Showing posts with label marine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marine. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

European Union authorizes military action against people smugglers

UE agrees to use force against migrant smugglers in Mediterranean

From IBTimes by Aditya Tejas

European Union nations on Monday approved proposals for military action against people smugglers who helped refugees cross the Mediterranean, authorizing a plan that called for the seizure and destruction of boats to break up smuggling networks operating out of Libya.

The E.U. had launched a naval mission in July that conducted intelligence gathering, but the new ruling makes it legal to stop and, if necessary, destroy boats which are found to be involved in people trafficking.
"The conditions have been met," an unnamed European diplomat told Agence France-Presse.

 More than 100,000 migrants have reached Italy via boat this year;
thousands of others have died trying.
(Twitter/Italian Navy)

However, the second phase of the operation limits authorization for E.U. naval activities to international waters.
The third phase would involve military action against people smugglers inside Libyan territorial waters.
The third phase would require authorization from the U.N. Security Council and preferably an agreement with the Libyan government.
Russia, current president of the Security Council, has said that a resolution authorizing military activity in international waters could be adopted this month.

 The tragic journey of about 500 migrants who died seeking to reach Europe (IOM)
IBTimes

An internal document on the proposed military action warned that "non-compliant boarding operations against smugglers in the presence of migrants has a high risk of collateral damage including the loss of life,” EUObserver reported.
The decision comes as E.U. nations struggle to deal with a massive influx of refugees fleeing conflict in the Middle East and Africa. E.U. interior ministers are set to meet later in the day to agree on quotas for redistributing refugees among member countries, a proposal that several nations have strongly condemned.

Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and other nations have boosted security along their border, taken steps to keep refugees out or move them into other countries, or expressed their intent to object to the quota plan.
Germany, which had so far championed the cause of taking in refugees and announced plans to resettle over 800,000 this year, said Sunday that it would implement controls along its border with Austria, contradicting the open borders mandated in the Schengen agreement

 European Union officials authorized a plan to take naval action against people smugglers bringing thousands of refugees across the Mediterranean.
In this photo, a Syrian refugee holding a baby in a lifetube swims towards the shore after their dinghy deflated some 100m away before reaching the Greek island of Lesbos, on Sept 13, 2015.
Reuters/Alkis Konstantinidis

The International Organization of Migration said last week that an unprecedented number of migrants have made the risky crossing across the Mediterranean by boat so far in 2015.
The agency reported 432,761 had reached Europe by sea this year, more than double the number of the year before. Nearly 3,000 have lost their lives in the passage.
E.U.-led efforts to help broker a national unity government in Libya have not borne fruit, but special U.N. envoy Bernardino Leon said Sunday that progress was being made.

Links :

Monday, September 14, 2015

Melting Antarctica could drown coasts much sooner than you thought

Calving ice near Paradise Harbor in Antarctica in Jan. 2015.
The continent's ice sheet and the rest of the world's land ice would melt if all the world's fossil fuels were burned, a new climate study found.
Credit Ralph Lee Hopkins/National Geographic Creative

From Scientific American by David Biello

Seas could rise as fast as three centimeters a year if fossil fuel consumption continues at its present rate.
Such increases would amount to ten times the current rise of roughly three millimeters annually.
But Antarctica's vast ice sheets may substantially melt and accelerate the rise of seawaters should the burning of fossil fuel continue unabated, according to new computer simulations of climate change’s future impact.
Scientists had previously thought that East Antarctica's massive ice sheets were relatively safe, requiring thousands of years to pass before warming global temperatures would begin to melt them.

Unchecked fossil fuel use will see the larger east Antarctic ice sheet melt, as well as the west one, causing devastating sea level rise, say scientists.
Photograph: DMS Team/Nasa

But the new simulations, published in Science Advances on September 11, suggest Antarctica's ice is much more vulnerable—and thus sea level rise could be a lot worse.
"Humanity can indeed melt all of Antarctica's ice, if we were to burn all of the fossil fuels," says Ricarda Winkelmann, a physicist by training who now works on computer models at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
"What we do today by emitting greenhouse gases within just a few decades triggers changes that will be felt by many, many generations to come."


A trip to Antarctica inspired Winkelmann’s interest in the longevity of the ice on the iciest continent as carbon dioxide continues to accumulate in the atmosphere.
"It was really impressive to personally see the ice—its incredible beauty and its sheer mass," she recalls of her time on the research vessel Polarstern.

 Ricarda Winkelmann of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Antarctica.
"If we burn it all, we melt it all," she said.
Credit Maria Martin/Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

To explore the long-term implications of global warming for Antarctica, Winkelmann teamed up with climate scientist Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford University, who attributes his interest in climate science in part to a 1979 New York Times article warning of "widespread floods" caused by the loss of South Pole ice.
Using a computer model developed by Andy Ridgwell of the University of Bristol that simulates how the atmosphere and ocean respond to increasing levels of greenhouse gases, the team fed rising temperatures from various amounts of total pollution into an ice sheet model developed by Anders Levermann of Potsdam University.
The simulation suggests how ice will flow and dwindle as it melts in response to temperature changes in the atmosphere and ocean, whether increased snowfall as a result of warming or the additional melting as a glacier loses height.
The researchers modeled carbon increases ranging from an additional 93 gigatons (representing another decade of fossil fuel consumption at the present rate) to as much as 12,000 gigatons (the total amount of carbon available from already discovered and recoverable deposits of coal, oil and natural gas) over the next few centuries.
A gigaton is equal to a billion metric tons of carbon, and current fossil fuel burning results in about 10 billion metric tons of carbon—10 gigatons—entering the atmosphere each year.


The simulations suggest that if another 500 gigatons of carbon end up in the atmosphere—an amount that would require a transition off fossil fuels by the end of this century—seas would rise by more than a meter within a thousand years.
In the worst-case scenario, wherein all the fossil fuels are burned over the next few centuries, the seas could rise as fast as three meters per century, and as much as 50 meters within 10,000 years—equivalent to the height of more than 50 Niagara Falls.
Not only is that unprecedented in the 10,000-odd years that human civilization has flourished, but it would doom coastal cities such as New York, Hamburg, Lagos, Shanghai, Sydney and Rio de Janeiro, where more than a billion people currently live.
"Each ten gigatons of carbon leads to more or less three centimeters of sea level rise in 1,000 years," Caldeira notes.

 Glaciers and mountains in West Antarctica are seen on Oct. 29, 2014,
during an Operation IceBridge research flight.
Credit: NASA/Michael Studinger

Like their human counterparts on coasts around the world, the inhabitants of Antarctica—seabirds, penguins and seals among them—would lose the ice that provides their only home.
While some of these animals might find homes in zoos, the majority of ice-dependent species would face potential extinction in the wild in the next millennium.
And speculative techniques to preserve the ice, such as lacing the stratosphere with sulfuric acid to mimic the cooling effect of a volcano, most likely will not help.
"Ice sheets, once they go, are hard to get back," says Caldeira, who has also studied such climate interventions, sometimes called geoengineering.

This animation shows the change in the mass of the Antarctic Ice Sheet between January 2004 and June 2014 as measured by the pair of GRACE satellites

It could already be too late to save portions of the ice in West Antarctica.
Recent research suggests that the ice sheets of the Amundsen Basin may have passed the point of no return as warmer ocean waters slip up under the vast glaciers.
Thus, even if no more excess carbon dioxide were to build up in the atmosphere, that ice would continue to melt.
As a result of that meltdown, along with the dwindling of Greenland's ice sheet and mountain glaciers and the expansion of warming seawater, rising sea levels—fast or slow—will be with us for millennia to come.

The simulation further revealed that if more than one trillion metric tons of carbon are dumped into the atmosphere, East Antarctica could face the same fate.
"What I was startled by was the speed at which the East Antarctic ice sheet could melt," Caldeira says.
"It took around 10,000 years for the big northern hemisphere ice sheet to melt at the end of the last ice age, so I assumed it would take 10,000 years to get substantial melt out of East Antarctica." Instead, extensive melting could take place within 200 years, depending on how much carbon is ultimately emitted.

However, if temperature increases can be held to no more than 2 degrees Celsius—roughly equivalent to another 500 gigatons of carbon, or one trillion metric tons in total—then sea level rise could top out at about two meters.

How these scenarios play out in the future will be profoundly affected by concrete regional infrastructure choices being made today.
The decision of which type of power plant to build today in Florida, for instance, could determine whether the majority of the state disappears underwater in a matter of centuries.
"Avoiding emissions is really the only practical path," Caldeira says.

By Mapping Specialists.Originally produced for "The Unquiet Ice,"
The simulations have practical implications for billions of coastal residents as well.
If the seas rise only slightly this century, one effective form of adaptation would be to build seawalls.
However, should sea levels swell at a rate of three centimeters a year, no seawall will suffice and coastal retreat becomes the more viable option.

An unstoppable meltdown could be in store for Antarctica's ice—and all of the other ice sheets around the globe—unless people stop dumping CO2 in the atmosphere like a sewer.
Carbon dioxide, once emitted, can remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years, trapping extra heat like a smothering blanket.
"It is much easier to know that an ice cube in a warming room is going to melt eventually than it is to say precisely how quickly it will vanish," Winkelmann says.
"I certainly hope that mankind will not choose to burn all fossil fuels, simply because I know how enormous the consequences will be."

Links :
  • NYTimes : Study Predicts Antarctica Ice Melt if All Fossil Fuels Are Burned
  • National Geographic : Just How Much Could the Sea Rise from Burning Fossil Fuels? A Lot.

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Saturday, September 12, 2015

The History of Cartography, the “Most Ambitious Overview of Map Making Ever,” now free online

The image above, appearing in Vol. 2, dates back to 1534.
It was created by Oronce Fine, the first chair of mathematics in the Collège Royal (aka the Collège de France), and it features the world mapped in the shape of a heart. Pretty great.

From OpenCulture by Dan Colman

Worth a quick mention: The University of Chicago Press has made available online — at no cost — the first three volumes of The History of Cartography.
Or what Edward Rothstein, of The New York Times, called “the most ambitious overview of map making ever undertaken.”
He continues:
People come to know the world the way they come to map it—through their perceptions of how its elements are connected and of how they should move among them. This is precisely what the series is attempting by situating the map at the heart of cultural life and revealing its relationship to society, science, and religion…. It is trying to define a new set of relationships between maps and the physical world that involve more than geometric correspondence. It is in essence a new map of human attempts to chart the world.
If you head over to this page, then look in the upper left, you will see links to three volumes (available in a free PDF format).
My suggestion would be to look at the gallery of color illustrations for each book, links to which you’ll find below.

Volume 1
Volume 2: Part 1
Volume 2: Part 2
Volume 2: Part 3
Volume 3: Part 1
Volume 3: Part 2

Note: If you buy Vol 1. on Amazon, it will run you $248. As beautiful as the book probably is, you’ll probably appreciate this free digital offering.

Links :

Friday, September 11, 2015

New international standards needed to manage ocean noise

 Humpback whales and tanker in Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary in Massachusetts Bay.
Green Fire Productions/Flickr

From Duke Univ

As governments and industries expand their use of high-decibel seismic surveys to explore the ocean bottom for resources, experts from eight universities and environmental organizations are calling for new global standards and mitigation strategies.

Their goal is to minimize the amount of sound the surveys produce and reduce risks the surveys and other underwater human poses to vulnerable marine life.

Firms and agencies conducting the surveys would benefit from these new measures, the experts assert, because instead of having to navigate an assortment of rules that vary by nation or region, they would have a uniform set of standards to follow.
"In recent years, we've seen an increase in the use of seismic surveys for and research, and for establishing national resource claims on ever-larger geographic scales. Surveys are now occurring in, or proposed for, many previously unexploited regions including parts of the Arctic Ocean and off the U.S. Atlantic coast," said Douglas P. Nowacek, an expert on marine ecology and bioacoustics at Duke University.
"The time has come for industries, governments, scientists and environmental organizations to work together to set practical guidelines to minimize the risks," he said.
Nowacek and his colleagues published their recommendations in a peer-reviewed paper today (Sept. 1) in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

 Two sperm whales "fluke-up" near the Texas A&M Research Vessel Gyre.

Seismic survey impulses are among the loudest noises humans put into the oceans, and in some cases can be detected more than 2,500 miles away.
The increase in ocean noise they cause can mask sounds whales and other species rely on to communicate, navigate, find food or avoid predators.
Long-term exposure to the noise can also lead to chronic stress and disorientation in animals, and auditory damage.
To reduce these risks, the new paper recommends that ocean noise be recognized globally as a pollutant - something the European Union already recognizes - and managed through a revision to the existing International Convention on the Prevention of Pollution from Ships.
This will allow the establishment of consistent, scientifically based standards and monitoring programs for ocean noise levels, Nowacek said.
Using empirical data from this monitoring and from ongoing field studies the convention would support, scientists could more thoroughly assess surveys' cumulative long-term impacts on marine life and identify areas where seismic activities should be prohibited or temporarily limited to protect important habitats or vulnerable populations.

 A rising tide of man-made noise is disrupting the lives of marine animals.

Wider use of multi-client surveys could also cut risks.
By collecting data simultaneously for two or more firms or agencies, these surveys significantly reduce the number of surveys required in a region, without forcing clients to share proprietary data. They've been successfully tested in Norway.


A rare and endangered blue whale offshore near Long Beach, Calif.
Dave McNew/Getty Images

Emerging technologies could further reduce a survey's acoustic footprint.
Many of these technologies, including the marine vibrator - which conducts surveys using a steady pulse of low-pressure sound waves over a longer period - are "not that far away from industrial scale use," Nowacek said.
The need to implement these new protective measures and scale up these technologies is urgent, he stressed. As sea ice in the Arctic Ocean rapidly diminishes, bordering nations are eyeing new underwater oil and gas exploration and research prospects there. Increased activity is also proposed for lower latitudes.
"Survey permits are now being considered for oil and gas exploration along the U.S. East Coast that would allow surveys to occur as close as three miles from the coast. However, the current draft of the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's five-year plan for East Coast oil and allows oil and gas lease areas to be no closer than 50 miles offshore. That's a pretty big difference," Nowacek said. "While gathering some data from beyond a lease area is necessary, allowing these industries to survey to within three miles of the coast is excessive."

Links :

Thursday, September 10, 2015

Seek-and-destroy robot to stop starfish killing the Great Barrier Reef

The venomous thorn-like spines that protect this starfish are the least of our problems - this species is destroying coral reefs in many parts of the world due to an imbalance in the oceans
source : Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation

From CNET by Michelle Starr

The Queensland University of Technology is developing an autonomous robot to deal with the one of the biggest threats to the Great Barrier Reef: Crown-of-Thorns Starfish.

The Great Barrier Reef, off the coast of Queensland, Australia, is dying.
However, while a great deal of the damage to the 344,400 square kilometres (133,000 square miles) of coral comes from climate change and pollution, one of the biggest threats comes from within: the Crown-of-Thorns Starfish, Acanthaster planci, which feeds on native coral.

 This animation shows the locations of Crown of Thorns Starfish (COTS) outbreaks
as measured over the last 30 years.
source : Dr Eric Lawrey, AIMS

In normal conditions, the venomous starfish feeds on faster-growing corals, which allows colonies of slower-growing corals to form, improving the diversity of a reef.
This is what occurs in other regions of the Indo-Pacific to which it is native.
But at the Great Barrier Reef, the starfish is a menace.
Every few years, the starfish's population explodes, leading to over a decade of havoc.
Three of these population explosions have been recorded over the last 50 years: 1962-1976; 1978-1990; and 1993-2005; and a new population observed in 2011 is believed to have been the vanguard of a new outbreak.
If not for these outbreaks, research from the Australian Institute of Marine Science predicts, coral cover would have increased in the last 30 years. Instead, it has declined by about 50 percent.

 Crown-of-Thorns Starfish off the coast of Indonesia.

What causes the Crown-of-Thorns Starfish population explosions is currently unknown, although it is believed that overfishing of the starfish's natural predators exacerbate them, and that destruction of predator habitat has led to declining predator numbers.
These are not easy to deal with.
Instead, a project from the Queensland University of Technology takes the direct approach.
Called the COTSbot (Crown-of-Thorns Starfish robot), it's designed to autonomously patrol and monitor the reefs without a tether, using robotic vision to find the starfish.
When it locates a Crown-of-Thorns starfish, it will administer a lethal injection of bile salts from a pneumatic arm.
This is not a pleasant death for the starfish.
It breaks out in blisters that burst open, exposing the internal organs.
This condition is infectious and can be passed to other Crown-of-Thorns starfish.
Infected starfish die within 24 hours, with a 100 percent mortality rate.
The robot, which has been in development for 10 years, completed its first sea trials in Queensland's Moreton Bay last week, testing its mechanical parts and navigation.

 Starfish have 20 seconds to comply.
This seek-and-destroy robot defends the Great Barrier Reef

"Human divers are doing an incredible job of eradicating this starfish from targeted sites but there just aren't enough divers to cover all the COTS hotspots across the Great Barrier Reef," said Matthew Dunbabin, who led the robot's creation at the QUT's Institute for Future Environments, in a statement.
"We see the COTSbot as a first responder for ongoing eradication programs -- deployed to eliminate the bulk of COTS in any area, with divers following a few days later to hit the remaining COTS.
The COTSbot becomes a real force multiplier for the eradication process the more of them you deploy -- imagine how much ground the programs could cover with a fleet of 10 or 100 COTSbots at their disposal, robots that can work day and night and in any weather condition."

The team has taken thousands of images and videos of the reef, and refined the COTSbot's stereoscopic vision system so that it can automatically and accurately detect the starfish. It currently has an accuracy rate of over 99 percent.
If it is uncertain that it has seen a Crown-of-Thorns Starfish, it will take a photo to be verified by a human. That data will then be incorporated into its memory bank.
The robot is designed to operate within a metre of the seafloor, and can cruise for up to eight hours at a time, with the capacity to deliver 200 injections.
Its ability to do so will be tested on the Great Barrier Reef later this month, accompanied by human researchers, who will verify the identified starfish before the robot is allowed to deliver any injections.
The autonomous work of the robot is then scheduled to begin in December.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Going deep: Cautious steps toward seabed mining

So far, the International Seabed Authority has issued 26 exploratory leases in sections of “the Area”—the vast international seabed that lies outside individual countries’ borders 
(indicated on the map in gray).
The exploratory leases issued to date cover approximately 2 million km2 of seabed.
No exploitation leases have been issued yet. 
(map : Jane Whitney)

From EHP by Charles W. Schmidt

The deep ocean was once assumed to be lifeless and barren.
Today we know that even the deepest waters teem with living creatures, some of them thought to be little changed from when life itself first appeared on the planet.
The deep ocean is also essential to the earth’s biosphere—it regulates global temperatures, stores carbon, provides habitat for countless species, and cycles nutrients for marine food webs.

The ocean floor is home to a wealth of species, some of which—such as this bamboo coral (Isidella tentaculum)—have only recently been discovered.
Proponents of seabed mining claim it causes less ecological damage than terrestrial extraction.
But some researchers are concerned that seabed mining could overwhelm deep-sea ecosystems, adding to concerns about the health of the oceans.
© NOAA

Currently stressed by pollution, industrial fishing, and oil and gas development, these cold, dark waters now face another challenge: mining.
With land-based mineral sources in decline, seabeds offer a new and largely untapped frontier for mineral extraction, and companies are gearing up to mine a treasure trove of copper, zinc, gold, manganese, and other minerals from the ocean floor.

Scientists, regulators, and mining companies are now collaborating on frameworks and strategies for mining the seabed responsibly.
Cindy Van Dover, director of the Duke University Marine Laboratory and chair of the school’s Division of Marine Science and Conservation, says that’s encouraging, given that seabed mining appears to be inevitable.

“There’s been a lot of engagement on the environmental side,” Van Dover says.
“A hundred years from now, people will look back and ask if we got this right. We need to be sure that we do.”

Copper grades, or the percentage of copper per unit of mined substrate, have declined with steadily rising extraction, from a high of 10–20% during the late nineteenth century to less than 1% today.
By contrast, copper grades in seabeds slated for exploitation in 2018 by the Canadian mining company Nautilus Minerals, lying under 1,600 m of water off Papua New Guinea, average 7.2%.5 It’s estimated that 500 billion metric tons of polymetallic nodules—mineral clumps loaded with varying levels of manganese, cobalt, nickel, and copper—lie scattered under waters up to 6,000 m deep in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans.6

Proponents of seabed mining assert that extracting minerals from the deep ocean will inflict less environmental damage than mining on land, which displaces communities, removes entire ecosystems, exacerbates erosion, and pollutes groundwater, rivers, and streams.
But according to Craig Smith, a professor of biological oceanography at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, seabed mining will also stir up vast plumes of sediments, some of which could resettle over areas much larger than the mine sites themselves.
Scientists worry the plumes could cause widespread ecological damage and kill off deep-sea fauna that they know little about.
Without appropriate regulations, they say, seabed mining will further erode the ocean’s capacity to provide essential ecological services, adding to what are already acute concerns for the ocean’s overall health.

“Deep-ocean ecosystems can be incredibly fragile,” Smith says.
“And it’s possible that after the mining starts, huge areas could be impacted before any one of them has a chance to bounce back.”



ISA in the Decision Seat

To a large extent, environmental prospects for seabed mining hinge on the deliberations of a group called the International Seabed Authority (ISA).
The ISA was created by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a treaty ratified by most of the world’s nations (although not by the United States).
The UNCLOS governs the use and protection of seabed resources.
Within that context, the ISA has a mandate to organize, regulate, and control all mineral-related activities in what’s known as “the Area,” or the international seabed lying beyond the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of specific countries.
Any coastal nation may claim an EEZ up to 200 nautical miles (370 km) off the country’s shore, within which the country is responsible for regulating mining.8

The UNCLOS defines the Area as a “common heritage of mankind” that is not subject to direct claims by sovereign states.
The ISA administers this heritage by issuing mining leases in the Area to countries or corporations that will, in turn, be obligated to pay mining royalties back to the ISA.
Because the royalties will come from mining a “common heritage,” the ISA will then redistribute the money to countries in the developing world using procedural mechanisms that are still being developed.

Given the inherent tension between the ISA’s dual mandates to collect and distribute royalties from mining licenses and to protect the marine environment, skeptics have described the organization as a “fox in the henhouse.”
Michael Lodge, the ISA’s legal counsel and deputy to its secretary-general, responds that “the system is full of checks and balances, with different interest groups in different chambers.”

Before the UNCLOS came into force in 1994, a so-called pioneer regime was established under the United Nations with the authority to issue “pioneer claims” to enterprises that had already invested in minerals exploration.
Lodge says six pioneer claims for minerals exploration were issued in 1984, each totaling an area of 75,000 km2.
Those claims transferred into official leases when the ISA became a legal entity 10 years later.

Between 1984 and 2011, Lodge says, the ISA issued no further leases, but then the numbers started surging, coincident with completion by the ISA of regulations for exploration.
According to Lodge, the ISA has so far issued 26 exploratory leases covering a total of approximately 2 million km2 of seabed.
Exploitation leases to actually extract minerals will follow when the corresponding regulations are final.

According to Maurice Tivey, a geologist and senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, two converging factors are driving the spike in exploration.
One of them is technological innovation leveraged from the oil and gas industries, which are migrating steadily toward the deep ocean.
The other factor is a projected surge in demand especially for copper, but also for other minerals, including “rare earth” minerals used in hybrid car components, smart phones, computers, solar panels, and many other electronic devices.
Duncan Currie, a legal and political advisor with the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, says countries and corporations are taking a long view on seabed mining, anticipating mineral shortages and higher prices that will eventually make the practice cost-effective.

Polymetallic nodules—seen here with Psychropotes longicauda, a species of sea cucumber—dot the abyssal plains that cover nearly two-thirds of the earth’s surface.
These are some of the several billion metric tons of recoverable nodules estimated to lie in the Clarion–Clipperton Fracture Zone.
© Lenaick LEP (image license available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode)


Types of Deep-Sea Minerals

Desirable minerals are found in three types of seabed deposits.
Located in comparatively shallower waters 1,500–2,500 m deep, the most accessible deposits are called seafloor massive sulfides (SMS).
They occur where seawater percolates down through fissures in the earth’s crust—at volcanically active zones called midocean ridges (where tectonic plates diverge) and at submarine volcanic chains.
Cold seawater reacts with hot rock beneath these geologic features, resulting in hydrothermal vents that spew super-heated fluids into the water column.
In some cases, hydrothermal vents appear as “black smokers,” chimney-like structures discharging dark clouds of sulfur-bearing material that accumulates into SMS deposits.
These deposits typically contain high levels of copper and zinc, as well as gold and silver.

Polymetallic nodules are much more widespread deposits.
They are spread across the abyssal plains, which cover an estimated 60% of the earth’s surface.
These vast, flat expanses of the ocean floor lie an average of 3,000–4,000 m underwater.
Eighty percent of the exploratory leases for these nodules are located in a vast region called the Clarion–Clipperton Fracture Zone (CCZ), which extends from Mexico to Hawaii and ranges from 4,000 to 5,000 m in depth.
The CCZ is estimated to contain several billion metric tons of recoverable nodules, each roughly 5–10 cm in size, lying half-buried on the seafloor.

Cobalt-rich crusts make up the third class of seabed mineral deposits.
These crusts are found on undersea mountains, or “seamounts,” in shallower waters; most of the mineable crusts are at a depth of 700–2,500 m. Cobalt crusts are formed in areas where iron and manganese has precipitated from seawater over millions of years.
They’re also loaded with cobalt, nickel, tellurium, and rare earth metals that aggregate in concentrated layers up to 25 cm thick on hard rock surfaces.11

The different mineral types are surrounded by a variety of fauna.
Some SMS sites have low biodiversity, but others are populated by a rich assemblage of species, including tubeworms, clams, snails, shrimp, crabs, and cold-water corals.
The bacteria and other single-celled organisms at the bottom of hydrothermal vent food chains are chemosynthetic, meaning they derive energy from oxidation of inorganic molecules instead of from sunlight, as occurs with photosynthesis.
“It’s possible that all life on earth emerged from these hydrothermal systems,” says Richard Steiner, a marine conservation biologist and consultant based in Anchorage, Alaska.
“And since there are only [an estimated] five hundred to five thousand hydrothermal vent systems in the world ocean,13 each one averaging a square kilometer each, they’re also extremely rare.”

Scientists point out that SMS ecosystems evolved to recover quickly from violent disturbances. Indeed, the Solwara 1 site lies within 500 m of an active volcano that, according to unpublished findings from Tivey and colleagues, deposited 6 million tons of fresh sediments between 2005 and 2011.
However, mining has also been proposed for inactive vent sites, which may have lost some of this resiliency and thus may be likely to recover much more slowly, says Lisa Levin, a professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

Scientists know little about the benthic (deep-sea) species residing in the abyssal plains, but what they’re learning shows them to be highly adapted to an extreme environment, where temperatures hover just above freezing and pressures become crushing.
Studies show much of the fauna to be limited in size, slow to mature and with low rates of metabolism, reproduction, and colonization.3

Moreover, the addition of new sediments in abyssal plains depends on the gradual rain of particles from the sea surface.
These include the remains of dead plankton and other organisms, plus tiny amounts of wind-blown grains of inorganic minerals, mainly quartz.
New sediments accumulate in abyssal plains at an average rate of just 2–3 cm per thousand years, according to Philip Weaver, managing director of Seascape Consultants, Ltd., in Romsey, United Kingdom.
And in the deepest plains, he says, it’s even lower, perhaps 0.5–1 cm over the same time scale.

According to Smith of the University of Hawai‘i, the sluggish biology and low rates of sedimentation virtually ensure that abyssal plain ecosystems won’t recover from mining for hundreds of years. Evidence supporting that view is already available: In 1978, scientists performing an experiment scooped polymetallic nodules from the CCZ and left a track in the sediments that was 1.5 km wide and 4.5 cm deep.
When a different research team returned to the same site 26 years later, the track was still clearly visible, analogous to the footsteps left by astronauts on the moon.
What’s more, nematode populations in the track were still disturbed, with the abundance and diversity significantly lower than in adjacent areas where nodules had not been removed.

By contrast, the seamounts where cobalt crusts are found tend to be high in biological productivity, Levin says.
“The physics is such that you have a lot of water motion, and that favors the growth of corals and fish,” she explains.
But these ecosystems also grow slowly, she says; some fish can be more than 100 years old.
“At this stage,” Levin says, “we expect these ecosystems will also recover slowly from disturbances.”

SMS deposits form around hydrothermal vents known as black smokers. 
The dark “smoke” is actually fluid expelled from the vents; minerals in this fluid settle around the base of the vent mound. 
This black smoker is located in the Eastern Manus Basin off Papua New Guinea.
©  Photo courtesy of Maurice Tivey and the WHOI Deep Submergence Laboratory, 
Cruise Manus 2006 with ROV Jason-2

Exploitation

Cobalt crusts, being stuck to rock, could be challenging to remove.
Miners will have to somehow recover the crusts without collecting too much rocky substrate, which would dilute the quality of the ore.
According to the ISA, only the Japanese have invested substantially in technologies to recover cobalt crusts.
Elsewhere, the technology remains in its infancy.

Substrate challenges are less daunting at SMS sites, where remotely operated vehicles will grind and cut their way through mineral deposits up to 30 m thick.
These sites also have a relatively small footprint. Nautilus Minerals’ site off Papua New Guinea, for instance, called Solwara 1, reaches 20–25 m into the seabed, yet the site occupies only 0.11–0.14 km2 of ocean floor, says Renee Grogan, the company’s environment manager.
Grogan says that compared with terrestrial mining, “this is a very small footprint for what we anticipate will be a very large yield of ore.”

SMS core samples await geologic analysis in a Japanese laboratory. Deep-sea deposits can be rich sources of precious metals, rare earths, and other valuable minerals.
© Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Polymetallic nodules, meanwhile, will be “vacuumed” from the top 5–10 cm of sediment on the seafloor.
According to the ISA, polymetallic nodules are only profitable when the yield exceeds 10 kg/m2.
By one estimate, a profitable site will mine 1 km2 of the seafloor every day, and a mature industry will disrupt up to 12,000 km2 around the world every year.
“But then again,” Smith says, “abyssal plains are probably the most widely distributed ecosystems on the planet. So the percentage impacted may be quite small, especially if [extraction is] well managed.”

Regardless of where it occurs, seabed mining will stir up some amount of sediment, creating plumes that in some cases could fall out over areas larger than the mine sites themselves.
These plumes could have a variety of potential impacts.
Plumes released near the surface may reduce light penetration and temperature and thus impair plankton growth, with rippling effects on the food web.
Sediment also might smother benthic organisms as it settles, particularly those living in abyssal plains, which never evolved to cope with such large amounts of sediment sinking from above.

Furthermore, the plumes could be toxic, especially those generated from mining SMS sites, which, according to Duke’s Van Dover, may liberate harmful levels of lead, arsenic, copper, and other elements that were once trapped in the deposits.
Van Dover points out that copper is an antifouling agent—“if it’s mobilized in the water,” she says, “then organisms will have to fight off the effects of the contamination.”

Plumes in some locations could have lesser impacts.
According to Grogan, modeling suggests that plumes generated from mining Solwara 1 will deposit within 600 m of the extraction zone, making it “a very small off-site impact.”
She adds that Solwara 1 is located next to an active volcano, which produces a significant plume of its own, reducing the impact of mining on organisms that have already adapted to these eruptions.

Nautilus Minerals plans to mine SMS deposits using various cutting and collection tools on the seafloor.
A slurry of minerals and seawater will be pumped to the surface via a riser and lifting system.
The slurry will be dewatered aboard a support vessel and the recovered minerals shipped to shore.
In an effort to limit potential ecological impacts, the filtered water will be returned to the seafloor through the riser pipes, providing hydraulic power to the pump as it goes.
© Nautilus Minerals

One research program that’s now studying the possible ecotoxicological effects of seabed mining plumes is MIDAS (Managing Impacts of Deep-Sea Resource Exploitation).
Funded by a three-year grant from the European Commission, MIDAS conducts broad-based research in a number of areas with the aim of developing best practices for the deep-sea mining industry.

According to Nélia Mestre, a postdoctoral research assistant at the University of Algarve, Portugal, who works with the program, much about how the plumes could affect life in the deep ocean remains unknown.
High pressure and low temperatures might influence the bioavailability of toxic elements, she says, and deep-sea species may be either less or more susceptible to plume toxicity than species in shallower waters.

“The tolerance difference could go both ways,” Mestre explains.
“For instance, SMS species are adapted to chemicals released by black smokers at levels that could be toxic to shallow-water species.
We hope that by the end of the MIDAS project we will have an indication of the potential hazard of chemicals present in plumes to local fauna in comparison to shallow-water fauna.”

Cobalt crusts, seen here with colonies of bubblegum coral (Paragorgia arborea) at a depth of 350 m, are found on undersea mountains swept by high currents.
Japan is the only country that has invested substantially in technologies to extract these deposits.
© NOAA

A Framework for Protection

During its July 2015 session, which ran for two weeks in Kingston, Jamaica, the ISA began to consider a draft framework for the exploitation of seabed resources.
Also in July, Smith and 10 colleagues published a paper in Science recommending a precautionary approach to seabed mining that would emphasize the creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), and calling on the ISA to “[suspend] further approval of exploration contracts (and not approve exploitation contracts) until MPA networks are designed and implemented for each target region.”8 Smith argues that MPA networks are needed to guarantee that a significant proportion of the global deep-sea ecosystem remains intact and viable.

A provisional environmental management plan protecting roughly 1.4 million km2 was established for the CCZ by the ISA in 2012.
However, an environmental management plan has not been established for regions of the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic oceans, where the ISA continues to issue exploration leases.

These octocorals live at a depth of 1,500 m in the Gulf of Mexico.
The ocean is an essential regulator of the earth’s biosphere, and its deepest waters likely hold direct human health benefits in the form of yet-undiscovered therapeutic substances.
Of the researchers studying these waters, Cindy Van Dover says, “We are a new breed of scientists who think about the environmental management of a place that covers most of the planet, a place most people don’t think about from one day to the next.”
And while the seafloor still holds many mysteries, Van Dover adds, “What we do know is that the health of the planet depends upon the health of the ocean.”
© NOAA

Smith and his coauthors are concerned that MPAs might be spaced too far apart, without the connectivity needed to prevent localized extinctions.
“We don’t want to be overly critical of the ISA, but they really need to get these regional MPA plans in place soon,” he says.
“Exploration claims in the CCZ are already compromising our ability to create MPAs in some areas.”

In response, Lodge counters, “There is no basis for either suspending contracts or placing a moratorium on exploration, since exploration provides the only means for gathering environmental data. A suspension of exploration would be self-defeating.”

According to Lodge, the ISA is now reaching “saturation on exploration leases.”
He says there are perhaps 10 other promising areas that haven’t been leased for exploration yet, but the industry appears to be consolidating around a limited number of projects.
If exploitation ultimately succeeds in these areas, he says, then deep-sea mining is likely to experience a huge amount of growth.

The hope among scientists and other environmental stakeholders is that this growth is matched by successful efforts to protect key habitats.
Van Dover says these efforts might focus especially on protecting thermal vent communities, which she describes as “beautiful, rare, and important.”

Smith views potential extinctions in moral terms, pointing out that “the deep sea is raw material for evolution—large-scale extinctions would profoundly affect what makes our planet unique.”
And like other endangered habitats, such as tropical rainforests, the deep ocean likely harbors untapped biological resources that might one day be used to develop new drugs and other products that benefit humankind.
“We’re talking about the largest and least understood biome on earth,” says Steiner.
“And right now very little of it is protected.”

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

An act of extraordinary, underwater DIY

Week under water (British Pathe film)

From BBC by Dave McMullan

Fifty years ago, two young diving enthusiasts undertook an extraordinary act of DIY, building a capsule in which they could live at the bottom of the sea.
It was a symbol of an optimistic age.

The Breakwater Fort has stood guard at the mouth of Plymouth Sound for almost 150 years.
Its forbidding stone walls have seen a lot of maritime history, but perhaps no episode more intriguing than the Glaucus Project.
It was September 1965.
The Sixties were swinging.
The Rolling Stones were at number one.
The world was changing and anything seemed possible.

Colin Irwin, 19, and his friend John Heath, were both divers from Bournemouth and Poole Sub Aqua Club.
They were inspired by a series of big-money experiments in underwater living.
Jacques Cousteau created three Conshelf - short for Continental Shelf Station - underwater habitation and research stations at a depth of 100m (328ft) and funded by the French oil industry.

The Undersea World of Jacques Cousteau 19 Conshelf Adventure

The American Navy's SEALAB I, on the seabed off the coast of Bermuda at a depth of 58m, held four divers for 11 days until an approaching storm cut the project short.

The Story of Sealab I

The two young British divers decided to have a go themselves.
Irwin, now 69, was convinced it was the way forward: "We all thought at the time, 'Well, this is the future. We may not populate the Moon, but we're going to have villages all over the continental shelf, and we thought it's about time the British did the same thing'."

It took months of work to scrape together the £1,000 budget to build the Glaucus habitat.
"One of the club members, his dad owned a shipyard, so we had someone who could actually make the underwater house on the cheap. So we were able to put it all together and get the job done," says Irwin.

Divers outside the Glaucus habitat

Documents and letters from the time, though, show how tight the money was.
The team had to beg the company supplying them with oxygen to let them have it for nothing.
But it was that shoestring budget that earned Glaucus its place in history.

Where Cousteau and the US Navy had been able to use huge compressors to pump oxygen down into their habitats, Irwin and his team simply could not afford that.
Their solution was a world first.
"We had to analyze the atmosphere, see what the oxygen level was, what the carbon dioxide level was and put out soda lime to absorb the CO2 and top it up with oxygen bottles. So by virtue of economics, we became the first underwater home with a self-contained atmosphere," says Irwin.

The Glaucus was towed into place on 19 September by a tugboat and lowered 11m down between the Breakwater and the Fort, where the waters would be calmer.

The Glaucus Habitat :
Metal cylinder weighing 1.8 tonnes, and measuring 3.7m, and 2.1m in diameter
Ballasted with pig iron and sections of railway line, weighing some 14,000kg
Container included a foldable table and two bunks, giving aquanauts free floor space of 2m x 1.4m

The finished habitat was a cylinder tank, made of steel, which weighed in at two tonnes and was 3.7m long and 2.1m high - just enough room to walk around.
Once Irwin and Heath were inside, they kept in contact by phone to a team stationed on the fort but apart from that, they were on their own.
Quarters were close, it was very cold and 100% humid - and the tank was open to the sea at the bottom through a hatch.

Irwin remembers it was quite a change from a normal dive.
"What was psychologically different about it was that normally if you get into trouble, you want to get up to the boat or dry land. But after we'd been down there 24 hours, we were on what's called a full saturation dive. Our fatty tissues were full of dissolved nitrogen. If we'd made an emergency ascent, we'd have got the bends."

 
The Glaucus being winched into Sutton Harbour

Nipping out for a "number two" toilet break was something of a challenge.
The aquanauts had to restrict themselves to only going every couple of days as they had to go through a hatch to a separate compartment, so their living area wouldn't get contaminated.
Luxury living it was not - but they survived the week.

It's an achievement that is still respected, says Dr John Bevan, chairman of the Historical Diving Society, who runs the National Diving Museum in Gosport.
"It's the fact that it was an amateur experiment, and so successful, in terrible conditions. It wasn't the Mediterranean or the Red Sea or California. It was cold and damp and probably the most difficult of all the underwater living experiments."

Back on dry land, Colin Irwin started work on designing a larger capsule and tried to find funding from the government and industry.
But what the Cousteau and American experiments had showed was that the dream of creating underwater living was too expensive and risky.
The '60s dream of underwater villages alongside dry land started to fade.

Irwin himself moved on to develop a career promoting peace around the world, working in Northern Ireland and the Middle East.
He now works at Liverpool University but has lost touch with his fellow aquanaut John Heath.

The Glaucus capsule itself came to a rather sad end.
It now lies just off the Breakwater Fort about 13m below the surface where it's quietly rotting, listing on its remaining legs.
Divers regularly go down to see it for themselves, and Colin himself went back for the first time over the summer with the BBC's Inside Out South West.

The underwater home can't be salvaged now as it is too badly damaged but it has been given a new lease of life.

The Human Interface Technologies Team at the University of Birmingham has been working for some time on creating a virtual reality seascape of Plymouth Sound, the final resting place of many wrecks.

The latest addition to this Virtual Heritage is a computer-generated dive down to, and inside, the Glaucus itself.
Prof Bob Stone, from the university's Human Interface Technologies Team, is leading the project.
"We're going for realism with this project," he says.
"We can get very detailed images indeed especially with the games technology we're using. So we can simulate turbid water, particles in the water, lighting effects underwater."

Glaucus capsule VR

It has been a long and painstaking process to build the virtual reality.
Bob's team used the original plans, as well as high-definition close-up and aerial photographs of the Breakwater, and sound recordings to make the recreation as realistic as possible.
"We're hoping eventually to put the simulation on a smartphone or tablet or to download as an app to show schoolchildren, particularly those in Plymouth who've got no idea that this kind of history is on their doorstep."

Colin Irwin visited Birmingham to take the first virtual trip down memory lane.
"They've got it spot on, the height, the dimensions. At one point I put my hand out to brace myself as I was getting up from the virtual reality hatch and, of course, there was nothing there."

The Glaucus itself may have come to a watery end - something Irwin regrets - but thanks to some technological wizardry, perhaps a little bit of that pioneering spirit lives on.

Links :
  • TED : Fabien Cousteau: What I learned from spending 31 days underwater

Monday, September 7, 2015

Drone ships move closer to reality as Inmarsat gets on board

Crew of landlubbers: Autonomous ships will be controlled from the shore
when they are not navigating themselves

From TheTelegraph by Alan Tovey

Satellite communications group Inmarsat signs up to research project investigating how to build drone ships which can sail without a crew 

ADVERTISING
Shipping could be revolutionized by automatic cargo ships navigating the world’s oceans, only checking in with shore-based operators in emergencies.
Removing humans from long voyages would cut the cost of operating ships – crew can represent a third of a ship's running costs – and allow them to carry more cargo in the space normally taken up by people.
Inmarsat will provide expertise in data transfer and communications to the Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications (AAWA) initiative, with drone ships’ ability to stay in contact with land bases while out on the oceans being seen as key to their viability.


Global Xpress: Changing the future for us all
Hear from Inmarsat’s CEO and technology experts as we begin our transformational connectivity journey that is Global Xpress.
See how we are meeting people’s expectations to be connected wherever they go through our next-generation satellite broadband service, to bring faster speeds and higher capacity on land, at sea and in the air.

Last month Inmarsat launched its third Global Xpress satellite providing high-speed broadband connections from space, and when this satellite - located 22,000 miles above the Pacific - comes into service at the end of the year it will complete the FTSE 100’s company’s worldwide network.
This will mean that there will be no “coverage blackspots” on any of the world’s seas where drone ships would lose contact with their human operators, meaning they have constant and virtually real-time connections.

 How autonomous ships will work

“The Global Xpress mobile broadband network is a turning point for the future of the maritime industry and lends itself to the AAWA initiative,” said Ronald Spithout, Inmarsat’s maritime president, adding that satellite broadband is “fundamental” to autonomous ships.
“Global Xpress is the last big piece in the puzzle to bring about drone ships, although many other aspects need to be fleshed out, such as the legal and who is liable if something goes wrong.”
While the AAWA programme, which is being led by fellow blue chip Rolls-Royce, is still in its early stages, Inmarsat expects the research to produce spin-off technology which should boost its revenues before the first experimental drone ship makes its maiden voyage – something expected to occur within 10 years.
Mr Spithout said: “Before we get fully autonomous ships, there should be increased demand for maritime satellite broadband traffic as companies develop applications such as remotely monitoring cargo.”

Oskar Levander, Rolls-Royce’s president of marine innovation said that while much of the technology required for drone ships is available today, it is integrating it and developing the systems to operate unmanned vessels that is the next step.
“This gives us the chance to redefine what a ship really is,” he said.
“How it looks, how it operates and how efficient it is.”

Autonomous ships are increasingly catching the imagination of shipping companies looking for economies.
While crews could still be needed for complex operations such as docking, when a ship is in the open ocean they have little to do other than navigate and monitor systems, tasks which can easily be automated.
Crews could be ferried on and off to handle docking, or airlifted to a ship which runs into trouble or needs repairs.
Removing humans would also reduce the price of shipbuilding, with no need for heating and water systems, which add complexity and cost.
With no need for these systems, the amount of power a ship needs would be reduced, making them more efficient – a vital factor as regulation forces ships to reduce pollution.

 Without the need for facilites to house a human crew, ships could look very different

A single captain at a central base could also control several ships at a time, further reducing costs.
The threat of piracy could also be reduced, with ships being designed so they are harder to board or computer control meaning they can be shut off remotely, hampering criminals.
Mr Spithout added: “Without a crew on board, who is there for pirates to hijack?”
He added that cyber security would also need to be improved to prevent ships systems being hacked.
The AAWA project is being financed by Tekes, Finland’s technical research funding agency.

Links :

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Sea lion in a fishing net

Video shot in 600ft (185m)
GoPro Hero3 and 4's were used along with extreme depth camera housings/lights
manufactured by GroupBinc.com.

This video was shot during while trawling a highly modified net.
This net was made specifically to sort juvenile fish from mature fish.
This selection process reduces by-catch to virtually nothing.
Of all the fish that you see coming into the net (overall about 50K lbs), only 10% were kept (bigger mature), while the others swam through the net unscathed.

Furthermore, this new design reduces bottom contact by 95%.
In this experiment, the trawler made 10 passes with the new net.
A ROV was then deployed to record the damage.
Several times, the ROV crew had to double check their position as there was no damage to the seafloor.
It wasn't until they got on the edge of the path that there was a slight 6cm depression, the width of the barndoor.
Needless to say, this new net could revolutionize global commercial fishing.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

The Coral Sea particularly sensitive sea area

The Coral Sea is considered one of the most distinctive and undisturbed natural systems in the world.
It is home to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park which was made a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) for shipping by the International Maritime Organization in 1990.
In order to protect this vulnerable region the Australian Maritime Safety Authority has taken a proposal to the International Maritime Organization to extend the existing PSSA into the Coral Sea.
The new area will cover approximately 564,000 square kilometers of the Coral Sea and includes a number of shipping hazards not covered by the current arrangements.
The extension provides a means of protecting the unique physical, ecological and heritage values of the Coral Sea while having a minimal impact on international shipping.

The Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait Vessel Traffic Service (REEFVTS) is a joint operation between AMSA and Maritime Safety Queensland.
The system monitors and manages the thousands of ships travelling through the area each year.
The system is designed to prevent vessels running aground and damaging the world heritage area. 

Friday, September 4, 2015

U.S. is playing catch-up with Russia in scramble for the Arctic


From NYTimes by Steven Lee Mayers

ABOARD COAST GUARD CUTTER ALEX HALEY, in the Chukchi Sea —
With warming seas creating new opportunities at the top of the world, nations are scrambling over the Arctic — its territorial waters, transit routes and especially its natural resources — in a rivalry some already call a new Cold War.

 A New Race for the Arctic 
The warming climate has transformed a region once largely bound by ice, now sought after for territory, transit routes and natural resources.

When President Obama travels to Alaska on Monday, becoming the first president to venture above the Arctic Circle while in office, he hopes to focus attention on the effects of climate change on the Arctic.
Some lawmakers in Congress, analysts, and even some government officials say the United States is lagging behind other nations, chief among them Russia, in preparing for the new environmental, economic and geopolitical realities facing the region.

“We have been for some time clamoring about our nation’s lack of capacity to sustain any meaningful presence in the Arctic,” said Adm. Paul F. Zukunft, the Coast Guard’s commandant.

Aboard the Alex Haley, the increased activity in the Arctic was obvious in the deep blue waters of the Chukchi Sea.
While the cutter patrolled one day this month, vessels began to appear one after another on radar as this ship cleared the western edge of Alaska and cruised north of the Arctic Circle.

There were three tugs hauling giant barges to ExxonMobil’s onshore natural gasproject east of Prudhoe Bay.
To the east, a flotilla of ships and rigs lingered at the spot where Royal Dutch Shell began drilling for oil this month.
Not far away, across America’s maritime border, convoys of container ships and military vessels were traversing the route that Russia dreams of turning into a new Suez Canal.

The cutter, a former Navy salvage vessel built nearly five decades ago, has amounted to the government’s only asset anywhere nearby to respond to an accident, oil spill or incursion into America’s territory or exclusive economic zone in the Arctic.

To deal with the growing numbers of vessels sluicing north through the Bering Strait, the Coast Guard has had to divert ships like the Alex Haley from other core missions, like policing American fisheries and interdicting drugs.
The service’s fleet is aging, especially the nation’s only two icebreakers.
 (The United States Navy rarely operates in the Arctic.)
Underwater charting is paltry, while telecommunications remain sparse above the highest latitudes. Alaska’s far north lacks deepwater port facilities to support increased maritime activity.

All these shortcomings require investments that political gridlock, budget constraints and bureaucracy have held up for years.

Russia planted a titanium flag on the Arctic seabed in 2007.
Russian Polar explorers, Associated Press

Russia, by contrast, is building 10 new search-and-rescue stations, strung like a necklace of pearls at ports along half of the Arctic shoreline.
More provocatively, it has also significantly increased its military presence, reopening bases abandoned after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Russia is far from the only rival — or potential one — in the Arctic. China, South Korea and Singapore have increasingly explored the possibility that commercial cargo could be shipped to European markets across waters — outside Russia’s control — that scientists predict could, by 2030, be ice-free for much of the summer.

In 2012, with great fanfare, China sent a refurbished icebreaker, the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon, across one such route.
Signaling its ambitions to be a “polar expedition power,” China is now building a second icebreaker, giving it an icebreaking fleet equal to America’s. Russia, by far the largest Arctic nation, has 41 in all.

“The United States really isn’t even in this game,” Admiral Zukunft said at a conference in Washington this year.
He lamented the lack of urgency in Washington, contrasting it with the challenges of the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union confronted each other in the Arctic and beyond.
“When Russia put Sputnik in outer space, did we sit with our hands in pocket with great fascination and say, ‘Good for Mother Russia’?”

 This map shows Russia's dominant militarization of the Arctic

Polar Opposites

“The Arctic is one of our planet’s last great frontiers,” Mr. Obama declared when he introduced a national strategy for the region in May 2013.
The strategy outlined the challenges and opportunities created by diminishing sea ice — from the harsh effects on wildlife and native residents to the accessibility of oil, gas and mineral deposits, estimated by the United States Geological Survey to include 13 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and 30 percent of its natural gas.

In January, the president created an Arctic Executive Steering Committee, led by the director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology, John P. Holdren.
The committee is trying to prioritize the demands for ships, equipment and personnel at a time of constrained budgets.

Dr. Holdren said in an interview that administration officials were trying “to get our arms around matching the resources and the commitment we can bring to bear with the magnitude of the opportunities and the challenges” in the Arctic.

What kind of frontier the Arctic will be — an ecological preserve or an economic engine, an area of international cooperation or confrontation — is now the question at the center of the unfolding geopolitical competition.
An increasing divergence over the answer has deeply divided the United States and its allies on one side and Russia on the other.

 A Russian research team in the arctic evacuates the drifting scientific seasonal station 'North Pole' on August 8 in Murmansk region, Russia.
After a Russian team placed their nations flag on the ocean floor beneath the north pole, many have feared arctic nations may soon start a land grab for territory and natural resources.
Alexander Petrosyan/Kommersant photo/ Getty

Since returning to the Kremlin for a third term in 2012, President Vladimir V. Putin has sought to restore Russia’s pre-eminence in its northern reaches — economically and militarily — with zeal that a new report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies compared to the Soviet Union’s efforts to establish a “Red Arctic” in the 1930s.
The report’s title echoed the rising tensions caused by Russia’s actions in the Arctic: “The New Ice Curtain.”

Decades of cooperation in the Arctic Council, which includes Russia, the United States and six other Arctic states, all but ended with Moscow’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the continuing war in eastern Ukraine.
In March, Russia conducted an unannounced military exercise that was one of the largest ever in the far north.
It involved 45,000 troops, as well as dozens of ships and submarines, including those in its strategic nuclear arsenal, from the Northern Fleet, based in Murmansk.

The first of two new army brigades — each expected to grow to more than 3,600 soldiers — deployed to a military base only 30 miles from the Finnish border.
The other will be deployed on the Yamal Peninsula, where many of Russia’s new investments in energy resources on shore are. Mr. Putin has pursued the buildup as if a 2013 protest by Greenpeace International at the site of Russia’s first offshore oil platform above the Arctic Circle was the vanguard of a more ominous invader.


“Oil and gas production facilities, loading terminals and pipelines should be reliably protected from terrorists and other potential threats,” Mr. Putin said when detailing the military buildup last year.
“Nothing can be treated as trivial here.”

In Washington and other NATO capitals, Russia’s military moves are seen as provocative — and potentially destabilizing.

In the wake of the conflict in Ukraine, Russia has intensified air patrols probing NATO’s borders, including in the Arctic.
In February, Norwegian fighter jets intercepted six Russian aircraft off Norway’s northern tip.
Similar Russian flights occurred last year off Alaska and in the Beaufort Sea, prompting American and Canadian jets to intercept them.
Russia’s naval forces have also increased patrols, venturing farther into Arctic waters.
Of particular concern, officials said, has been Russia’s deployment of air defenses in the far north, including surface-to-air missiles whose main purpose is to counter aerial incursions that only the United States or NATO members could conceivably carry out in the Arctic.

“We see the Arctic as a global commons,” a senior Obama administration official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss matters of national security.
“It’s not apparent the Russians see it the same way we do.”

Russia has also sought to assert its sovereignty in the Arctic through diplomacy.
This month, Russia resubmitted a claim to the United Nations to a vast area of the Arctic Ocean — 463,000 square miles, about the size of South Africa — based on the geological extension of its continental shelf.

The commission that reviews claims under the Convention on the Law of the Sea rejected a similar one filed in 2001, citing insufficient scientific evidence.
But Russia, along with Canada and Denmark (through its administration of Greenland), have pressed ahead with competing stakes.
Russia signaled its ambitions — symbolically at least — as early as 2007 when it sent two submersibles 14,000 feet down to seabed beneath the North Pole and planted a titanium Russian flag.

Although the commission might not rule for years, Russia’s move underscored the priority the Kremlin has given to expanding its sovereignty.
The United States, by contrast, has not even ratified the law of the sea treaty, leaving it on the sidelines of territorial jockeying.

Icebreakers / countries

“Nobody cared too much about these sectors,” said Andrei A. Smirnov, deputy director for operations at Atomflot, which operates Russia’s fleet of six nuclear-powered icebreakers, “but when it turned out that 40 percent of confirmed oil and gas deposits were there, everybody became interested in who owns what.”

Some have questioned whether Russia, whose economy is sinking under the weight of sanctions and the falling price of oil, can sustain its efforts in the Arctic.

“It is rather difficult to find rationale for this very pronounced priority in the allocation of increasingly scarce resources,” said Pavel K. Baev of the Peace Research Institute Oslo.
He added that Russian claims that it was protecting its economic interests from NATO were “entirely fictitious.”
“The only challenge to Russian exploitation of the Arctic came from Greenpeace,” he said.

American commanders are watching warily.
The United States and its NATO allies still have significant military forces — including missile defenses and plenty of air power — in the Arctic, but the Army is considering reducing its two brigades in Alaska.
The Navy, which has no ice-capable warships, acknowledged in a report last year that it had little experience operating in the Arctic Ocean, notwithstanding decades of submarine operations during the Cold War.
While it saw little need for new assets immediately, it predicted that could change.

Adm. William E. Gortney, head of the Pentagon’s Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command, said that Russia was increasing its capabilities after years of neglect but did not represent a meaningful threat, yet.
“We’re seeing activity in the Arctic, but it hasn’t manifested in significant change at this point,” he said in a recent interview.

Despite concerns over the military buildup, others said that some of Russia’s moves were benign efforts to ensure the safety of ships on its Northern Sea Route, which could slash the time it takes to ship goods from Asia to Europe.
Russia had pledged to take those steps as an Arctic Council member.

“Some of the things I see them doing — in terms of building up bases, telecommunications, search and rescue capabilities — are things I wish the United States was doing as well,” said Robert J. Papp Jr., a retired admiral and former commandant of the Coast Guard.
He is now the State Department’s senior envoy on Arctic issues.

National Geographic redraws Atlas to reflect shrinking Sea Ice

Less Ice, More Traffic

Aboard the Alex Haley, the crew made contact with each of the ships it encountered plowing the waters, recording details of the owners, courses and the number of crew members who might need to be plucked from the sea in case of disaster.

The cutter’s captain, Cmdr. Seth J. Denning, was a young ensign when he first crossed the Arctic Circle just north of the Bering Strait 19 years ago.
“I never really realized that the Arctic was going to open up as much as it has — enough to allow this much activity,” he said. “I think it surprised many people.”

What had been a brief excursion for Ensign Denning when the Arctic was choked with ice has now become routine.

The Alex Haley — named after the author of “Roots,” who was a 20-year Coast Guard veteran — is one of five ships that the Coast Guard is deploying to the Arctic from June to October.
It will be replaced by an advanced cutter, the Waesche, based in Alameda, Calif.
The Coast Guard has also stationed two rescue helicopters at the airport at Deadhorse, the town where the Trans-Alaska Pipeline begins.

The deployments are part of an annual summer surge that was started in 2012 when Shell first explored the oil fields off Alaska’s North Slope.
The challenges of the new mission have been exacting, given the vast distances and limited support infrastructure on land.
For several days this month the Alex Haley’s only helicopter, which operates from a retractable hangar on the ship’s aft was out of service, awaiting a spare part that had to be flown in on several hops from North Carolina.

This year’s deployments are intended to assess the requirements for operating in the Arctic, but the expected increase in human activity there will put new demands on the service.

“As a maritime nation, we have responsibility for the safety and security of the people who are going to be using that ocean,” said Mr. Papp.
“And we have a responsibility to protect the ocean from the people who will be using it.”

Links :
  • Newsweek : An International Race for the Arctic? Try a Slow, Science-Driven Crawl 
  • Scientific American : Russia Raises an "Ice Curtain" in the Arctic, Thanks to Climate Change
  • USC : The New Ice Curtain: Russia's Strategic Reach to the Arctic
  • BBC : Frosty relations over future of the Arctic
  • Quartz : How Norway lost control of its own secret $500 million Arctic naval base