Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Brave robots are roaming the oceans for Science

John Valcarcel / Wired

From Wired by Matt Simon

At the crest of a swell, an orange wing sticks straight up out of the ocean, like the fin of a miserable orca waving to the crowd at SeaWorld.
That speck of color some 800 feet from the research vessel Paragon is part of an advanced seagoing robot, a drone, and the wing contains its antenna—which is talking to a satellite, which is talking to our skipper’s cell phone.
Once we’re alongside the machine, a scientist stretches to snag a loop on the 100-pound robot with a hooked pole, then starts hefting the drone up.
Another researcher grabs halfway down the body, and together the two men lug the drone aboard and gingerly place it on a stand.
It’s 6 feet long and shaped like an airliner, with two wings and a tail fin, and bears the message “OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTRUMENT PLEASE DO NOT DISTURB.”
All caps considered, though, it’s a more innocuous epigram than the one on a drone I saw back at the dock: “Not a weapon—Science Instrument.”

We’re bobbing in the sea just south of Santa Cruz, California; the Paragon is a pickup truck-shaped vessel, cabin in front and a flat deck with edges about a foot high, run by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute.
There’s no bathroom on board.
“Guys, it’s super easy. Any time, you’re welcome to go over the side,” says Jared Figurski, the MBARI marine operations division’s jack of all trades.
“Ladies just…let us know and we can set that up on the back deck too.”

While the old adage goes that scientists know more about the surface of the moon than the seafloor, that’s a two-dimensional way of thinking.
The oceans remain mysterious up and down the water column: the incredibly complex chemical and biological relationships, or how exactly the oceans are changing under the weight of global warming and other human meddling … acidity, temperatures, currents, salinity.
And the most powerful tool to help figure all that out is the drone.
MBARI has a fleet of them, three different kinds—autonomous machines that prowl the open oceans gathering data, allowing researchers to monitor it in real time.
The machines do not tire, and they cannot drown.
They survive shark bites.
They can roam for months on end, beaming a steady stream of data to scientists sitting safely onshore.
So while aerial drones may get all the love, it’s autonomous underwater vehicles like the one the Paragon just snagged that are doing the grunt work of ocean science.
They’re the vanguard of the robotization of Earth’s oceans.

 Our oceans are in peril, but on this morning we were treated to an astonishing feeding frenzy of perhaps a dozen humpback whales and dozens of dolphins, which had found a nice bait ball to consume.  
Josh Valcarcel/WIRED

Sea Change

Their arrival couldn’t come at a better time.
The oceans are in big, big trouble.
A study released in January found that we humans are on the verge of initiating a mass marine extinction with a dizzying number of threats.
Global warming is heating the oceans, forcing fish into new distributions.
The seas are absorbing the carbon dioxide we’re pumping into the air, leading to acidification that damages coral reefs.
Overfishing has decimated species.
Cargo ships are slamming into whales.
Old-fashioned pollution, oil drilling, oil spilling, Dubai building massive islands for rich idiots …
I could go on, but I’m probably depressing you.

The glider the Paragon picked up had been roaming for three or four weeks, but robots can potentially rove for six months, traveling some 2,500 miles.
It’s a simple design with an energy-saving trick: no traditional motor.
Instead, “they change their buoyancy,” says senior MBARI scientist Francisco Chavez.
“They move the center of gravity forward so they point down,” then modify their buoyancy to float closer to the surface, over and over, up and down.
In the air, a glider’s wings generate lift, relying on rising columns of air called thermals to get an extra boost.
With an underwater robot, those wings provide “lift” to keep it gliding too—without them, it’d sink straight down and bob right back up.
Buoyancy takes the place of a thermal.
The robots’ routes therefore resemble really long sine waves. And if they need to turn?
“They can move their center of mass by moving their batteries either left or right,” says Chavez.

All the while the drones collect troves of data, including temperature, salinity, pressure (a proxy for depth), and oxygen levels.
For salinity, the drone is measuring the conductivity of seawater, then using that value to calculate how much salt is present.
The oxygen sensor operates on a similar principle, passing water through a semi-permeable membrane, behind which is a chemical solution with electricity coursing through it.
The amount of oxygen changes the voltage.
And drones map the seafloor with sonar, firing sounds downward and measuring the echoes to reveal the terrain.

Not all drones are as simple as the glider.
On the other end of the spectrum is a fully motorized version, 8 feet long and almost 2 feet wide with a big propeller on the end, like a torpedo.
It can only last a few days out on its own, but while the glider is limited to depths of 650 feet, the big AUVs can dive over a mile.
Plus they can collect biological material—scales and plankton and flesh and such—by opening one of 10 spring-loaded cylinders and grabbing a water sample.
“You watch CSI, right, or something like that?” asks Chavez.
“They find the little hair or piece of skin from somebody and they run DNA analysis to see if they can prove a person is there or not. Well the same thing happens in the ocean.”
Sequencing whatever tissue the big drones pick up gives the researchers an idea of what animals are in a given area—but not how many of them there are.
Population size remains a challenge.

Rounding out MBARI’s fleet is a third, middle-ground variety.
Like the big AUV, it has a propeller, but it can also switch to the sine-wave propulsion of the glider, hitting distances of 600 miles.
This one’s referred to as a long-range AUV, and MBARI has some seriously excellent ideas for its future.
“We expect that someday the long-range AUVs will be operational in the sense that they will be able to pull into an underwater docking station, recharge, drop off whatever they have to drop off—be it data or samples—and then continue out on their mission,” says Chavez.
It’ll be like a Roomba returning to its station to juice up, only it’ll be packed with science instead of cat hair.

Oculus Primed


The fleet has collected an almost unimaginable amount of data, between mapping the seafloor and monitoring microscopic oceanic life and measuring salinity.
It’s numbers upon numbers upon numbers.
So many numbers, in fact, that MBARI had to build a whole new database to organize it all.
While we’re at it, someone thought, why don’t we just pipe the data into a virtual-reality headset so we can fly around the seafloor?
And so it was.


Back on land, MBARI software engineer Mike McCann asks if I want to be Superman.
I say OK, sure (I guess I’d be a fool not to), so he sits me at his desk and has me strap Oculus Rift virtual-reality goggles to my face.
And soon enough I’m flying through layer after layer of horizontal grids.
A motion sensor, the same sort of tech as the Xbox’s Kinect, has digitized my hands, so if I move them left or right, I turn.
Up and down adjusts my elevation, and to stop I simply raise my palms.
McCann hopes to someday replace this simple environment with a realistic model of the ocean, using data collected from AUVs. “It’s a ton of data,” he says.
“There’s millions of points, but if you want to experience them in a different way, you could just fly around Monterey Bay.”
There’s already a simple version of this, which you can see in action below.
That’s the undulating path of a drone, with the colors representing concentrations of phytoplankton (high values being red and low being purple), tiny plant-like organisms that sit at the base of the food chain, that the robot had collected.
That’s the seafloor below, imaged by a shipboard sonar system.

 An Oculus Rift VR simulation showing the path of a drone,
with colors representing concentrations of phytoplankton.  
Gif: © MBARI.

Remember when I said mapping the seafloor is a dated, two-dimensional way of thinking about the oceans?
This VR software is the beginning of a full-blown 3-D approach.
It’s ugly right now, sure, and I’ll just come out and say we didn’t get to see the demo firsthand because a bug had crippled it, but this is the glorious manifestation of oceanic data as a 3-D “experience.”
Soon enough, scientists won’t always need to sort through line after line after line of data.
That data will be a ride.
“Well, just to be honest, it’s still very experimental,” McCann says.
“The way that it enables the scientists to look at the data is so novel, so new, that we really haven’t figured out yet how it will be useful.”
But, he adds, “the potential is great because we can create a full 3-D virtual environment with animations, and those could include vertical migrations of animals as measured by the robots”—vertical migrations being the movement of creatures at night toward the surface, then down into the dark depths when the sun comes up, then back again.
(It’s about predator avoidance. Pretty much everyone is doing it.)

 Engineers at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) have developed a software package to help scientists visualize and understand complex oceanographic processes.
The free and open source Spatial Temporal Oceanographic Query System (STOQS) helps researchers deal with the large quantities of data produced by modern robotic platforms.

But first they have to get all of that AUV data into the Oculus.
That heavy lifting fell on McCann, who developed the Spatial Temporal Oceanographic Query System, aka STOQS (pronounced “stokes”), database software that compiles and visualizes the tens of millions of data points that a single robot can collect over a month.
Instead of just listing a bunch of figures, STOQS links every figure to every other figure, allowing researchers to compile complex visualizations—a godsend when you’re trying to understand the ocean’s complicated and interconnected phenomena.
Temperature and oxygen figures are intertwined, for example (cold water can hold more dissolved oxygen), and can’t just sit isolated.
And this is all open-source, so any other institution can incorporate it into a drone program.

Efficient analysis of growing types of oceanographic observations requires new approaches in data management.
This presentation will demonstrate such capabilities using data collected for the purposes of understanding zooplankton and primary production ecology in the coastal upwelling environment of Monterey Bay, California.

McCann walks me through STOQS on his computer, clicking through all manner of measurements—actually taken a couple of years before by the very glider Paragon retrieved—visualized as bar graphs: oxygen, salinity, etc.
The salinity bit looks weird, though, with a few conspicuously red bars.
“These are obviously some data errors, probably sucked up a jelly or something and it wasn’t able to measure salinity right,” McCann says with a laugh.
He gets to a map that shows the route the glider had been programmed to follow and clicks a button that turns it into that kind of Oculus 3-D map you saw above, with the robot’s wavy path cutting through the water.
Its undulations are color-coded to show what concentrations of salinity the robot encountered at any given point.
The figures aren’t just numbers anymore, or even your average visualization—they’re the robot’s 3-D journey through Monterey Bay.
I ask McCann, “What about loading the drones with video cameras and piping that video into the Oculus?” He says, oh hell yeah—though not in those exact words—but yes, it’d be totally doable.
So just imagine, someday you might find yourself with a computer strapped to your face, drifting through the deep as bioluminescent critters pop all around you.
Then, inevitably, a giant squid will rocket up from the depths and give you a full-blown VR panic attack.
Giant squid are reliable like that.

 Launching the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s SeaBED AUV draws a crowd.  
Hanu Singh © Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

With a Little Help From My Friends

MBARI isn’t the only place where AUVs are changing ocean research.
Clear across the continent in Massachusetts, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, home of the famed Alvin crewed submersible, maintains its own fleet.
WHOI gussied Alvin up with a slew of upgrades last year, but like the folks at Monterey Bay, its focus has been shifting toward AUVs.
Its vision for the drone-y future is different than Monterey Bay’s, though—Woods Hole researchers are focused on using drones in often dangerous shallow water expeditions, not so much sending them into the open ocean.
“We started out saying, ‘Look, we don’t want to go to the deep ocean, which is where these other vehicles go,'” says Hanumant Singh, a roboticist at Woods Hole.
“We want to work on things like archaeology. We want to work on things like fisheries, coral reef ecology. So shallower water.”
Want to count some fish or monitor penguins?
Give Woods Hole a call.
Need to explore the edge of a glacier—an incredibly dangerous task for a human, what with all the falling ice?
A robot can do it.
WHOI’s drones have monitored radiation levels around Japan post-Fukushima and determined the coastal impacts of Hurricane Sandy.
And unlike Monterey Bay’s drones, WHOI’s take video in addition to sampling things like temperature and salinity.

 A smarter undersea robot (WHOI)

But this isn’t a competition.
By deploying the different techniques, Woods Hole and Monterey Bay are collecting a huge range of data.
Woods Hole is doing more immediate work, say, checking on the health of a coral reef, while Monterey is building something on a grander temporal and spatial scale.
“If we only did one, if we only did research expeditions, that wouldn’t be right,” says Singh.
“If we only said we’re only going to do these repeat surveys of the area, which is small, then that wouldn’t be right because there’s all these other phenomena that we need to understand. So I think getting that mix right is important.”

Woods Hole has open-sourced their AUV designs, and will even build the things at the request of other institutions.
“Even just 20 years ago we were very data poor in the oceans,” Singh says.
“We borrowed ships, we threw something over the side, we’d get a couple of points, and we’d feel happy. And then we started getting all of these robots.”
More and more it’ll be the AUVs that will help scientists better understand our changing seas: Monterey Bay’s gliders out taking the Pacific Ocean’s temperature and gulping up water samples, WHOI’s expeditionary drones checking in on reefs and glaciers.
And sure, at this point researchers are only touching a fraction of what’s out there.
But it’s a start.

Courtesy of Klaus Meiners, Australian Antarctic Division, 
Peter Kimball, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Bon Voyage, Shiny Robot Friend

Picking up an aging underwater robot isn’t the Paragon’s only mission on our trip off Santa Cruz. Lauren Cooney, a consultant with Teledyne Marine Systems, has hitched a ride to launch its latest, greatest model of glider.
It looks a lot like the one the Monterey Bay scientists collected, but it’s shinier—a brilliant yellow—and has a propeller to power it in a pinch.

As it sits on the deck, Cooney runs diagnostics on her laptop from the cabin, spinning up the propeller and such.
When it comes time to launch, the skipper ties a rope with a trailing floatie around the glider’s tail (if something goes awry, that floatie will save Cooney the embarrassment of losing a robot worth tens of thousands of dollars).
The glider is on a stretcher of sorts, two perpendicular metal poles, which Cooney and the skipper drag around, pulling one end over the edge of the boat.
Cooney picks up the other end and without fanfare hefts it up, sliding the robot into the sea.
It sinks a bit until the floatie holds it.
As the Paragon pulls away, Cooney runs still more diagnostics, testing the robot’s ballast, floating and sinking it.
When she’s satisfied, we approach again, and another scientist snags it by the rope and slices it off.
Cooney performs the ballast test once more and, satisfied, tells the skipper we can return to shore. The newest underwater robot sinks slowly under the waves, disappearing into the dark unknown.

Josh Valcarcel/Wired

Links :

Monday, April 13, 2015

The Observer view on the destruction of the world’s great coral reefs

 Coral on Australia's Great Barrier Reef, which has now been added to Unesco's list of world heritage sites 'in danger'.
Photograph: Reuters

From The Guardian

The world’s reefs are under increasing threat from manmade depredations.
They are too valuable a resource to be lost  

In a few weeks, members of Unesco’s world heritage committee will meet in Bonn to discuss a simple, but disturbing proposition: that Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest coral reef system, be listed as being “in danger”.
The reef, worth an estimated $Aus5bn (£2.6bn) a year in tourism to the nation, is a world heritage site and contains more than 400 types of coral and 1,500 species of fish.
Set in turquoise waters off the coast of Queensland, the 1,400-mile reef is one of the planet’s greatest wonders, but is now being eroded at an alarming rate.

 Great Barrier reef general nautical chart with the Marine GeoGarag

Rising sea temperatures, increasing ocean acidification, swelling numbers of cyclones in recent years, pollution problems triggered by fertiliser and sewage run-offs from farms and cities, and damage caused by the development of ports on the east coast of Australia to help the country to supply China with coal have had a combined and devastating effect on the Great Barrier Reef.


In the past 30 years, it has lost half its coral.
Had the Taj Mahal, another world heritage site, lost half its structure, there would be no doubt that it would be deemed to be in danger.
Hence the pressure from green groups to give the reef such a listing, a damning status that has so far been awarded to only 46 of Unesco’s total of 1,007 world heritage sites.

 Lady Musgrave Island in the Unesco-listed Great Barrier Reef marine park.
Unesco will decide in June whether to list the reef as ‘in danger’.
Photograph: Parer-Cook/Auscape/Minden Pictures/Corbis

The prospect has only recently produced a response from the Australian government.
Its prime minister, Tony Abbott, has realised that the tainting of one of his country’s major attractions as being in danger – and, by inference, poorly managed – is not good for tourism and has hastily introduced measures to curtail pollution and given pledges to spend several billion dollars on reef relief work.
It remains to be seen if these measures will be enough to halt the Great Barrier Reef’s decay or save it from an “in danger” listing by Unesco.
There is, in fact, only a limited amount that Australia can do on its own to save the reef.
Many factors lie beyond the nation’s immediate control.
In particular, rising temperatures round the world and increased ocean acidification, both caused by soaring global emissions of carbon dioxide, are today destroying coral across the planet, while a third factor, over-fishing, has now brought the status of most reefs to crisis level.

 This is what the Great Barrier Reef looks like from where ISS space station
(Photo: NASA, Astronaut Wheelock)

According to a report co-authored by British and Australian scientists and published last week, the planet’s already beleaguered coral reefs, which are some of Earth’s most important nurseries for marine life, are now being further assailed by industrial fishing fleets.
The researchers examined more than 800 reefs in 64 locations around the world and found that 83% had lost more than half of their fish, most of these losses having occurred since the 1970s.
Apart from the danger posed to many species of fish, the impact on reefs themselves is also alarming, the scientists warn.
Rudderfish, parrotfish, damselfish and other reef denizens eat invertebrates and remove algae, which can smother and kill off coral.
Take away these piscine predators and the reef starts to decay.
And even when protective measures to control and limit fishing are imposed, it can take up to 60 years for a reef to recover.


 BBC report

It is a gloomy vision, though the authors of the report also point out that they were encouraged to find that, when some form of management is imposed at a reef, substantial amounts of biomass, both fish and coral, can survive there.
In other words, by managing fisheries, some coral reefs could be given a chance to thrive.

In the long term, however, it is hard to be optimistic.
Rising ocean acidification – “the evil twin of global warming” – will continue until fossil fuel burning and carbon dioxide emissions are curtailed by international agreement.
Only then is there a chance that coral reef erosion will stop.
We should be under no illusions about what is at risk. Coral reefs occupy less than 0.1% of the world’s ocean surface, but provide homes for around a quarter of all marine species.
Their value to the planet was once summed by David Attenborough in an interview in the Observer.
As he observed, if you want beauty and if you want to see wildlife, there is no better prospect than a visit to a coral reef.
These places abound with brilliantly coloured fish and corals.
As Attenborough put it, the sight is mind-blowing.
The world therefore has a choice: curtail industrial fishing and limit carbon emissions – or risk losing these natural wonders forever.

Links :

Sunday, April 12, 2015

JRC reveals global traffic routes using LRIT ship tracking data



The video shows the main traffic routes followed at global scale by ships flying the flag of States contributing to the EU Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Cooperative Data Centre (CDC): all EU Member States, Iceland, Norway, and Overseas Territories of EU Member States*.

The LRIT vessel positions are refreshed every 6 hours and reconstructed every hour using the European Commission Joint Research Centre's “Blue Hub” technology.
The video covers a period of one month, giving a first insight into the potential of the data for performing statistical and other analysis of maritime transport routes of vessels flying EU LRIT CDC flags.

The LRIT vessel positions can be polled over delimited areas by operational authorities in specific circumstances such as for Search and Rescue. In these cases, there appear also data from States not participating in the EU LRIT CDC, leading to flashing spotlights in the animation (e.g. in the Atlantic Ocean or in the Mediterranean Sea).

Further information:
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/scientific-tool/blue-hub-rd-platform-maritime-surveillance-and-maritime-situational-awareness?search

*Access to the data was granted by the National Competent Authorities for LRIT of States participating in the EU LRIT CDC through the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA).‎

Cities, towns, shipping routes, global roads and air networks are all changing Earth.
This video shows the extent of this change.

Friday, April 10, 2015

Wiring the world below

A network of permanent observatories will soon monitor the oceans

From The Economist

The planet arrogantly dubbed “Earth” by its dominant terrestrial species might more accurately be called “Sea”.
Seven-tenths of its surface is ocean, yet humanity’s need to breathe air and its inability to resist pressure means this part of the orb is barely understood.

In June a project designed to help correct that will open for business.
The seven sites of the United States’ Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI), scattered around the Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans, will measure physical, chemical, geological and biological phenomena from the seabed to the surface.
They will join three similar Canadian facilities, VENUS and NEPTUNE in the Pacific, which have been operating since 2006 and 2009 respectively, and the Arctic observatory in Cambridge Bay, an inlet of the Arctic Ocean, which opened in 2012.

The American project was conceived jointly with Canada, which secured funding first.
Canada’s near decade-long operational experience should help to provide pointers to make the bigger operation a success.
The OOI’s metaphorical flagship is the Cabled Array, which is being deployed off the coasts of Oregon and Washington, to the south of VENUS and NEPTUNE, with which it will collaborate.
In particular, these observatories have a remit to study a suboceanic piece of the Earth’s crust called the Juan de Fuca plate, which is being overridden by the North American plate’s progress westward as part of the stately geological dance called plate tectonics.

As its name suggests, the Cabled Array is organised around a submarine cable—a 900km-long power and data connection between its base in Oregon and its seven submarine nodes (see illustration). These nodes are linked, in turn, to 17 junction boxes that distribute power and signals to the system’s instruments, and collect data from them. It is also connected to “profiler moorings” that let instruments travel up and down a wire stretching from the surface to the bottom, allowing a cross-section of the water column to be sampled at regular intervals. 

Strange life

One of the Cabled Array’s jobs is to measure the Juan de Fuca plate’s volcanic and seismological activity, including the output of its hydrothermal vents—submarine springs from which superheated mineral-laden water emerges.
These support very unusual forms of life which are not found in any other habitat.
It will also, though, study more quotidian matters, such as ocean currents and chemistry, and the biological productivity of the area.

The other six observatories are tied to moorings and are powered by battery, sun and wind.
They will send their data ashore via satellite.
Like the Cabled Array, each has at least one profiler mooring and also a range of instruments at various fixed depths.
These moored observatories, though, can reach out beyond the range of their fixed instruments using robots.

Slocum Teledyne glider

Most of these robots are torpedo-shaped ocean gliders (one of which is pictured above) that “fly” long distances through the sea, sampling sunlight penetration, chlorophyll and oxygen concentrations, and the density, pressure, temperature and salinity of the water.
The ocean gliders travel by slowly decreasing their buoyancy to sink, and then increasing it again to rise.
The hydrodynamic shape of their wings means that both rising and falling drives them forward at a leisurely rate of about 1.5kph.

One observatory, called Pioneer, is also equipped with propeller-driven autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), that can swim more strongly against currents.
It is one of two moored close to shore—in its case, the shore of New England.
The other, Endurance, is off the coast of Oregon.
Both will measure processes such as upwelling (important for the recycling of nutrients that have fallen to the seabed), oxygen depletion (which is often caused by pollution), and the dramatic changes in water temperature, salinity and currents that happen where the continental shelf dives into the abyss.


The remaining four observatories are stationed in deeper water.
At their sites the seabed is between 2,800 and 5,200 metres below the surface.
Irminger Sea is next to Greenland; Argentine Basin lies in the South Atlantic; Southern Ocean is stationed off Chile’s southern tip; Ocean Station Papa is in the Gulf of Alaska.
Each of these observatories will sit at one corner of a triangular study area with sides up to 62km long, the other corners of which are occupied by fixed daughter stations.
Each study area will also be patrolled by gliders.

In combination, the OOI’s seven observatories will carry 830 instruments, including 32 gliders and three AUVs.
The wealth of data this equipment produces will be funnelled back to Rutgers University in New Jersey and then, as is increasingly required of science, made immediately available to all and sundry. This is, after all, a taxpayer-financed project—to the tune of $385m for the construction alone.

Not everyone is happy with such open access.
Some old-school oceanographers worry that they will work on a question thrown up by the data, only to be scooped.
Many, no doubt, are more used to going to sea to collect samples than having data delivered to their desks.
A report earlier this year by America’s National Academy of Sciences was less than enthusiastic about the OOI.
It found “a lack of broad community support for this initiative, exacerbated by an apparent absence of scientific oversight during the construction process”.

That absence, though, was probably one reason the project’s co-ordinators, a not-for-profit group called the Consortium for Ocean Leadership, managed to adhere to the OOI’s construction timetable.
Having a plan and sticking to it without other people shoving their oars in always makes it easier for contractors to meet their deadlines.
Whether such punctuality has been bought at the expense of scientific effectiveness remains to be seen.
And failures there will no doubt be.
VENUS and NEPTUNE have suffered from corroded instruments, underwater landslides and damage from trawler nets.
Canada has learned from these problems.
For instance, it now discuss the project with fishermen and points out where equipment is located. Some researchers also think the OOI is short on staff.
Canada’s observatories have five researchers overseeing 180 instruments.
The OOI’s 830 will be overseen by a mere quartet.

Axial Seamount : Understanding submarine volcanoes


Undersea observatories are ambitious projects, so it will take time to get them right and attract people to use the free data.
One way the organisers hope to entice users is by putting instruments on Axial Seamount, an underwater volcano about 480km west of Oregon that could erupt at any time.
Being able to monitor an undersea eruption live would be exciting—and not something conventional research methods could manage.
There is nothing like a firework display to attract a crowd.

Links :