Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Deadly coral disease sweeping Caribbean linked to wastewater from ships

 
A researcher off the Virgin Islands swims past a pillar coral showing signs of stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD).
Photographs: Lucas Jackson/Reuters


From The Guardian by Jewel Fraser


Researchers find ‘significant relationship’ between stony coral tissue loss disease and nearby shipping

A virulent and fast-moving coral disease that has swept through the Caribbean could be linked to waste or ballast water from ships, according to research.

The deadly infection, known as stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD), was first identified in Florida in 2014, and has since moved through the region, causing great concern among scientists.

It spreads faster than most coral diseases and has an unusually high mortality rate among the species most susceptible to it, making it potentially the most deadly disease ever to affect corals.
More than 30 species of coral are susceptible.
It was found in Jamaica in 2018, then in the Mexican Caribbean, Sint Maarten and the Bahamas, and has since been detected in 18 other countries.

In Mexico, more than 40% of reefs in one study had at least 10% of coral infected by SCTLD, and nearly a quarter had more than 30%.
In Florida, regional declines in coral density approached 30% and live tissue loss was upward of 60%.

Biologist Emily Williams moves corals between tanks as researchers try to find out more about an outbreak of SCTLD in Florida in 2019

Scientists have not yet been able to determine whether the disease is caused by a virus, a bacterium, a chemical or some other infectious agent, but the peer-reviewed study in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science supports the theory that ballast water from ships may be involved.
Conducted in the Bahamas by scientists at the Perry Institute for Marine Science, it found that SCTLD was more prevalent in reefs that were closer to the Bahamas’ main commercial ports, in Nassau and Grand Bahama, suggesting a likely link between the disease and ships.

Judith Lang, scientific director at the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment project, which has been tracking the disease, said: “The prevailing currents in the Caribbean push seawater to Florida and not in the reverse direction, and the predominant wind direction is westward.
So human dispersal [to those three territories] in 2018 seems necessary.”

In 2017, the spread of deadly pathogens by ships when they discharge ballast water prompted the International Maritime Organization to implement the Ballast Water Management Convention, which requires that ships discharge their ballast water – used to maintain the ship’s stability – 200 nautical miles from shore in water at least 200 metres deep before entering port, to ensure they do not bring in harmful foreign pathogens.

A research technician cuts a coral with a steel chisel to remove the section being killed by SCTLD, US Virgin Islands

In the Bahamas, SCTLD has spread rapidly since first being identified in December 2019.

Krista Sherman, senior scientist at the Perry Institute and a co-author of the recently published paper, said: “The disease is spread along about 75km of reef tract, about 46 miles – so for Grand Bahama that is a large structure of reef.
We’re talking about mostly covering the entire southern coastline of the island.”

The disease is also widespread in the coral reefs of New Providence, where the Bahamas’ capital, Nassau, and main port are located.
The study notes the presence of international container ships, cruise ships and pleasure boats at that location, as well as a fuel shipping station.

Infection rates among the most susceptible species were 23% and 45% across New Providence and Grand Bahama respectively, and recent mortality rates have reached almost 43%.

With the exception of two species, the researchers found “there was a significant relationship” between the disease and proximity of reefs to the major shipping ports.
They noted “an increasing proportion of healthy colonies as distance from the port increased on both islands, and a greater proportion of recently dead colonies closer to the port than farther away”.

The locations where SCTLD is prevalent in the Bahamas are all popular with tourists, recreational fishers and divers, Sherman said.

 
A research assistant applies an antibiotic ointment to a mountainous star coral affected by SCTLD near Key West, Florida

There are concerns that the coral disease could affect the country’s main fishery export, spiny lobster, said Adrian LaRoda, president of the Bahamas Commercial Fishers Alliance.
Although the lobster fishers work further out to sea, the industry would be affected if the reefs die.
The spiny lobster fishery brings in $90m (£66m) a year and employs 9,000 people.

“Any negative impact on our reefs would definitely drastically affect our spiny lobsters because the mature animals migrate [from the reefs] to the fish aggregating devices [a technique for catching fish],” LaRoda said.
He added that the lobsters’ reproduction rate and the food supply for juvenile lobsters in the reef would also be affected.

The Bahamian government has set up a national taskforce to tackle the problem.
Currently, the most effective treatment for the disease is the application of the antibiotic amoxicillin directly to the corals, which has seen some success in reducing mortality, but no realistic permanent solution is available.

According to Lang, rather than treating the symptoms, there is a need to tackle the possible human-made causes.
“Given a chance, nature can heal naturally,” she said.

Links :

Tuesday, July 27, 2021

The importance of surveying relic munitions and unexploded ordnance

Relic munitions and unexploded ordnance are a global problem, ubiquitously affecting European coastal waters.
The risk of possible detonations and environmental contamination hinders the development of many sectors of the blue economy — including offshore energy, shipping, aquaculture and tourism. 

From Euronews

For the police divers who work for the Schleswig-Holstein Bomb disposal unit in Kiel, their daily job is to go down into the murky cold sea to find lost weapons of war, a deadly legacy of the 20th century.

The coastal waters of Germany and other European countries are scattered with old munitions.
They rarely explode, but some can detonate if hit by an anchor.

Measures to protect the seafloor
 
On the day we visit Schleswig-Holstein's special unit, the bomb hunters are heading to the military port of Kiel.
Navy specialists have found a submerged explosive device close to the pier there.


 
As a rule, the divers try to extract the weapons for proper on-land disposal.
Only when that is not possible, are the bombs detonated on the seafloor.

Frank Ketelsen, Head of the diving operations at the Schleswig-Holstein Bomb disposal unit, tells us that if they must detonate a bomb in the water, they set up "air bubble curtains to protect marine mammals".

The tip of the iceberg
 
At the bomb unit headquarters, there are many samples of munitions from various periods and of different origins.
The collection is used to train new police officers.

Unexploded bombs found on land often make the news, but munitions on the seabed are rarely heard of, yet their quantity is unbelievable.

Oliver Kinast, Head of the Schleswig-Holstein bomb disposal unit, says that there's an estimated "1.6 million tonnes of munition from the World Wars in the North and Baltic Sea, 300 000 tonnes of which are in the Baltic Sea alone".
According to him though, those figures don't fully take into account munitions lost during battle operations.

The hunt for underwater munitions
 
Littorina, a scientific vessel from the GEOMAR institute, takes us along with a team of scientists to a large munitions dumpsite a few kilometres off the Baltic coast of Germany.
Two EU-funded projects, BASTA and ExPloTect, are testing new methods of finding bombs there: relic munitions are becoming a growing problem for marine industries and underwater ecosystems.

Aaron Beck is a researcher in aquatic biogeochemistry for the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel.
He has realised that the more they develop offshore resources, the more munitions they encounter and "the more they have to be cleaned up".
He thinks that "the biggest impetus for cleaning them up is wind farm installation, cable laying and so forth".

Polluting the sea
 
However, that is not the only problem these munitions pose. 
They are becoming big pollutants. 
"All of these munitions are in metal casings, and they all have been corroding for 70-80 years. We're coming up to a point where all the chemicals that have been inside will all start to come out", Aaron adds.

Much of the munitions on the seabed, both conventional and chemical, were deliberately disposed of in large numbers by the armed forces of many different countries.
Our knowledge of where exactly all these dumpsites are is patchy.

 
An AUV image of underwater munitions, chunks of TNT and other explosives
GEOMAR
 
Vehicles adapted for seafloor exploration
 
Autonomous underwater vehicles explore the seafloor quickly and efficiently.
They take pictures and measurements using a magnetometer.
Several of these devices can work simultaneously, which greatly reduces the costs.

On the seafloor, we see a hoard of decaying munitions that includes two-meter-long bombshells and bare chunks of toxic explosives.
Similar dumpsites can be found off the coasts of various countries in Europe and around the world.

AUV LUISE being lowered into the seaeuronews
 
The BASTA project vehicle, LUISE, explores the seafloor along a programmed trajectory, transmitting collected data to a ship.
The detailed photos and magnetic measurements, together with results of previously conducted acoustic scanning, reveal the exact shape of the suspicious objects and the presence of metal in their composition.

Marc Seidel, a Geophysicist for GEOMAR tells us that by combining the camera footage and the magnetic signatures that they measure, they get a good idea of what the object might be. Chemical analysis gives even more clarity.

'Silver bullet' technology

Scientists from the ExPloTect project are developing a sampling system with special filters for catching dissolved particles of explosive materials from the seawater.
Back on the ship, the samples are further concentrated and analysed with a compact mass spectrometer that indicates the presence of various explosives.
This method can drastically speed up detection of underwater munitions.

According to Aaron Beck, a researcher in aquatic biogeochemistry for the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, with the new chemical analysis, they've gone from two to three months from collecting a sample to getting the data to the whole process potentially only taking 15 minutes. 
"We need that kind of rapid response", he says.

 
The ExPloTect system visualisationK.U.M. Umwelt- und Meerestechnik Kiel

Developers call this new weapon in the fight against underwater munitions a "silver bullet".
It hits the target for many industrial sectors that now spend a lot of time and resources clearing unexploded ordnances (UXOs), off the seabed.

The technology is also helping out the environment.
Onno Bliss, Business Development Manager for K.U.M. Umwelt und Meerestechnik, says that they will adapt the technology to different kinds of structures.
It will enable them to do long-term "permanent environmental monitoring at known UXO fields".
Doing so is also another way to decide where to start clearing the munitions first.

But how can the huge amount of data collected by underwater vehicles be processed?

Artificial intelligence

Egeos, a company based in Kiel, is developing a software platform that brings together new scientific data and relevant historic records like old archives documenting coastal military operations.
The algorithms look for relevant data patterns, suggesting areas that are likely to be contaminated with munitions.

To the CEO and founder of Egeos, Jann Wendt, "automation is definitely helping".
The process is still quite manual, but they're improving every day. 
"We are getting smarter from the side of data analytics. We are getting smarter from the perspective of autonomous underwater vehicles, autonomous sensors that are capturing this data and that makes the whole process cheaper", he explains.

Clearing the seabed is a task with huge economic potential.
Private companies are already developing large-scale projects for the recovery and proper disposal of underwater munitions.
According to Aaron Beck, there's a whole industry of people able to find and clean up munitions on the seabed.
All they really need is the funding to be able to do so.

Huge masses of underwater munitions are rusting and will release toxic content into the seas in the near future.
Can we stop this ticking time bomb before it’s too late? 
 
Links :

Monday, July 26, 2021

Getting to the bottom of trawling’s carbon emissions


Trawling nets like these disturb delicate ocean floor ecosystems and inadvertently release stored carbon. Credit: Alex Proimos, CC BY 2.0

From EOS by Nacy Averett

A new model shows that bottom trawling, which stirs up marine sediments as weighted nets scrape the ocean floor, may be releasing more than a billion metric tons of carbon every year.

Bottom trawling, a controversial fishing practice in which industrial boats drag weighted nets through the water and along the ocean floor, can unintentionally dig up seafloor ecosystems and release sequestered carbon within the sediments.
For the first time, researchers have attempted to estimate globally how this fishing technique may be remineralizing stored carbon that, as the seabed is tilled, ends up back in the water column and possibly the atmosphere, where it would contribute to climate change.
“The ocean is one of our biggest carbon sinks, so when we put in more human-induced CO2 emissions…we’re weakening that sink.”“The ocean is one of our biggest carbon sinks,” said Trisha Atwood, who researches aquatic ecology at Utah State University.
“So when we put in more human-induced CO2emissions, whether that’s directly dumping CO2 into deep waters or whether that’s trawling and enhancing remineralization of this carbon, we’re weakening that sink.”

Atwood helped build a model that shows that bottom trawling may be releasing as much as 1.5 billion metric tons of aqueous carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, equal to what is released on land through farming.
Her work was part of a paper recently published in Nature that presents a framework for prioritizing the creation of marine protected areas to restore ocean biodiversity and maximize carbon storage and ecosystem services.

Estimating Carbon Loss from the Ocean Floor


To create the model, Atwood and her coauthors first needed to figure out how much of the ocean floor is dredged by trawlers.
They turned to data from the nonprofit Global Fishing Watch, which recently began tracking fishing activity around the world and compiled data on industrial trawlers and dredgers from 2016 to 2019.

The next step was to find data on how much carbon is stored in the world’s ocean sediments.
Because that information was not readily available, Atwood and colleagues built a data set by analyzing thousands of sediment cores that had been collected over the decades.

Last, they dug through the scientific literature, looking at studies that examined whether disturbances to the soil in coastal ecosystems, such as seagrasses, mangroves, and salt marshes, exposed carbon that was once deep in marine sediments and enhanced carbon production in the ocean.
 
 
A group of twin-rigged shrimp trawlers in the northern Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana.
The trawlers are trailed by a plume of sediment, suggesting that their nets are scraping against the seafloor.
Credit: SkyTruth Galleries, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0


“We lean really heavily on that literature,” said Atwood.
“We used a lot of the equations [in previous papers] to build our model and extend it into the seabeds in these more open ocean locations.
And from there, we were able to come up with this first estimate.”

Their investigation did not attempt to determine whether sequestered carbon that has been released by bottom trawling remains in the water column or is released into the atmosphere, although they noted potential problems either way.
In the paper, the authors noted that it is likely to increase ocean acidification, limit the ocean’s buffering capacity, and even add to the buildup of atmospheric CO2.

Atwood and the lead author of the paper, Enric Sala, a conservation ecologist who is also a National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence, are working with Tim DeVries, who studies ocean biogeochemistry at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and scientists at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center to build atmospheric models to try to figure out where the released carbon goes.

Existing Trawling Data May Be Too Scant


Not everyone, however, is convinced that Atwood and Sala’s model on bottom trawling and loss of carbon sequestration in marine sediments is accurate.
Sarah Paradis, who is studying the effects of bottom trawling on the seafloor for her Ph.D.
at the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology in Barcelona, is skeptical.

In an email to Eos, Paradis noted that since the 1980s, there have been fewer than 40 studies that address the impacts that bottom trawling has on sedimentary organic carbon.
These few studies are not enough to build a model on, she said, and in addition, the studies reach different conclusions.
Some studies have observed that bottom trawling decreases organic carbon content of the seafloor, whereas others show it increases organic carbon.“We in no way intended our model to be the end-all in the trawling conversation.
We hope that many more studies will come along that help produce more localized results.”In addition, Paradis wrote that lower organic carbon on the seafloor does not necessarily mean its remineralization to CO2.
Rather, it could simply mean loss of organic carbon through erosion, which means the carbon moves to another area of the seabed but very little is remineralized into CO2.
She pointed to several studies, including one that she was a part of, that showed loss of organic carbon through erosion.

“I want to emphasize that [the authors] address a very important issue regarding how bottom trawling, a ubiquitous and very poorly-regulated anthropogenic activity, is affecting the seafloor,” she wrote.
“But the values they propose are far from being credible.”

Atwood disagreed.
“We don’t need lots of studies on the effects of trawling because we built our model using decades of carbon cycling research,” she wrote in an email to Eos.
“Trawling is simply a perturbation that mixes and re-suspends sediments, leading to increases in carbon availability.
All we needed to know about trawling to apply a carbon model to it is where trawling occurs and how deep in the sediment the trawls go.”

In addition, Atwood said, “We in no way intended our model to be the end-all in the trawling conversation.
We hope that many more studies will come along that help produce more localized results.”

Links :

Sunday, July 25, 2021

Barrels



 
Five barrels on one wave !