Saturday, May 2, 2020

Earth Day 2020 NASA animations

GEOS-5 Modeled Cloud Cover, with labels
This visualization shows cloud cover as modeled by the GEOS-5 atmospheric model, using observations as its input, over the course of three days.
The time period repeats halfway through the animation.
Visualizers: Greg Shirah, Trent L. Schindler (lead)

The camera starts under water off the coast of the Eastern United States showing layers of ocean currents from a computational model called ECCO-2.
The camera slowly pulls back revealing the Gulf Stream, one of the most powerful ocean currents on Earth. The camera continues to pull back revealing NASA's Earth observing fleet.
Ocean currents from the ECCO-2 model: starting underwater, then pulling back to see the Gulf Stream, pulling back farther revealing the Earth observing fleet
Visualizers: Greg Shirah (lead), Horace Mitchell


This visualization shows sea surface temperature (SST) data of the oceans from January 2016 through March 2020.
The data set used is from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) Multi-scale Ultra-high Resolution (MUR) Sea Surface Temperature Analysis.
The ocean temperatures are displayed between 0 degrees celcius (C) and 32 degrees C.
Sea Surface Temperature - composited version with all layers included 
Visualizers: Greg Shirah (lead), Horace Mitchell

Links :
 

Friday, May 1, 2020

GeoCuba : 25th anniversary this Workers' Day

GEOCUBA Business Group celebrates this Workers' Day on the 25th anniversary of its constitution.

GEOCUBA Estudios Marinos, created in 1995 as part of the GEOCUBA Business Group, inherited a vast experience of more than forty years from the Cuban Institute of Hydrography.
Today the company has experienced professionals and technicians in specialties related to the marine environment.


GEOCUBA Estudios Marinos has as its business objective to research, design, execute and market its products and services in the activities of hydrography, oceanography, geology and geophysics, coastal engineering and hydrotechnical works projects, cartography and nautical publications, geoinformatics and spatial data infrastructures, consultancy and training, of maritime and port services, specialized diving, navigation aids and maritime signaling projects, environmental and conservation studies, vulnerability and risk mitigation studies, in addition to providing specialized scientific-technological services, consulting and training, related to the activities of its corporate purpose.


GEOCUBA Estudios Marinos belongs to different national and international professional and scientific organizations and societies.
It is a member of the Hydrographic and Geodesic Service of the Republic of Cuba, which in turn is a member of the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) and the Regional Hydrographic Commission of Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Sea (MACHC).

Links :

Fishpeople : Lives transformed by the sea

Fishpeople tells the stories of a unique cast of characters who have dedicated their lives to the sea. Featuring Dave Rastovich, Kimi Werner, Matahi Drollet and more.
Directed by Keith Malloy

Thursday, April 30, 2020

How a record-strong Arctic weather pattern aided a troubled Arctic research expedition

Hoarfrost covers the snow where researchers cross a lagoon in Utqiavik, AK on April 9, 2019.
(Bonnie Jo Mount/The Washington Post)

From Washington Post by Maddie Stone

Ship will rendezvous with resupply ships after being blown across the central Arctic Ocean

An unusually pronounced Arctic weather pattern that contributed to the East Coast’s mild winter, fueled a rare ozone hole over the North Pole and even helped turbocharge transatlantic flights is having another unexpected impact:
Helping keep a massive Arctic research expedition on course amidst a global pandemic.

On Friday, researchers announced a new contingency plan to keep the beleaguered Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Change (MOSAiC) expedition — billed as the largest Arctic research expedition in history — up and running after coronavirus-related travel restrictions forced it to suspend an April crew rotation.

In May, the expedition’s flagship research vessel, the R/V Polarstern, will temporarily leave its icebound perch in the central Arctic Ocean, where it has been drifting along with the sea ice since October, and rendezvous with two German research vessels off the north coast of Svalbard, Norway.
These ships will allow it to pick up additional supplies and conduct its third crew swap.

According to expedition leader Markus Rex, an atmospheric scientist at the Alfred Wegener Institute’s Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, the Polarstern is well-positioned to make this unanticipated detour in part because of weather associated with an unusually strong polar vortex this winter.

In recent months, fierce and persistent surface winds linked to this upper atmospheric phenomenon have helped push sea ice surrounding the Polarstern across the central Arctic Ocean at a rapid clip, moving from the Siberian Arctic to the Barents Sea.

“This weather pattern... is connected to a wind system in the Siberian Arctic that drives the ice in a very straight line and very quickly across the Arctic,” Rex said.
As a result, the Polarstern has made “good distance” and is now situated on the Atlantic side of the North Pole, “meaning the operation is possible,” Rex said.

While many other scientific research expeditions were canceled outright due to the coronavirus pandemic, the year-long MOSAiC expedition — which is studying the ocean, atmosphere, ice and ecosystems of the central Arctic — was already underway when covid-19 began.
As travel restrictions mounted, this massive research endeavor, involving 600 scientists and support staff tagging in and out for six distinct legs of the expedition, turned into a logistical nightmare.

First, a researcher who planned to participate in survey flights out of Svalbard in support of MOSAiC tested positive for coronavirus, causing these March flights to be temporarily suspended, and subsequently canceled.
Then, as the government of Norway closed its borders to outsiders, MOSAiC was forced to abandon plans to fly its third crew rotation of roughly 100 scientists and support staff to the Polarstern out of Svalbard in April.

Svalbard is an archipelago in the Norwegian Arctic and a hub of both research and, in better times, tourism.
The Arctic is warming at more than twice the rate of the rest of the globe, increasing access to this region.

The expedition has been searching for an alternative way to send that relief crew north ever since.
At first, it seemed like the team might be able to hitch a ride aboard the Swedish icebreaker Oden, which was already slated to rendezvous with, and resupply, the Polarstern in June.
Then, coronavirus-related restrictions in Sweden forced the Oden to cancel its resupply run.

After pursuing “at least a dozen different options,” MOSAiC finally landed on a new plan with the help of the German government.
The upcoming crew transfer and resupply will be accomplished simultaneously, with the aid of two German research vessels, the R/V Sonne and the R/V Maria S. Merian.

A positive Arctic Oscillation (left) is associated with a strong, stable polar vortex whereas a negative Arctic Oscillation (right) is associated with weak, unstable vortex.

These vessels are not icebreakers, so they will be meeting up with the Polarstern at the ice’s southern edge near Svalbard.
The staff exchange will take place toward the end of May, after the entire relief team has undergone a two-week quarantine and after everyone has been tested “several times” for covid-19, Rex said.

This contingency plan was made possible, at least in part, by several months of favorable winds that helped push the Polarstern to its current location near the northern edge of the Fram Strait separating Greenland and Svalbard.
According to Rex, the team owes the helpful weather to larger patterns in the atmosphere.

Throughout the winter, the polar vortex — an upper level low pressure center surrounded by a belt of west-to-east winds in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere — was exceptionally strong.
This high-altitude conveyor belt bottled up frigid air near the North Pole, creating the right conditions for a rare Arctic ozone hole to form.

Its effects also rippled down into the lower atmosphere, contributing to a record positive phase of the Arctic Oscillation, a pattern of air pressure at the Earth’s surface, in February.

When the Arctic Oscillation is in a positive state, a large, deep low pressure area typically develops over northern Siberia.
At its southern edge, the contrast between this low pressure zone and the higher pressure air masses surrounding it intensifies a fast flowing, west-to-east current of air known as the polar jet stream.
At the northern edge of the low pressure system, meanwhile, strong east-to-west winds develop, helping to blow sea ice — and any ice bound ships — from the Siberian Arctic across the central Arctic Ocean and into the Barents Sea north of Russia.

According to Rex, while the MOSAiC team expected their ship to drift about 4.3 miles (7 kilometers) per day, it’s been moving closer to 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) per day in recent months.
Sea ice drift has also become “more systematic,” Rex said, causing the ship to travel in a fairly straight line.
Both of these trends can be tied back to the exceptional atmospheric conditions, Rex said.

“This winter has been a perfect case study in how these really anomalously strong vortex conditions in the stratosphere have implications for the way weather evolves in the troposphere, especially in high latitudes,” said Andrea Lang, an associate professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Albany who is not involved in MOSAic.

The Polarstern will have to take a roughly three week break from its scientific mission in order to link up with the relief vessels, swap its crew, and return to the central Arctic Ocean.
Rex said that while every day of missing data is disappointing, “ a three week gap is something we can live with,” especially considering the alternative might have been abandoning the mission entirely.

Links : 

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Social distancing and the navigation rules


From David Burch Navigation blog

These sad times have introduced a new terminology to the public called "social distancing," but this is not a new concept to mariners familiar with the Navigation Rules.
We call it "close-quarters."
Its goal is precisely the same vessel-to-vessel as it is person-to-person: to prevent harm by not getting too close to each other.

The definition is the same in both applications.
We want to define a space around us within which our own safety is under our own control.
If we let the other get closer, vessel or human, we are not protected against a sudden, unexpected maneuver of the other.
Our close quarters or social distance is our safety zone wherein  we can control our fate with our own maneuver and not be dependent on the other vessel or human.


The Navigation Rules effectively instructs us not to let any approaching vessel into our close quarters.
The term appears explicitly in Rule 8, Action to Avoid a Collision, and in Rule 19, Conduct of Vessels in Restricted Visibility, but it is also implied in Rule 17, Action of the Stand-on Vessel that instructs us to maneuver if the other vessel is "not taking appropriate action," which means, among other things, is getting so close we could not avoid a collision by our own maneuver.

The dimensions and shape of close quarters amongst vessels is not defined in the Navigation Rules but has been addressed in numerous court cases.
Going slow in a narrow channel, it could be yards; at high speeds in the open ocean, it is more often thought of in miles. And it depends on the vessels involved.
It is the knowledge and prudence of the skipper to determine the extent of their own close quarters in various circumstances.

The size of the social distancing range is clearly oversimplified in the government specified distance of 6 ft, which, even worse, is sometimes specified as 3 ft—close enough that someone could spit on you and grab your phone.

Six feet is likely chosen because it is easy to think of.
We can picture 6 ft; it is a nice round number—half a dozen.
But you can smell someone's perfume at 6 ft off, which quite literally means molecules coming off of their body have entered your body.
But these social matters are more complex that vessel traffic.
It all depends on what you want to protect against.
Dr Anthony Fauci demonstrated in  a TV interview what a 24-ft sneeze looks like... and it did not seem so unusual at all.
The social distance for a shady character on a dark street is going to be larger than 6 ft.

But my point for now is simply that these are the same concepts, and it might on some occasions help to keep that in mind.

Here is how this term appears in the Rules... with colored text added


Action to Avoid a Collision, Rule 8 (c).
If there is sufficient sea room, alteration of course alone may be the most effective action to avoid a close-quarters situation provided that it is made in good time, is substantial and does not result in another close-quarters situation.

and


Conduct of Vessels in Restricted VisibilityRule 19 (d).
A vessel which detects by radar alone the presence of another vessel shall determine if a close-quarters situation is developing and/or risk of collision exists.
If so, she shall take avoiding action in ample time, provided that when such action consists of an alteration in course, so far as possible the following shall be avoided:
     
      (i) An alteration of course to port for a vessel forward of the beam, other than for a vessel being               overtaken;


      (ii) An alteration of course toward a vessel abeam or abaft the beam.


Rule 19 (e).
Except where it has been determined that a risk of collision does not exist, every vessel which hears apparently forward of her beam the fog signal of another vessel, or which cannot avoid a close-quarters situation with another vessel forward of her beam, shall reduce her speed to be the minimum at which she can be kept on her course.
She shall if necessary take all her way off and in any event navigate with extreme caution until danger of collision is over.


Action by Stand-on Vessel,  Rule 17 (a) (i)
Where one of two vessels is to keep out of the way, the other shall keep her course and speed. (ii)
The latter vessel may, however, take action to avoid collision by her maneuver alone, as soon as it becomes apparent to her that the vessel required to keep out of the way is not taking appropriate action in compliance with these Rules.

...one of which is avoiding close quarters.

Note that Rule 19d is a much stronger rule than others in this regard.
Action to avoid a collision and related rules in clear weather refer to actions that "avoid close quarters," whereas Rule 19d in restricted visibility instruct us to maneuver to prevent the development of close quarters.
This calls for earlier maneuvers.

Links :