Tuesday, April 23, 2019

These ocean floats can hear earthquakes, revealing mysterious structures deep inside Earth

A MERMAID undergoes testing off Japan's coast in 2018
photo : Alex Burky / Princeton University

From ScienceMag by Erik Stokstad


A versatile, low-cost way to study Earth's interior from sea has yielded its first images and is scaling up.
By deploying hydrophones inside neutrally buoyant floats that drift through the deep ocean, seismologists are detecting earthquakes that occur below the sea floor and using the signals to peer inside Earth in places where data have been lacking.

In February, researchers reported that nine of these floats near Ecuador's Galápagos Islands had helped trace a mantle plume—a column of hot rock rising from deep below the islands.
Now, 18 floats searching for plumes under Tahiti have also recorded earthquakes, the team reported last week at the European Geosciences Union (EGU) meeting here.
"It seems they've made a lot of progress," says Barbara Romanowicz, a geophysicist at the University of California, Berkeley.


A MERMAID recently launched near Tahiti is sending messages to the satellite before diving a mile underwater to begin monitoring for earthquake signals.
Photo by Frederik Simons, Department of Geosciences

The South Pacific fleet will grow this summer, says Frederik Simons, a seismologist at Princeton University who helped develop the floats, called MERMAIDs (mobile earthquake recorders in marine areas by independent divers).
He envisions a global flotilla of thousands of these wandering devices, which could also be used to detect the sound of rain or whales, or outfitted with other environmental or biological sensors.
"The goal is to instrument all the oceans."

Drifting a mile below the surface, MERMAIDs cover a large area. The red circles show where a MERMAID picked up a seismic signal.
Image courtesy of the researchers

For decades, geologists have placed seismometers on land to study how powerful, faraway earthquakes pass through Earth.
Deep structures of different density, such as the cold slabs of ocean crust that sink into the mantle along subduction zones, can speed up or slow down seismic waves.
By combining seismic information detected in various locations, researchers can map those structures, much like 3D x-ray scans of the human body.
Upwelling plumes and other giant structures under the oceans are more mysterious, however.
The reason is simple: There are far fewer seismometers on the ocean floor.

Such instruments are expensive because they must be deployed and retrieved by research vessels.
And sometimes they fail to surface after yearlong campaigns.
More recently, scientists have begun to use fiber optic communication cables on the sea floor to detect quakes, but the approach is in its infancy.

MERMAIDs are a cheap alternative.
They drift at a depth of about 1500 meters, which minimizes background noise and lessens the energy needed for periodic ascents to transmit fresh data.
Whenever a MERMAID's hydrophone picks up a strong sound pulse, its computer evaluates whether that pressure wave likely originated from seafloor shaking.
If so, the MERMAID surfaces within a few hours and sends the seismogram via satellite.

The nine floats released near the Galápagos in 2014 gathered 719 seismograms in 2 years before their batteries ran out.
Background noise, such as wind and rain at the ocean surface, drowned out some of the seismograms.
But 80% were helpful in imaging a mantle plume some 300 kilometers wide and 1900 kilometers deep, the team described in February in Scientific Reports.
The widely dispersed MERMAIDs sharpened the picture, compared with studies done with seismometers on the islands and in South America.
"The paper demonstrates the potential of the methodology, but I think they need to figure out how to beat down the noise a little more," Romanowicz says.


This animation shows every recorded earthquake in sequence as they occurred from January 1, 1901, through December 31, 2000, at a rate of 1 year per second.
The earthquake hypocenters first appear as flashes then remain as colored circles before shrinking with time so as not to obscure subsequent earthquakes.
The size of the circle represents the earthquake magnitude while the color represents its depth within the earth.
At the end of the animation it will first show all quakes in this 100-year period.
Next, it will show only those earthquakes greater than magnitude 6.5, the smallest earthquake size known to make a tsunami.
It will then show only those earthquakes with magnitudes of 8.0 or larger, the “great” earthquakes most likely to pose a tsunami threat when they occur under the ocean or near a coastline and when they are shallow within the earth (less than 100 km or 60 mi. deep).
The animation concludes by showing the plate boundary faults responsible for the majority of all of these earthquakes.
The era of modern earthquake seismology—the scientific study of earthquakes—began in the 20th Century with the invention of the seismometer and its deployment in instrument networks to record and measure earthquakes as they occur.
Therefore, when the animation begins only the largest earthquakes appear as they were the only ones that could be detected at great distances with the few available instruments available at the time.
But as time progresses, more and more seismometers were deployed and smaller and smaller earthquakes could be recorded.
For example, note how in the 1930’s many small earthquakes suddenly seem to appear in California, but this illusion results from the installation of more and more instruments in that region.
Likewise, there appears to be a jump in the number of earthquakes globally in the 1970’s when seismology took another leap forward with advances in telecommunications and signal processing with digital computers, a trend that continues today.
20th Century seismology revealed the global geographic distribution of earthquakes and helped to solidify the Theory of Plate Tectonics.
Notice how earthquake epicenters do not occur randomly in space but form patterns over the earth’s surface, revealing the boundaries between tectonic plates as shown toward the end of this animation.
This time period also includes some remarkable events, including those that generated devastating tsunamis:
8.8 — Ecuador — 31January 1906 8.4 — Kamchatka, Russia — 3 February 1923 8.4 — Sanriku, Japan — 2 March 1933 8.6 — Unimak Island, Aleutian Islands — 1 April 1946 9.0 — Kamchatka, Russia — 4 November 1952 8.6 — Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands — 9 March 1957 9.5 — Valdivia, Chile — 22 May 1960 9.2 — Prince William Sound, Alaska — 28 March 1964 8.7 — Rat Islands, Aleutian Islands — 4 February 1965
These earthquakes represent some of the largest ever recorded.
Note how they all occur at a particular type of plate boundary, subduction zones where tectonic plates collide, so these are the regions where we expect future devastating tsunamis to be generated.
 
This animated map created from the NOAA, NWS, and PTWC shows every recorded earthquake in chronological order from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2015.
The size of the circle shows the magnitude of the earthquakes in relation to each other.
The color represents the earthquake depth.

Since that campaign, the MERMAID design was reworked by research engineer Yann Hello of Geoazur, a geoscience lab in Sophia Antipolis, France.
He made them spherical and stronger, and tripled battery life.
The floats now cost about $40,000, plus about $50 per month to transmit data.
"The MERMAIDs are filling a need for a fairly inexpensive, flexible device" to monitor the oceans, says Martin Mai, a geophysicist at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.

Between June and September of 2018, 18 of these new MERMAIDs were scattered around Tahiti to explore the Pacific Superswell, an expanse of oddly elevated ocean crust, likely inflated by plumes.
The plan is to illuminate this plumbing and find out whether multiple plumes stem from a single deep source.
"It's a pretty natural target," says Catherine Rychert, a seismologist at the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom.
"You'd need a lot of ocean bottom seismometers, a lot of ships, so having floats out there makes sense."

So far, the MERMAIDs have identified 258 earthquakes, Joel Simon, a graduate student at Princeton, told the EGU meeting.
About 90% of those have also been detected by other seismometers around the world—an indication that the hydrophones are detecting informative earthquakes.
Simon has also identified some shear waves, or S-waves, which arrive after the initial pressure waves of a quake and can provide clues to the mantle's composition and temperature.
"We never set out to get S-waves," he said.
"This is incredible." S-waves can't travel through water, so they are converted to pressure waves at the sea floor, which saps their energy and makes them hard to identify.

In August, 28 more MERMAIDS will join the South Pacific fleet, two dozen of them bought by the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China.
Heiner Igel, a geophysicist at Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, Germany, cheers the expansion.
"I would say drop them all over the oceans," he says.

Links :

Monday, April 22, 2019

Sous l'eau

Sous l'eau from Petole Films by Olivier Sautet
is visual poem filmed all around the underwater world.
Location : Hawaii, Madagascar, France, Mauritius, Tahiti.
Music : Bach, Busoni - Chaconne D minor

Sunday, April 21, 2019

How Leonardo da Vinci made a “satellite” map in 1502


It was accurate — and incredibly imaginative.
How do you create a “satellite” map in 1502?
As the video above shows, it takes a lot of technical expertise and imagination.
Fortunately, that was Leonardo da Vinci’s expertise.
When Leonardo was installed at Imola, Italy, as politician Cesare Borgia’s military engineer, he was charged with helping Borgia become more aware of the town’s layout.
To do it, he made a groundbreaking map that combined cutting-edge surveying techniques with his artistic imagination.
The resulting “ichnographic” map was a step forward for cartography, transforming it from a partly imaginative exercise to an informational asset.
Check out the video above to see how he did it.
-From Vox by Phil Edwards-

It was a feat of technological and symbolic imagination.
And it was pretty accurate, too.
Leonardo da Vinci’s known for his art and inventions — but also his groundbreaking maps, like this one of Imola, Italy.


Drafting 1502’s equivalent to a “satellite” map was a massive undertaking, and Leonardo managed to pull it off.
His early map helped Italian politcian Cesare Borgia construct an idea of the town of Imola that was far more accurate than most contemporary maps.
Through the use of careful measurements of angles and pacing out distances using a primitive odometer, Leonardo managed to create a map that was very close to accurate.
This map — an “ichnographic” map — was a step forward in portraying how maps could work to represent geography.
Though it’s marked with some inaccuracies, it’s stunningly precise for the time and pushed forward the art of mapmaking.
Leonardo’s Imola remains, even today, a remarkably useful guide to the city.

Links :

Saturday, April 20, 2019

Explore 400 years of maps in Google Earth and in Google Maps


David Rumsey began collecting maps back in 1980, and since then has amassed more than 150,000 maps spanning from the 16th to the 21st century. Nearly 90,000 of those maps have been carefully digitized and made available online, making it easier for students, researchers and enthusiasts around the world to experience the history of the world in maps.
Finally, get a look behind the scenes at the David Rumsey Map Center at Stanford University.

From Medium by Kristian Appenbrink 

Today we’re bringing back a layer that has long been a favorite of ours on Google Earth — the Historical Map Collection from David Rumsey.
Long-time users might recognize some of these maps from a previous collection, but they’ve never been easier to explore on the web or on your phone or tablet.

View a collection of these maps in Google Earth: https://g.co/earth/rumseymaps

David Rumsey has been collecting maps for nearly 40 years, and in that time, he has amassed more than 150,000 maps. He hand selected this collection specifically for Google Earth.
Each of the 100 plus maps has been georeferenced so you can easily compare the historic interpretation of the world with the world as it is today.

I especially love the early maps that include detailed illustrations and map things beyond the known world, like this Celestial Globe from 1792.


So take a few minutes to explore today, and see just how much the world and our perception of it has changed in the past 400 years.
Not only can maps show us where we are going, but they can help us to better understand where we’ve been.

You can also use the mashup created and hosted by the GeoGarage platform :


Links :

Friday, April 19, 2019

There’s no ‘garbage patch’ in the Southern Indian Ocean, so where does all the rubbish go

Plastic waste on a remote beach in Sri Lanka.
Author provided

From The Conversation by Mirjam van der Mheen / Charitha Pattiaratchi / Erik van Sebille

Great areas of our rubbish are known to form in parts of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.
But no such “garbage patch” has been found in the Southern Indian Ocean.

Our research – published recently in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans – looked at why that’s the case, and what happens to the rubbish that gets dumped in this particular area.

Every year, up to 15 million tonnes of plastic waste is estimated to make its way into the ocean through coastlines (about 12.5 million tonnes) and rivers (about 2.5 million tonnes).
This amount is expected to double by 2025.

Some of this waste sinks in the ocean, some is washed up on beaches, and some floats on the ocean surface, transported by currents.

The garbage patches

As plastic materials are extremely durable, floating plastic waste can travel great distances in the ocean.
Some floating plastics collect in the centre of subtropical circulating currents known as gyres, between 20 to 40 degrees north and south, to create these garbage patches.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

Here, the ocean currents converge at the centre of the gyre and sink.
But the floating plastic material remains at the surface, allowing it to concentrate in these regions.

The best known of these garbage patches is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which contains about 80,000 tonnes of plastic waste.
As the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration points out, the “patches” are not actually clumped collections of easy-to-see debris, but concentrations of litter (mostly small pieces of floating plastic).

Similar, but smaller, patches exist in the North and South Atlantic Oceans and the South Pacific Ocean.
In total, it is estimated that only 1% of all plastic waste that enters the ocean is trapped in the garbage patches.
It is still a mystery what happens to the remaining 99% of plastic waste that has entered the ocean.

Rubbish in the Indian Ocean

Even less is known about what happens to plastic in the Indian Ocean, although it receives the largest input of plastic material globally.

For example, it has been estimated that up to 90% of the global riverine input of plastic waste originates from Asia.
The input of plastics to the Southern Indian Ocean is mainly through Indonesia.
The Australian contribution is small.

The major sources of riverine input of plastic material into the Indian Ocean.

The Indian Ocean has many unique characteristics compared with the other ocean basins.
The most striking factor is the presence of the Asian continental landmass, which results in the absence of a northern ocean basin and generates monsoon winds.

As a result of the former, there is no gyre in the Northern Indian Ocean, and so there is no garbage patch.
The latter results in reversing ocean surface currents.

The Indian and Pacific Oceans are connected through the Indonesian Archipelago, which allows for warmer, less salty water to be transported from the Pacific to the Indian via a phenomenon called the Indonesian Throughflow (see graphic, below).

Schematic currents and location of a leaky garbage patch in the southern Indian Ocean: Indonesian Throughflow (ITF), Leeuwin Current (LC), South Indian Counter Current (SICC), Agulhas Current (AC).
Author provided

This connection also results in the formation of the Leeuwin Current, a poleward (towards the South Pole) current that flows alongside Australia’s west coast.

As a result, the Southern Indian Ocean has poleward currents on both eastern and western margins of the ocean basin.

Also, the South Indian Counter Current flows eastwards across the entire width of the Southern Indian Ocean, through the centre of the subtropical gyre, from the southern tip of Madagascar to Australia.

The African continent ends at around 35 degrees south, which provides a connection between the southern Indian and Atlantic Oceans.

How to follow that rubbish

In contrast to other ocean basins, the Indian Ocean is under-sampled, with only a few measurements of plastic material available.
As technology to remotely track plastics does not yet exist, we need to use indirect ways to determine the fate of plastic in the Indian Ocean.

We used information from more than 22,000 satellite-tracked surface drifting buoys that have been released all over the world’s oceans since 1979.
This allowed us to simulate pathways of plastic waste globally, with an emphasis on the Indian Ocean.

Global simulated concentration of floating waste after 50 years.
Mirjam van der Mheen, Author provided

We found that unique characteristics of the Southern Indian Ocean transport floating plastics towards the ocean’s western side, where it leaks past South Africa into the South Atlantic Ocean.

Because of the Asian monsoon system, the southeast trade winds in the Southern Indian Ocean are stronger than the trade winds in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.
These strong winds push floating plastic material further to the west in the Southern Indian Ocean than they do in the other oceans.

So the rubbish goes where?

This allows the floating plastic to leak more readily from the Southern Indian Ocean into the South Atlantic Ocean.
All these factors contribute to an ill-defined garbage patch in the Southern Indian Ocean.Simulated concentration of floating waste over 50 years in the Indian Ocean.

Simulated concentration of floating waste over 50 years in the Indian Ocean.

In the Northern Indian Ocean our simulations showed there may be an accumulation of waste in the Bay of Bengal.

It is also likely that floating plastics will ultimately end up on beaches all around the Indian Ocean, transported by the reversing monsoon winds and currents.
Which beaches will be most heavily affected is still unclear, and will probably depend on the monsoon season.

Our study shows that the atmospheric and oceanic attributes of the Indian Ocean are different to other ocean basins and that there may not be a concentrated garbage patch.
Therefore the mystery of all the missing plastic is even greater in the Indian Ocean.

Links :