fishing for fish.

Peter asks how Alex likes the ship.
Alex helped design it, and this is only its fourth trip out since it left drydock in January 2025.
The captain says he loves the diesel electric—the Maasvliet runs on three industrial Volvo truck engines—even though he says it isn’t as stable as the Rebecca, the company’s other vessel.
The bridge is high-tech and modern, but everything is touchscreens and sensors, and he says if he loses power, he loses everything.
Then he zips off, getting ready for tomorrow, when he’ll hand charge of the ship over to another captain, Vlad.
Vlad will show up wearing a new T-shirt that says “Everything can go wrong at sea” on the front and “Not on my fucking watch!” on the back.

The food serving area aboard the Maasvliet.
Photograph : Fiona Marron
 

The ship's fridge is restocked at port.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

Everyone who has been at sea will tell you that the most important people are the captain and the cook, and all good captains are servant leaders and will concede that the cook is more valuable.
Crew members are from Ukraine, Russia, Poland, Nigeria, and Kenya, and the cook knows everyone’s comfort foods.
Misha, the cook who’s now rotating out, heard one of the crew talking about how much he loved khinkali, Georgian soup dumplings, and the next Sunday they were on the tables.
Peter always brings cottage cheese, cream cheese, and cabbage when he meets a ship in port.
I’m suddenly aware that I’m not just a guest on a ship, I’m a middle-aged mom who has shown up at someone’s home without snacks or a host gift.
Fiona and I are also the first strangers any of these people have seen in two and a half months.

I’M HERE IN Leixões because I’m a researcher in the material culture of the subsea cable industry, and I consider it my business to help people understand that the networks we rely on are made of physical things, created and maintained by people, so that we can stop saying infrastructure is invisible as if the people are invisible too.

Another way to irritate a cable nerd is to suggest that low-Earth-orbit satellites—which are unreliable in bad weather, are harder to repair, and need to be replaced every five years—will one day be our main source of connectivity.
Satellites are still an important component for resilient physical infrastructure, especially in areas with few or no fiber connections, but they haven’t been able to compete on capacity since the 1990s.

Back in the 1970s, though, satellite technology seemed so promising that the Federal Communications Commission made it clear to AT&T: If you don’t do something revolutionary with cables, we’re not going to grant permission for any more intercontinental submarine connections.
At the time, cables relied on copper, and there’s only so much capacity you can cram into a bundle of wires.
So, in 1978, Bell Labs, along with its British counterpart, STC, committed to installing a nearly 6,000-kilometer-long submarine fiber connection between the US, UK, and France.
In Holmdel, New Jersey, Bell Labs began testing out cables, and in 1985 the company deployed its first live test system, known as Optican-1, between two of the Canary Islands.
Optican-1 worked, but it had a series of what are called shunt faults, where damage to the insulation interrupts the electrical signals.

Now, here come the sharks.
Elaine Stafford was the project manager for Optican-1.
In 1986, she was a rare young woman on the scene, on her way to Paris to present an update on the cable at the first of what would become the industry’s main research and development conference.
“I’m supposed to be giving this huge talk, that there’s this wonderful technology and it’s working fine, and it’s going into service, but we had this big question mark,” she recalls.
They didn’t know what had caused the faults.

Jack Sipress, who in Stafford’s recollection was two levels above her at Bell Labs, got on the bus to the conference center.
“And he says, ‘I have the shark teeth,’” Stafford tells me.
“He pulls them out and says, ‘These were pulled out of the faulted cable.’ So we went to the conference and announced to the world that it was shark teeth.”
AT&T even included four pages about shark-bite mitigation in its 36-page press kit for TAT-8.

To be clear, there still isn’t consensus that the sharks caused the shunt fault.
Sipress wasn’t lying about the teeth, but it’s hard to know what really happened.
Stewart Ash, who was part of the UK team at STC, insists that most shark claims really are false.
If the Optican-1 was installed with too little slack, though, and hung above the seafloor in some areas, a shark might’ve munched down.
“While we at STC didn’t believe it,” he says, “we were swept up in the frustration or fear that sharks could interrupt these very important, brand-new cables.”

To be absolutely sure, AT&T funded research at two aquariums: in Mystic, Connecticut, and Sarasota, Florida, where researchers let some dogfish and lemon sharks get a little hungry and then tested to see if they bit any of several different cables that were emitting electrical fields in different patterns.
They didn’t, except in seemingly random cases.
(To be certain about this myself, I took my shark-obsessed 5-year-old to a local aquarium, where we spent 15 minutes trying to figure out how a friendly 3-foot dogfish, whose mouth looks like the coin slot of an old payphone, could do more than give a cable a soft boop.)
Experts also went out into the ocean and pulled different species of sharks onto the deck to force-feed them sections of cable.
Sometimes they bit—wouldn’t you?
But there was absolutely no pattern.

Still, in the 1980s, despite there being no firm evidence that sharks were attracted to anything specific about the cables, the teams decided it wouldn’t hurt to build TAT-8 with a layer of steel between the polyethylene insulation and the fibers.
They sent shark teeth to the NYU School of Dentistry, to have molds made and mounted onto shark jaw simulators, which then chomped on sections of cable.
The result was that lightweight deep-sea fiber was produced, from the start, with what they called “fish bite protection,” which helps against abrasions and other types of everyday damage that can happen in the sea.
Turns out, we owe sharks a thank-you, and probably an apology for the force-feeding.

IT’S MORNING IN Leixões.
On the deck of the Maasvliet, I hover over a pile of TAT-8’s repeaters.
A long-haul submarine telecommunications cable needs repeaters to boost the optical signal to cross the distance, and TAT-8 had more than 100 of them, each encased in a watertight, pressure-tested housing that could survive up to 8,000 meters down.
A rubberized cone stretches from each side of the repeater, sheathing the cable, making the whole piece about 2 meters long.
In a pile, they look like a dead kraken, ready for one last writhe on the dewy deck.

Repeaters weigh about 400 kilograms.
It takes three people to pull one out of the water, cut it free from the cable, and slide it down a special ramp onto the deck.
The rubber casings are stamped with the dates when each one rolled off the line—July 27, 1987, December 23, 1987, February 19, 1988, and so on—and there are identification numbers and instructions painted on them.
Human hands painted the casings before they went into the water 38 years ago, and it’s humans who pull them out, also with their hands.

TAT-8 cable joints strapped to the deck of the Maasvliet.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

Everything about the cable recovery operation needs to be learned on the job, from somebody who carries the knowledge in their body.
A lot of the new crew relies on Stephen, who has chosen to stay at the position of coiler, the rank of ordinary seaman, rather than rising up the ranks as many of the others have.
He’s been with Subsea for 15 years, since the company started, and he trains everyone.
He loves the teamwork and wouldn’t dream of going onto a cargo ship—too much waiting around.

At sea, it’s part of a coiler’s job to stand in the cable tanks in the ship’s hold and grab the cable as it comes through the hatch from the deck above.
You grasp it, and as the ship tosses, you walk backward in slow circles to coil the cable in a neat stack, because fiber cable has to be coiled by hand.
You need to keep it tight, and you don’t want to break the cable.
It’s hard to get used to, Stephen says, because you get dizzy.
Another coiler describes the shifts as 14 cigarettes long.
Eight hours divided into half-hour blocks so you don’t get too woozy: 30 minutes on, 30 minutes off, up the ladder for two cigarettes.

Peter, the operations manager, hands two pairs of utility gloves to Fiona and me.
Do we want to go into the hold? Fiona says yes instantly.
I take longer.
It’s 10 meters down a vertical ladder, but I didn’t travel here to just stand at the top of a ladder and shout “What’s it like down there?”


Peter in one of the cable tanks in the ship's hold.
Photograph : Fiona Marron


Recovered TAT-8 cable.
Photograph : Fiona Marron
 

Fiber-optic cables tend to be skinnier than people expect.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

The ship’s hold has five cable tanks, each about half full.
Most people are surprised when they see how small a submarine telecommunications cable is, but even those are usually the black and yellow steel-armored portions used in shallow water.
This cable, from the deep-sea sections, is the diameter of a taper candle, and it looks like giant cooked spaghetti.
I try to imagine being in here when it’s 30 degrees Celsius, the ship tossing up and down, and trying to walk in slow, backward circles.

Now I want to know how the cable gets from the seabed into the hold in the first place.
Stephen, again, is the person to ask.
He turns down the music—a mix of Ukrainian techno, American classic rock, and a medium dose of death metal—to tell me about what everyone here seems to agree is the most exciting part of cable recovery: catching the cable.

First, you sail to the spot where you’re pretty sure your cable is.
They have a route positioning list, a spreadsheet that shows the precise coordinates of every joint, splice, and repair—along with who did it.
They know where the cable has been plow-buried, where and exactly when a repeater was laid, and the type of cable at every section: double-armored, single-armored, lightweight-armored (the contemporary name for the “fish-bite-proofed” cables).
To take the cable off the seabed, all you get is a hook, a rope, those coordinates, and your senses.
It’s roughly the same method they used in the 19th century when they needed to recover failed telegraph cables from the deep sea.

A flat grapnel hook, known as a “flatfish,” is dropped off the bow.
It falls past blobfish, anglerfish, the giant versions of crab and octopus, and below the deepest-dwelling sharks, down where fish have antifreeze for blood and names like “fangtooth” and “faceless fish.” “When it touches the bottom,” Stephen says, “we stop.” They have to keep the hook flat on the bottom, so they can start what they call the cutting run, sailing slowly toward the cable, at a speed of about one knot, dragging the flatfish.
“The speed matters,” he says.
“When we get to the position, we slow down to keep it from flying or dancing.” 
Everything Stephen tells me sounds like trying to fly a kite in space, except this is all done on the deck of a ship, with ocean swells sometimes over 3 meters—if the swells hit 4, it’s too harsh to work.

Rope, ready to be lowered into the ocean to recover cable.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

Once the hook is in place, you have one job: Keep your eye on the line, watch for a bite.
Someone spots tension in the rope, or the winch makes a move.
Whoever sees it calls out.
Sometimes it’s been three hours, sometimes 24, of rope-dropping and winch-watching.
They cut, pull, start the bow roller and winch, and wait to find out if the flatfish has the right catch.
I repeat a question Fiona has been asking everyone: 
Do you cheer when you catch it?
Of course they do.

Captain Alex has been working with Subsea since its early days.
“In the beginning, I didn’t have any idea how to capture the cable on the ocean floor and bring it on board,” he says.
Cables weren’t laid to be picked up again.
“Sometimes it’s difficult to find.
The cable can shift from its initial position or be blocked by gravel or sand.”
They’re still figuring it all out.
As Subsea cofounder John Theodoracopulos puts it: “I liken a lot of what we do to cleaning up space junk or all the oxygen bottles that are left at base camp at Everest.”

Now that I’ve seen all the planning and experience that goes into an operation to find and recover a cable, it’s even harder to take seriously the idea that enemy saboteurs are regularly pulling this off.
A more legitimate concern is disturbing the seabed, but researchers at the UK’s National Oceanography Center have started looking into the environmental impact of decommissioning, and it’s not as much as you might think.
The biggest impact seems to come from grapnel runs and from the vessels themselves.
Very few cables in service today cross sensitive ocean habitats.
Where that’s the case, they leave those segments in place.
They also only recover cable that’s sitting on the surface of the seabed, and they know exactly where it all is because of that spreadsheet.
Cables don’t even tend to attract sea life colonization very often.
The “reef effect” makes a cool story, but it seems that, just like sharks, most sea life is just not that into cables.


Captains Vlad and Alex aboard the Maasvliet.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

DEPARTING CREW MEMBERS are starting to say their goodbyes.
Captain Vlad is passing out nuts and chocolate; Alex will do the formal handover later today.
Chief engineer Sergei is just about done with the maintenance work needed to hand over to the next chief engineer, also named Sergei.
He barrels through the bridge, beelining to the “good” coffee machine.
“This coffee machine is my wife!” he shouts.
He’s from Crimea, and he’s been a seaman on and off since he was 16.
It’s his hobby, the best job in the world.

In a few days, the cable tanks will be empty.
Next, a cargo ship will arrive.
The bales will be loaded “breakbulk,” as it’s called—directly into the hold, the way it was done before containerization—and brought to South Africa, to Mertech Marine, which also specializes in cable recovery, which Theodoracopulos tells me is a “collegial competitor.”
Mertech is the only cable salvage company with a recycling facility of its own.
It will break the cables down: steel, copper, two kinds of polyethylene.

One of the carousels that spin the cable into bales.
Photograph : Fiona Marron

Cables are stored below decks before coiling.
PHOTOGRAPH: FIONA MARRON


Fiber was the successor to copper, but that’s just the transmission part.
Fiber-optic cables still have plenty of copper in them, and it’s of especially high quality.
The International Energy Agency says we’ll be running short of copper within a decade if the manufacturing world can’t find more of it, so thousands of kilometers of it is nothing to sniff at.
The fiber itself is just about the only part of the cable that doesn’t make sense to recycle, but there’s lots of steel, and that will become things like game and vineyard fencing.
Polyethylene is one of the easiest plastics to recycle, and that will be sent to a facility in the Netherlands, where it will be turned into pellets that can be used for non-food-grade plastics.
By the time you read this, you could be squeezing your shampoo from the remnants of the first fiber-optic cable that crossed the Atlantic, most of which spent 38 years deeper in the sea than the Greenland shark, which is known for being centuries old and extremely sleepy.

And what about the rest of what went into the TAT fiber systems? Bell Labs was eventually sold to the French company Alcatel, which closed the Holmdel facility in 2006.
It spent close to a decade as the largest empty office building in America and is now a mixed-use complex called Bell Works, although it’s probably most recognizable as the headquarters of Lumon Enterprises in the Apple TV show Severance.
The current owners found 18 kilometers of subsea fiber from an early sea trial for TAT-8 in the basement, and they commissioned an architecture firm to come up with ideas for what to do with it, among them a giant slinky.
No one has used the old Ocean Simulation Lab for a production set, but you can also rent that—on a production location website, you’ll find it labeled a “mad scientist’s lair.”

Some of the TAT-8 people are still around because there are two things that keep people in the subsea business: They like people, and they love messy problems.
“Even way back then,” says Stafford, the Optican-1 project manager, “it was connecting the world, doing things right, doing things well.”
The contrast between this world and what’s happening at the application layer isn’t lost on me.
And the shark research makes a lot more sense—they had a big bet, a blank check, and an almost heroic sense of pride in their work that drove them to go down even vanishingly small rabbit holes.

I suppose there’s a third reason a lot of the people are still around: Most people in this tiny industry are Generation X or older, and sometimes they cart around so much institutional knowledge that they can’t retire.
Stafford is near retirement age, and the guy who introduced me to her, Jean Devos, got his start making telegraph cables in the north of France in 1961 and still works as an adviser.
He’s 87.
The first thing Stafford said to me on Zoom was, “How is he? Does he look well?”
The subsea world has been trying to recruit and train younger talent for at least the past decade, so the industry vets can get their rest.

Now it’s my turn to leave, so I’m climbing around the ship, saying my goodbyes, having a few last chats in the smoking area outside the crew quarters—where everyone is when they aren’t working.
I was promised a small piece of TAT-8, and now I have it.
Before I get to the airport, I wrap my cable bundle in a shirtdress and pack it in my carry-on, a little panicked as I realize it looks a lot like a bundle of dynamite.
The Subsea guys also gave me a branded baseball cap, which has a stylized cross-section of submarine cable on it.
I put it on in the airport, in case it can answer questions about what’s in my bag.
Except, how many people know what subsea cables look like?
And you can’t wear a hat through security, so it goes into the bucket.
Nobody asks any questions.