Friday, March 6, 2020

Microbes point the way to shipwrecks

Marine organisms colonizing the bow of a yacht called Anona, which sank in the Gulf of Mexico in 1944.
Credit : Deep Sea Systems International's Global Explorer ROV and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

From NYTimes by Katherine Kornei

Distinct microbiomes flourish around sunken ships as they become artificial reefs, new research in the Gulf of Mexico reveals.


Off the coast of Mississippi, under 4,000 feet of water, a luxury yacht is slowly disintegrating.
Marine creatures dart, cling and scuttle near the hull of the wreck, which has been lying undisturbed for 75 years.

But there’s more than meets the eye when it comes to this shipwreck and others, researchers have now shown — distinct assemblages of microbes inhabit the seafloor surrounding these structures, helping to turn shipwreck sites into artificial reefs rich in life.

Shipwrecks are trespassers on the bottom of the ocean, human-made structures decidedly out of their element.
But a wreck’s intrusion gradually becomes welcome as various forms of marine life seek refuge among the steel and wood.

The macroscopic animals that inhabit shipwrecks are only there thanks to much smaller forms of life, said Leila Hamdan, a marine microbial ecologist at the University of Southern Mississippi.

That’s because microbes like bacteria and archaea coat surfaces in a sticky layer, a biofilm, that functions as a chemical and physical come-hither call for larger creatures such as barnacles and coral, Dr. Hamdan said.
“A shipwreck can never become an artificial reef unless the microorganisms are there first.”

Her team is researching how the presence of a shipwreck affects microbial communities.
This field of research, shipwreck microbial ecology, is a niche area of study that spans archaeology, biology, ecology and marine science, she said.
“As far as we know, we’re the only ones doing it right now.”

In September 2018, Dr. Hamdan and her colleagues departed from Gulfport, Miss., aboard the research vessel Point Sur.
Roughly 70 miles off the coast, the team lowered a remotely operated vehicle called Odysseus into the 80-degree water.
Within 45 minutes, Odysseus’ seven thrusters had propelled it to the seafloor.
There, it began emitting sonar pings to locate Anona, a shipwreck first discovered in the 1990s that the team knew was nearby.

Built for a Detroit industrialist in 1904, Anona was a 117-foot long yacht, with a steel hull.
A research team has been exploring the microbes and organisms that now inhabit Anona’s remains on the seafloor, where the shipwreck was discovered in the 1990s.
Credit...Bowling Green State University

The 117-foot yacht, built in the early 20th century for a Detroit industrialist, was once sumptuously appointed in mahogany and teak, with a social hall that featured a piano.
It sank in 1944, when the steel plates beneath its engines buckled during a voyage to the British West Indies.
(The structural failure sent the crew of nine scrambling into a raft, and they drifted for two days before being rescued.) Anona fell to the seafloor upright and intact, its bow pointing toward Cuba.

Dr. Hamdan and her colleagues directed Odysseus around the shipwreck.
The remotely operated vehicle, about the size of a small car, carried a payload of clear plastic tubes.
At predetermined distances from the shipwreck — ranging from about 300 to seven feet — one of the vehicle’s robotic arms plunged a tube the size of a water bottle into the fine gray sediment of the seafloor.
The team collected cores off the yacht’s bow, starboard side and port side.
(On previous research cruises, the team had collected cores as far away as 3,300 feet, including ones off Anona’s stern.)

In June and July of last year, the team conducted similar fieldwork at two other shipwreck sites that they discovered in the Gulf of Mexico.
Based on the shapes of the wooden sailing vessels and the artifacts found nearby, the ships were most likely built in the 19th century.
Like Anona, both vessels were upright and intact.
One rested in relatively shallow water, about 1,700 feet, and the other lay beneath more than 5,900 feet of water.

Back in the laboratory, the team extracted microbial DNA from the cores and sequenced the genetic material.
“We look both at who is present and what their abundance is,” Dr. Hamdan said.

The researchers found the largest diversity of microbes — several hundred types — roughly 160 to 330 feet away from Anona.
That makes sense based on the age of the shipwreck, Dr.
Hamdan said, since the structure is providing resources to microbes.
“Those resources begin to spread over time, and with the resource follows the microbes.”

The team also discovered that the seafloor’s microbiome varied with distance from Anona.
That’s something that had not been demonstrated before, Dr.
Hamdan said.
“A shipwreck sitting on the deep ocean floor is materially changing the biodiversity of the seabed.”

An anchor and some ceramic dishes were among the artifacts near the hull of a shipwreck.
Credit...Pelagic Research Service’s Odysseus ROV and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Near the wooden sailing vessels, the scientists found bacteria that degrade cellulose and hemicellulose, some of the primary components of wood.
“That gives us an idea that maybe they’re feeding on the shipwreck,” said Justyna Hampel, a biogeochemist at the University of Southern Mississippi who led the analysis of the two new shipwreck sites.

Because there is no light and only limited sources of energy in deep water, survival “defies the normal routes of life,” Dr. Hampel said.

The microbiomes of the two newly discovered shipwrecks are also distinct from each other, the team showed, which raises the question of whether water depth plays a role in dictating microbial communities.

It’s unknown whether these microbes were transported to the seafloor or they were there all along and conditions simply became conducive to their flourishing after a ship sank.
“That’s the million-dollar question in microbial ecology,” Dr. Hamdan said.

In support of the second idea, there’s a theory that “everything is everywhere, but the environment selects,” she added.
As an example, it’s entirely possible that an individual spore of bubonic plague is sitting on my desk right now, she said.
“It’s just there, waiting for the right conditions.” Similarly, shipwrecks create a new environment that is hospitable to some microbes but inhospitable to others, she said.

Dr. Hamdan’s students are doing experiments on the seafloor to investigate where the microbes came from, and where they go when they leave shipwrecks.

These results were presented this week at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Diego.

Magnificent ecosystems exist around shipwrecks, said Andrew Davies, a marine biologist at the University of Rhode Island who was not involved in the research.
But it’s been largely unknown how these artificial structures affect the surrounding seafloor, he said, so it’s good to see studies like this that are focused on “habitats of opportunity.”

In the future, Dr. Hamdan and her colleagues plan to study microbial communities around other shipwrecks.
There are plenty of possibilities — more than 2,000 shipwrecks in the Gulf of Mexico, she said.
“We absolutely need to go to more sites.”

Thursday, March 5, 2020

Norway (NHS) layer update in the GeoGarage platform

110 nautical raster charts updated

The world may lose half its sandy beaches by 2100. It’s not too late to save most of them


From The Conversation by John Church

For many coastal regions, sea-level rise is a looming crisis threatening our coastal society, livelihoods and coastal ecosystems.
A new study, published in Nature Climate Change, has reported the world will lose almost half of its valuable sandy beaches by 2100 as the ocean moves landward with rising sea levels.

Sandy beaches comprise about a third of the world’s coastline.
And Australia, with nearly 12,000 kilometres at risk, could be hit hard.

This is the first truly global study to attempt to quantify beach erosion.
The results for the highest greenhouse gas emission scenario are alarming, but reducing emissions leads to lower rates of coastal erosion.

Our best hope for the future of the world’s coastlines and for Australia’s iconic beaches is to keep global warming as low as possible by urgently reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Losing sand in coastal erosion

Two of the largest problems resulting from rising sea levels are coastal erosion and an already-observed increase in the frequency of coastal flooding events.

Erosion during storms can have dramatic consequences, particularly for coastal infrastructure.
We saw this in 2016, when wild storms removed sand from beaches and damaged houses in Sydney.

A swimming pool washed away from a beachside property after wild storms in Sydney in 2016.
AAP Image/David Moir

After storms like this, beaches often gradually recover, because sand from deeper waters washes back to the shore over months to years, and in some cases, decades.
These dramatic storms and the long-term sand supply make it difficult to identify any beach movement in the recent past from sea-level rise.

What we do know is that the rate of sea-level rise has accelerated.
It has increased by half since 1993, and is continuing to accelerate from ongoing greenhouse gas emissions.

If we continue to emit high levels of greenhouse gases, this acceleration will continue through the 21st century and beyond.
As a result, the supply of sand may not keep pace with rapidly rising sea levels.

Projections for the worst-case scenario

In the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, released last year, the highest greenhouse gas emissions scenario resulted in global warming of more than 4°C (relative to pre-industrial temperatures) and a likely range of sea-level rise between 0.6 and 1.1 metres by 2100.

For this scenario, this new study projects a global average landward movement of the coastline in the range of 40 to 250 metres if there were no physical limits to shoreline movement, such as those imposed by sea walls or other coastal infrastructure.

Sea-level rise is responsible for the vast majority of this beach loss, with faster loss during the latter decades of the 21st century when the rate of rise is larger.
And sea levels will continue to rise for centuries, so beach erosion would continue well after 2100.

For southern Australia, the landward movement of the shoreline is projected to be more than 100 metres.
This would damage many of Australia’s iconic tourist beaches such as Bondi, Manly and the Gold Coast.
The movement in northern Australia is projected to be even larger, but more uncertain because of ongoing historical shoreline trends.

What happens if we mitigate our emissions

The above results are from a worst-case scenario.
If greenhouse gas emissions were reduced such that the 2100 global temperature rose by about 2.5°C, instead of more than 4°C, then we’d reduce beach erosion by about a third of what’s projected in this worst-case scenario.

Current global policies would result in about 3°C of global warming.
That’s between the 4°C and the 2.5°C scenarios considered in this beach erosion study, implying our current policies will lead to significant beach erosion, including in Australia.

Mitigating our emissions even further, to achieve the Paris goal of keeping temperature rise to well below 2°C, would be a major step in reducing beach loss.

Why coastal erosion is hard to predict

Projecting sea-level rise and resulting beach erosion are particularly difficult, as both depend on many factors.

For sea level, the major problems are estimating the contribution of melting Antarctic ice flowing into the ocean, how sea level will change on a regional scale, and the amount of global warming.

The beach erosion calculated in this new study depends on several new databases.
The databases of recent shoreline movement used to project ongoing natural factors might already be influenced by rising sea levels, possibly leading to an overestimate in the final calculations.

The implications

Regardless of the exact numbers reported in this study, it’s clear we will have to adapt to the beach erosion we can no longer prevent, if we are to continue enjoying our beaches.

This means we need appropriate planning, such as beach nourishment (adding sand to beaches to combat erosion) and other soft and hard engineering solutions.
In some cases, we’ll even need to retreat from the coast to allow the beach to migrate landward.

And if we are to continue to enjoy our sandy beaches into the future, we cannot allow ongoing and increasing greenhouse gas emissions.
The world needs urgent, significant and sustained global mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.

Links :

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

How 'dark fishing' sails below the radar to plunder the oceans


It is estimated one in five fish brought to markets is illegally caught, often by a so-called “dark” fishing fleet.
This refers to vessels that switch off their satellite tracking to hide their activities in far-flung parts of the world’s oceans.
Now a Greenpeace investigation has uncovered the scale of the problem and the need for greater ocean protection.

From Al'Jazeera by Nick Clark

Billions of dollars in illegal and unregulated fish supplies are mixed with legal catches and smuggled into the market.

In September last year, the Greenpeace campaign ship Arctic Sunrise was scanning the mid-Atlantic ocean, thousands of kilometres from anywhere.
On board, investigators were looking for vessels that were doing their best not to be found.

One of them was Taiwanese fishing boat, the Hung Hwa - a longliner capable of running baited lines more than 100 kilometres (62 miles) in length, targeting mainly tuna species.
It had turned off its satellite locator, the Automatic Identification System (AIS).

It had "gone dark".

A fishing vessel might do that to avoid competition from other boats or to prevent attack by pirates.
But often it coincides with a transhipment at sea - the offloading of a fishing boat's catch onto what is known as a reefer, or a giant refrigerated cargo ship.
The transhipment loophole

Transhipping is the lifeblood of the distant water fishing industry.
It allows fishing boats to stay at sea without returning to port for months because they can offload their catch on to what are effectively colossal floating freezers.

As part of the process, the fishing vessels are refuelled and resupplied by the reefers, allowing them to get straight back to doing what they do - catching fish relentlessly.

The problem is that transhipping fish mid-ocean presents a major loophole in monitoring fishing activities.

By offloading at sea, vessels are able to smuggle illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) catches into the market by mixing them with legal catches.

This makes it exceedingly difficult to detect fraud or trace a shipment back to the vessel that caught it.
It also allows entire fleets to operate out of sight, where they can hide illegal catches and operate without returning to port.

Under the radar

On the bridge of the Arctic Sunrise, the Greenpeace investigators were scrutinising the navigation screens, following the satellite tracks of vessels in their sector of the ocean.
Their suspicions were raised when a Taiwan-owned, Panama-registered reefer vessel called the Hsiang Hao, appeared to be sailing slowly in a loitering pattern - effectively circling for several hours.

There was no other vessel present, at least none displaying AIS.

But the next day the Arctic Sunrise intercepted the Hsiang Hao and there, alongside, was the Hung Hwa, still "dark" - not transmitting its satellite location.

And from the Hung Hwa's hold, dozens upon dozens of deep-frozen tuna and shark - frosted and steaming in the humid equatorial air - were being hoisted on to the reefer ship.

Greenpeace’s lead investigator, Sophie Cooke, said there are many reasons vessels may not want to appear on satellite.

"Some of them might be legitimate," she said.
"But a lot of the time, it's because they want to avoid detection or want to go into areas they are not allowed.
Or they want to meet up with another vessel at sea and do not want to be seen."

"If ships turn off their satellite tracking it means no one sees what's happening out at sea and it makes the high seas a black hole of fishing activity," Cooke added.

Second mate Helena De Carlos Watts and lead investigator, Sophie Cooke, right, watch the radar screen as the Arctic Sunrise approaches a target vessel in the southern Atlantic ocean [Tommy Trenchard/Greenpeace]

The Investigation

In 2017, Greenpeace set out to understand the scale and misuse of AIS by the global reefer industry.
They investigated the movements, behaviour and owner structures of more than 400 reefers identified as being capable of taking part in transhipments at sea.

In the resulting report just published, the investigating team said what was most striking was how much transhipment is happening between fishing vessels that have gone dark because of their involvement in illegal fishing.

"It’s very hard to know the exact amount of IUU fishing activity that’s going on," said Will McCallum, Greenpeace's head of oceans, "but what we do know is that transhipment allows vessels to stay far out at sea where they are out of scrutiny, out of mind and out of sight."

McCallum said they can track exactly where the global fleet of refrigerated cargo vessels is operating.

"For example, we can see they're in the southwest Atlantic, which is a part of the world where there is very little, to the point of almost no fisheries management for a lot of fishing vessels," he said.

'Flags of convenience'

The Greenpeace report highlights how the global fleet of reefers hides behind complex ownership structures and "flags of convenience" that reduce accountability and transparency.

The single most active fleet of reefers involved in transhipments on the high seas is owned by the Greek shipping magnate Thanasis Laskaridis, whose vessels ply the seas the world over, from the North Atlantic to the South Pacific.

Investigators also discovered that because transhipment allows fishing boats to spend months or even years at sea without returning to port, it leaves crews open to abuse.
Being so far from scrutiny and the prying eyes of port inspectors for so long raises the possibility that boat owners can effectively enslave their crew.

Many cases have been documented, the report said, of fishermen being forced to work exhausting shifts in unsafe conditions, having their pay withheld and documents confiscated.
There are even reports of crew being denied access to clean food and drinking water.

The Arctic Sunrise [Tommy Trenchard/Greenpeace] 

Closing gaps in ocean governance

McCallum said the investigation demonstrates the urgent need for greater scrutiny.

"Reefers should have observers on board to track where the catch is coming from and make sure we are not muddying the global supply chains." The ultimate goal would be for transhipment at sea to be phased out.

There is no question of the severity of the grave assault that is taking place on our oceans and everything that lives in it.
Overfishing is wreaking havoc on marine life while threatening the food security and livelihoods of billions of people.

This year will be a significant one for the world - from the crucial climate conference in Glasgow in November to a landmark biodiversity summit in October in China.
But, for the Greenpeace oceans team, all eyes right now are on New York in March when maximum effort is being focused on the implementation of a global ocean treaty at a vital UN conference.

"We need a strong ocean treaty," said McCallum.
"We need a single holistic way to manage these international waters, that are so far from land they’re very hard for a single country or group of countries to monitor and regulate.
So a global ocean treaty would plug some of the governance gaps that we are seeing at the moment."

The goal is to ensure 30 percent of the world’s oceans become off-limits to any kind of exploitation - from fishing to deep-sea mining.
And that way those far-flung waters that are often home to pristine ecosystems, would be better protected from the fleet that goes dark to pursue and dispatch its catch.

Links :

Tuesday, March 3, 2020

Introducing Tidal : Fishial recognition tech


 Google’s parent company Alphabet has today launched a new initiative called Tidal aimed at changing that, with an overarching objective to use a better understanding of the ocean to better protect the marine environment.
A moonshot to protect the ocean and feed humanity sustainably

From Blog X by Neil Davé

One of the biggest barriers to protecting the ocean — and our future — is that we don’t know much about what’s going on under the water.
Even though it covers around 70% of the planet, most of it remains unexplored.
We know more about the surface of the moon than we do about the deepest parts of the ocean floor.
This is partially because it’s an incredibly challenging environment for technology.
The pressure is crushing, communication is extremely difficult (GPS and WiFi don’t work underwater!), and saltwater kills electronics, which makes long-term monitoring challenging.

This is a critical issue: humanity is pushing the ocean past its breaking point, but we can’t protect what we don’t understand.
Pollution and unsustainable fishing practices mean that there will soon be more plastic than fish in the sea, while rapid acidification is killing corals and sea creatures.
This is driving upheaval in ecosystems all over the world, from coral reefs to the Arctic, leading to chain reactions of damage that are threatening human food and economic security.

That’s why today we’re announcing Tidal: a team at X working on a moonshot to protect the ocean and preserve its ability to support life and help feed humanity, sustainably.
Our initial area of focus is on developing technologies that bring greater visibility and understanding of what’s happening under the water.

We decided to start working on a small corner of this problem: exploring new tools that could provide useful information to fish farmers looking for environmentally friendly ways to run and grow their operations.
Fish have a low carbon footprint relative to other sources of animal protein and they play a critical role in feeding 3 billion people today, so helping fish farmers could prove critical both for humanity and for the health of the ocean.

Getting our feet wet

Over the last three years we’ve consulted with fish farmers around the globe and learned how eager they are to minimize food waste, catch diseases earlier, and reduce their use of chemicals.
Today, the health and welfare decisions for thousands of fish are based on observing a few individual fish that are taken out of the water and manually inspected — a data-gathering process that’s time-consuming, unreliable and impossible to scale.
We thought we could help.

Research and development north of the Arctic Circle
The idea is that observing the fish and their behaviors in this kind of unprecedented detail, can help farmers manage their pens in more efficient ways, through the smarter use of fish food, for example. 

After spending lots of time out on the water, we’ve developed an underwater camera system and a set of machine perception tools that can detect and interpret fish behaviors not visible to the human eye.
Our software can track and monitor thousands of individual fish over time, observe and log fish behaviors like eating, and collect environmental information like temperature and oxygen levels.
This kind of information gives farmers the ability to track the health of their fish and make smarter decisions about how to manage the pens — like how much food to put in the pens, which we hope can help reduce both costs and pollution.

Fish farming as a diving off point

Earth is a unique planet — because it’s the blue planet.
We must work harder to protect it, and that’s what motivates the Tidal team.
The ocean provides food and livelihoods for billions of people as well as every second breath we take.
A natural carbon sink, it’s the planet’s air filter, temperature regulator and food basket rolled into one.

While we started developing our technology with fish farmers, this is just one area in which we hope to help.
As we validate our technology and learn more about the ocean environment, we plan to apply what we’ve learned to other fields and problems, with the help of ocean health experts and other organizations eager to find new solutions to protect and preserve this precious resource.
If Tidal’s mission sounds like something you’d like to be part of, please get in touch.

Links :