Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Marine GeoGarage : website temporarily down for maintenance


Version 2 of the Google Maps JavaScript API which was used for the Marine GeoGarage web application since 2010 has been deprecated by Google and officially turned down for existing applications on Tuesday November 19, 2013 (actually early this morning on Wednesday 20th).





The maintenance period is used to migrate the basic features of the Marine GeoGarage to the v3 API.

We are sorry for this inconvenience, please check back later.

Notes :
Maintenance only affects the User Interface of our route planning and viewing web app, but not the nautical charts stored in our Cloud Computing solution, so :
- universal iPhone & iPad mobile apps (which are not using Google Maps API) continue to work for viewing charts.
- no problem for our B2B customers who use our different chart layers in their own web applications.


Is this Polar Pod genius or just plain insanity?


Polar Pod
from Sylvain Bergeon (for francophones)

The polar Pod is a project of vertical buoying scientific exploration station that will allow a team of 7 people, scientist and crew, to navigate around the Antarctic pole during one year.
This project, lead by the famous explorer Jean-Louis Etienne, is currently in its study phase. 

From Deep Sea News

People come up with all sorts of wacky ideas to explore the oceans.
And here is another one of those ideas.
Meet the Polar Pod, a manned research platform dreamed up by French Explorer/Physician Jean-Louis Etienne to drift around Antarctica in the Southern Ocean.
My first thought when I saw this concept was WTF.


But upon further inspection, I became intrigued.
Modeled after Scripp’s R/P FLIP, the Polar Pod is a floating stick with a giant weight at the bottom to keep it ballasted and upright so the living quarters that are stuck on top don’t tilt into the ocean (this FLIP don’t FLOP).
When FLIP is upright, it is a super stable platform is almost completely unaffected by waves.
The Polar Pod is a little different, as it has an open frame, making it more susceptible to wave action. Even so, the designers think it will still be pretty stable, only swaying as much as 5 degrees making it nearly seasickness proof.

The Antarctic Circumpolar Current :
24000 kms / 15000 mi long and 1000 kms / 620 mi wide, it is the most powerful current on the planet.
Driven by legendary winds - the famous "furious fifties" - nothing stops its great swell around Antarctica.
The biological activity there is intense; it is a vast sanctuary for seabirds and marine mammals.

And this is perfect, because Explorer Etienne wants to set this thing adrift in the Southern Ocean, circling Antarctica via the massive current that flow around it, the Antarctic Circumpolar Current.

 A major player in the climate :
Its cold waters absorb a significant portion of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activities.
Just like a drive belt, it connects the waters of the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans, to the cold waters of the cold waters of the Antarctic ocean.
It helps insulate the cold of Antarctica from the mid latitudes heat fluxes.
It is the main source of the World Ocean deep water formation.
The freeze and thaw periods around Antarctica feed the formation of deep water.

As I said before, I’ve been somewhat fascinated by this entire concept since I first learned about it. Mostly because it really made me think of the feasibility of such an experiment.
So let’s start on a positive note, the cons of this project:

1. The Southern Ocean can be nuts.
Massive winds, waves and not to mention icebergs make it a sane mariners nightmare (bah, who am I kidding. No dedicated mariner is completely sane).
If they can manage to stay afloat for an entire year, then kudos to them.

2. They plan to use the platform to observe the Southern Ocean.
Getting oceanographic data in the Southern Ocean is hard.
The window of ‘good’ weather is small so ships don’t go there to take data during certain times of the year. But the Polar Pod will be there!
And maybe what they observe will help to fill the gaps in our scientific knowledge.

3. Power.
When scientists themselves aren’t exploring the Southern Ocean in ships, they are sending all sorts of autonomous oceanographic robots down there to explore it.
But these things are run on batteries, and batteries don’t have a lot of power.
Whatever instruments are mounted on these autonomous samplers need to sip power.
And the number of instruments that do this are limited.
But hopefully for all of those onboard, the Polar Pod will have a bigger power generator.
This means MOAR POWER and MOAR INSTRUMENTS!
Even fancier, you could even power satellite internet.
Send all that data back to us scientists on shore and simultaneously Skype with all your friends back home.

4. Instrumentation.
The underwater spar can be rigged up with all sorts of instruments.
Get profiles of water velocity with high-powered ADCP current meters, sure.
String of CTD’s down the side, yes please!
Drop turbulence profiler off the side, OUI!
And for good measure, slap a meteorological station on the top.

Jean-Louis Etienne, France's most famous living explorer, sat with the French Embassy press team to discuss his life of adventure.
Dr. Etienne has led or been a part of expeditions to the farthest-flung corners of the earth — including Mount Everest, worldwide sailing journeys, and both poles — since 1975.

Now for the cons:

1. The Southern Ocean can be nuts.
Who is going to rescue them if they run into trouble?
And how is a freely drifting ship going to avoid ice bergs?
What if hits one of those pesky ice bergs?

2. Supplies.
Both food and fuel will have to resupplied via boat, which is a sort of nutty idea.
From talking to people that have been on FLIP, moving anything from a small boat that is going up and down with the waves to a platform that is not moving at all is a potentially stupid dangerous situation. I can’t even imagine what it would be like in the Southern Ocean swell.
But from what I can gather, is seems as though everything will be done by winch from the ends of it’s wings, which may make it a lot easier.

3. A proposed oceanographic research platform with no science plan (that I can find).
Is this guy for real?
You can’t tout your new multimillion euro vessel as a oceanographic research platform and have no science plan *pulls hair out in frustration*.
But then again, his plan could be that this is a ship of opportunity for scientists who will then dictate what can and can’t be done.
Anyway, I am curious to see what will happen with this project.
It may never materialize.
But at least it got me thinking of all the expensive shit I could drop into the Southern Ocean.

Links :

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Ortho Littorale France Atlantique v2


Ortho littorale v2 (2011) MEDDE

All the aerial stitched pictures were made in the quest of optimum viewing
with the specific conditions:
no swell, no rain for 48 hours, large tide (foreshore) and lower low water (water depth less than 1m), ...

Arcachon (OrthoLittorale v2 view)

Note : this layer can be accessible as any GeoGarage georeferenced layer for external webmapping applications via the GeoGarage API.
So don't hesitate to contact us if your are interested.

Links :

Mystery of how the wandering albatross travels 10,000 miles in a single journey without flapping its wings is solved


Dynamic Soaring: How the Wandering Albatross Can Fly for Free
The wandering albatross spends weeks, even months, at sea without ever returning to land.
With precise GPS data and custom navigation software, researchers have finally figured out how. 
Animation: Institute of Flight System Dynamics

From DailyMail

  • Wandering albatross fly using a technique known as 'dynamic soaring'
  • Involves gaining height by angling their wings while flying into the wind
  • The mighty birds can then turn and swoop along for up to 100 metres
  • By repeatedly using this method, the birds can travel thousands of miles without flapping their wings
The mighty albatross can use its huge 3.5 metre wings to circumnavigate the globe in just 46 days.
But its ability to travel 10,000 miles in a single journey, without expending almost any energy, has long confounded scientists.
Now a team of researchers believe they have worked out how these majestic creatures are able to stay aloft in the skies without flapping their enormous wings.

 The mighty albatross can use its huge 3.5 metre wings to circumnavigate the globe in just 46 days.
But its ability to travel 10,000 miles in a single journey, without expending almost any energy, has long confounded scientists

Researchers, led by Gottfried Sachs of the University of Technology, Munich, used advanced GPS tracking on a group of 16 wandering albatross.
This allowed them to measure each bird’s position 10 times a second and to within a few centimetres, providing a detailed record of their flight path.
They found that once in the air, the birds performed a flying trick that seemed to involve characteristic repetitive up and down manoeuvres – a technique known as ‘dynamic soaring’.

This map reveals the distance that a wandering albatross from the island of Kerguelen can travel without flapping its wings

The 4850 km path (projected to the sea surface) of a long-distance flight of a wandering albatross is shown. GPS tracking stopped after the first 6 days of this 30-day-long foraging trip

Dynamic soaring involves the birds gaining height by angling their wings while flying into the wind.
They can then turn and swoop along for up to 100 metres at speeds of up to 67 miles per hour.
By repeatedly using this method, the scientists believe the wandering albatross can travel thousands of miles without flapping its wings.
Aerospace engineer Gottfried Sachs said dynamic soaring has been observed before, but its mechanics have remained a mystery since as early as the 1880s.
‘Students of the albatross’s flight understood early on that the bottommost layer of wind blowing above any surface, including that of water, will incur friction and thus slow down,’ explained Professor Sachs, writing in IEEE Spectrum. 

 Illustration: Emily Cooper
Flying Free as a Breeze: Unflapping flight, called dynamic soaring, allows the wandering albatross to extract energy from the shear wind field, in which the wind’s strength increases with each additional meter above the water’s surface.
Beginning near the surface, the bird climbs into the wind [1], turns to leeward [2], descends [3], and again turns into the wind [4].

‘This layer itself then becomes an obstacle that slows the layer just above it’.
This result is a 10 to 20-metre high region known as a ‘boundary layer’ through which the wind speed increases smoothly the higher you go in the field.
‘Dynamic soaring manoeuvres extract energy from that field, enabling the albatross to fly in any direction, even against the wind, with hardly any effort,’ said Professor Sachs.
Exactly how the bird extracts energy from a horizontally blowing wind, however, was a puzzle.
By combining computer modelling with GPS tracking, the team were able to accuratley simulate the flight of the bird in different wind speeds.

Wandering albatross have the record for the bird with the largest wingspan at 3.5 metres.
Distances are hard to measure, but one banded bird was recorded travelling 6000 km in twelve days.
They spend most of their life on the wing, returning to land only to court a mate and to breed.
The female Albatross lays just one egg that can weigh 1.2lb (0.5kg), in a basic nest on the ground.
The parents take it in turns to incubate the egg for 2-3 months depending on the size of the Albatross species.
Chicks can take anywhere from 5 to 10 months to fledge, depending on the size of the Albatross species.
Albatross are very long living Birds with an average age of between 40 and 50 years old.

Each dynamic soaring cycle consists of (1) a windward climb, (2) a curve from wind at the upper altitude, (3) a descent and (4) a curve from the wind at a low altitude, close to the sea surface
Dynamic soaring involves the birds gaining height by angling their wings while flying into the wind.
The technique involves flying from the relatively windless layer close to the ocean waves into a region of much faster winds above it.
This gives the birds a boost in airspeed that allows them to soar 30 to 50 feet into the air.
Then they turn, gliding with the wind to get an additional speed boost while swooping downward close to the sea waves.
By repeatedly using this method, the wandering albatross can travel thousands of miles without flapping its wings.

They found that albatross could soar dynamically as long as the wind speed is a bit more than 30 kilometers per hour (16 knots).
Their results also indicated that the shear wind field alone could enable the flight of the birds.



While the albatross had existed for about 50 million years, today it is estimated that fishing vessels kill one albatross every five minutes.
Longlining poses the greatest single threat to seabirds worldwide.
Boats cast lines up to 80 miles long carrying thousands of baited hooks, which trap the birds and drag them under - drowning them.
All 22 species are in trouble with eight currently critically endangered.

Links :
  • Spectrum : The Nearly Effortless Flight of the Albatross

Monday, November 18, 2013

Ocean of Life: How our seas are changing, by Callum Roberts – review

Roberts tells a wonder-filled story of humankind and the sea, including its horrors

From The Guardian

The best science writers can command words, imagery and cadence to match any award-winning novelist.
That is not, however, why we read science books.
We read them for what they have to tell us: the best science books are triumphs of substance over style, and Ocean of Life is one of them.

Callum Roberts starts with something that could hardly be more substantial: the 70% of the planet that most of us know almost nothing about, even though it is the planet's defining feature, and the birthplace and nursery for all known life.
Roberts is a marine biologist and an occasional columnist for the Guardian.
His command of research is prodigious, and his generosity with example is prodigal.
He is good on the big picture, but he understands even better how to burnish an argument with gleaming detail.

Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Are there plenty more fish in the sea?
For every hour spent fishing today, in boats bristling with the latest electronics, fishers land just 6% of what they did 120 years ago; landings per unit of fishing power are down 16 times for plaice, over 100 times for haddock, 500 times for halibut.
In 1870 a Massachusetts newspaper reported that predator bluefish drove the local menhaden ashore and upriver so thickly "that one could take a common fork and pitch them into the boat".
In 1785, a Loch Fyne fisherman told a visiting MP that it was not unusual to catch 350 turbot, sole and "large, fine flounders" on just one long line of 400 hooks.

Of course, the catastrophe of overfishing is compounded by climate change, sea level rise and ocean acidification.
On the Antarctic Peninsula, Adélie penguins that once nested in snow now huddle ankle deep in mud, downy feathers adapted for snow are soaked in sleet and drizzle, and chicks die.
Adélie populations on the Peninsula are down 90% in 30 years.
In the last 25 years, the North Sea has warmed 1.25C. Of 36 species surveyed in the North Sea, 15 have moved northwards by an average of 300km.
The alternative, since water cools with depth, is to dive a little.
At the present rate of warming, fish would have to submerge 3.5 metres every year.
But light falters with depth, so herbivores can only survive in the zone of photosynthesis.


Sea levels are rising: in the first seven years after its opening in 1984 the Thames Barrier was shut four times; now it closes between five and 10 times a year.
The Mississippi delta loses 50 square kilometres of land a year through a combination of subsidence and sea level rise.

Naturally occurring "champagne seas" off Ischia are home to molluscs with paper-thin shells "so weak they can be crushed between thumb and finger".
But humans are altering the chemistry of the oceans on a global scale.
When in 1998 Joanie Kleypas, a US expert in coral reefs, first realised that by the 21st century corals would be bathed in water corrosive enough to destroy them, she found the discovery so overwhelming that she excused herself and ran to the bathroom to be sick.


Roberts is alive to the small things.
Pteropods grow in polar seas to densities of 10,000 per cubic metre "within shell castles sculpted from transparent crystal whose cold beauty seems perfectly fitted to icy seas".
They are a keystone species in the food web: within 50 years they could be off the menu because of acidification.
All the viruses in the ocean – four billion to a litre of clear seawater – if stretched end to end in a thread a 200th of the thickness of the finest spider gossamer, would stretch for 200 million light years "so far across the universe it would pass by 60 galaxies".

 La Jolla - Red tide

Roberts has a way of bringing marine disaster closer to home.
The long summer vacation of British parliamentarians is not a reward for their legislative labours but a consequence of the Great Stink of 1858, in which a Thames choked with sewage and refuse became so vile that parliament's windows were hung with sheets soaked with bleach.
Summer sittings were subsequently abandoned.
Cycles of nutrient overload and plankton bloom are now exported downriver to the sea, where oxygen levels plummet and everything that cannot move simply dies and rots.
Off the Mississippi delta, the dead zone at its peak now extends across 20,000 square kilometres of sea.

There are winners – there are always winners – and one beneficiary of the combination of nutrient enrichment, low oxygen and overfishing are the jellyfish; polyps that are 95% water, "blobs of seawater wrapped in a transparent glaze", some of them toxic to the touch.
In 2004, in Monaco alone "an estimated 45,000 swimmers were treated for stings".


He is good on the horrors of oil spills but he points out that the Gulf of Mexico's fishing fleets kill more marine life in a day than BP's notorious Deepwater Horizon disaster did in months.
Oil companies are easy to demonise but the biggest source of oil pollution is either run off from land or directly injected by the two stroke engine of the recreational boat: the floating fuel and oils concentrate on the surface, poisoning the eggs and hungry larvae of hundreds of species.
There the oils join the polychlorinated biphenyls from plasticisers and fire retardants and other persistent organic pollutants that concentrate in the ocean's meniscus.
This is a surface layer "not much thicker than a piece of kitchen clingfilm" that is rich in fats, fatty acids, proteins, floating eggs and millions of microorganisms, a region critical to life in the sea.
So the pollutants find their way into the fat and breast milk of the ocean's top predators.


By weight, a third of all human waste is plastic: an enduring polymer that also ends up in the ocean gyres, on beaches and shores and reefs even in the remotest regions, and of course in the stomachs of albatrosses, turtles, sharks and even whales.
"A dead pygmy sperm whale stranded in Texas had a plastic rubbish bin liner, a bread wrapper, a crisp packet and two other pieces of plastic sheeting choking off its stomach."
A dead albatross chick in the Pacific contained a piece of plastic with a serial number – "it was traced to a US bomber that had crashed into the sea in 1944".

And don't even get him started on the so-called silent world, a world in fact blasted by the roar of supertanker engines, of military sonar and seismic explosions, a world in which any noise travels at five times its speed in air.
In Ocean of Life, Roberts tells a wonder-filled story of humankind and the sea: all of it illuminating, not all of it hopeless, and some of it unexpectedly exhilarating.

Links :
  • WSJ : Fathoming the Ocean's Future